用于检测抗风疹病毒免疫球蛋白M抗体的三种免疫分析法的评价。

Wayne Dimech, Lena Panagiotopoulos, Joan Marler, Nicolas Laven, Susan Leeson, Elizabeth M Dax
{"title":"用于检测抗风疹病毒免疫球蛋白M抗体的三种免疫分析法的评价。","authors":"Wayne Dimech,&nbsp;Lena Panagiotopoulos,&nbsp;Joan Marler,&nbsp;Nicolas Laven,&nbsp;Susan Leeson,&nbsp;Elizabeth M Dax","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1104-1108.2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three automated assays (Abbott AxSYM, Bayer ADVIA Centaur, and bioMerieux VIDAS) used for the detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M were evaluated. A total of 57 samples from individuals with evidence of infection with rubella virus were used to estimate sensitivity, and 220 samples from blood donors and individuals attending an antenatal clinic who had no evidence of recent infection were used to estimate specificity. Seroconversion panels comprising an additional 31 samples from four individuals were used to determine clinical sensitivity. Samples containing potentially cross-reacting substances were also tested. The sensitivities of the three assays ranged from 84.2 to 96.5%, and the specificities ranged from 96.8 to 99.9%. The Abbott AxSYM assay detected more reactive samples than the other two assays when a panel of 57 positive samples was tested. Bayer ADVIA Centaur detected more reactive samples in the seroconversion panels than the other two assays. All three assays evaluated reported a reactive result in 1 or more of the 48 samples containing potentially cross-reacting analytes. The assays demonstrated comparable performance in testing of a well-characterized panel of samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":72602,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","volume":"12 9","pages":"1104-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1104-1108.2005","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three immunoassays used for detection of anti-rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies.\",\"authors\":\"Wayne Dimech,&nbsp;Lena Panagiotopoulos,&nbsp;Joan Marler,&nbsp;Nicolas Laven,&nbsp;Susan Leeson,&nbsp;Elizabeth M Dax\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1104-1108.2005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three automated assays (Abbott AxSYM, Bayer ADVIA Centaur, and bioMerieux VIDAS) used for the detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M were evaluated. A total of 57 samples from individuals with evidence of infection with rubella virus were used to estimate sensitivity, and 220 samples from blood donors and individuals attending an antenatal clinic who had no evidence of recent infection were used to estimate specificity. Seroconversion panels comprising an additional 31 samples from four individuals were used to determine clinical sensitivity. Samples containing potentially cross-reacting substances were also tested. The sensitivities of the three assays ranged from 84.2 to 96.5%, and the specificities ranged from 96.8 to 99.9%. The Abbott AxSYM assay detected more reactive samples than the other two assays when a panel of 57 positive samples was tested. Bayer ADVIA Centaur detected more reactive samples in the seroconversion panels than the other two assays. All three assays evaluated reported a reactive result in 1 or more of the 48 samples containing potentially cross-reacting analytes. The assays demonstrated comparable performance in testing of a well-characterized panel of samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"1104-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1104-1108.2005\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1104-1108.2005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1104-1108.2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

对用于风疹病毒特异性免疫球蛋白M检测的三种自动检测方法(雅培AxSYM、拜耳ADVIA Centaur和bioMerieux VIDAS)进行了评估。总共有57个样本来自有风疹病毒感染证据的个体,用于估计敏感性,220个样本来自献血者和最近没有感染证据的产前诊所的个体,用于估计特异性。血清转换组包括来自4个个体的另外31个样本,用于确定临床敏感性。含有潜在交叉反应物质的样品也进行了测试。3种检测方法的灵敏度为84.2 ~ 96.5%,特异性为96.8 ~ 99.9%。当检测一组57个阳性样品时,雅培AxSYM检测比其他两种检测检测到更多的反应性样品。拜耳ADVIA Centaur在血清转化面板中检测到的反应性样品比其他两种检测方法更多。在48个含有潜在交叉反应分析物的样品中,所有三种分析方法均报告了一个或多个反应性结果。该分析在测试具有良好特征的样品面板中表现出可比的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of three immunoassays used for detection of anti-rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies.

Three automated assays (Abbott AxSYM, Bayer ADVIA Centaur, and bioMerieux VIDAS) used for the detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M were evaluated. A total of 57 samples from individuals with evidence of infection with rubella virus were used to estimate sensitivity, and 220 samples from blood donors and individuals attending an antenatal clinic who had no evidence of recent infection were used to estimate specificity. Seroconversion panels comprising an additional 31 samples from four individuals were used to determine clinical sensitivity. Samples containing potentially cross-reacting substances were also tested. The sensitivities of the three assays ranged from 84.2 to 96.5%, and the specificities ranged from 96.8 to 99.9%. The Abbott AxSYM assay detected more reactive samples than the other two assays when a panel of 57 positive samples was tested. Bayer ADVIA Centaur detected more reactive samples in the seroconversion panels than the other two assays. All three assays evaluated reported a reactive result in 1 or more of the 48 samples containing potentially cross-reacting analytes. The assays demonstrated comparable performance in testing of a well-characterized panel of samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信