足月期早产儿神经行为评估(NAPI)的并发效度。

Chaya Hyman, Laurie M Snider, Annette Majnemer, Barbara Mazer
{"title":"足月期早产儿神经行为评估(NAPI)的并发效度。","authors":"Chaya Hyman,&nbsp;Laurie M Snider,&nbsp;Annette Majnemer,&nbsp;Barbara Mazer","doi":"10.1080/13638490400022220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate measurement of neonatal neurological integrity is critical for early identification of pre-term and full-term infants at-risk for developmental disability. The Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) was developed to measure the progression of neurobehavioural development in pre-term infants born between 32 weeks post-conceptional age (PCA) and term. This instrument has many unique advantages; however, criterion validity is unknown and results are subsequently difficult to interpret.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the concurrent validity of the NAPI against a criterion instrument, the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioural Assessment Scale (ENNAS), which measures similar constructs and has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 41 pre-term and full-term infants (40 +/- 2 weeks) was assessed with the NAPI and ENNAS on the same day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated that correlations between similar NAPI clusters and ENNAS clusters ranged from 0.35-0.65 and correlations between many similar individual NAPI and ENNAS items ranged from 0.40-0.60. Two NAPI clusters also discriminated between normal, abnormal and suspect performance on the ENNAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NAPI has many unique advantages as a tool. It examines neonates serially, has established weekly normative data and requires minimal infant handling. This study provides new validation of the NAPI instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":79705,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric rehabilitation","volume":"8 3","pages":"225-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13638490400022220","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent validity of the Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) at term age.\",\"authors\":\"Chaya Hyman,&nbsp;Laurie M Snider,&nbsp;Annette Majnemer,&nbsp;Barbara Mazer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13638490400022220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate measurement of neonatal neurological integrity is critical for early identification of pre-term and full-term infants at-risk for developmental disability. The Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) was developed to measure the progression of neurobehavioural development in pre-term infants born between 32 weeks post-conceptional age (PCA) and term. This instrument has many unique advantages; however, criterion validity is unknown and results are subsequently difficult to interpret.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the concurrent validity of the NAPI against a criterion instrument, the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioural Assessment Scale (ENNAS), which measures similar constructs and has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 41 pre-term and full-term infants (40 +/- 2 weeks) was assessed with the NAPI and ENNAS on the same day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated that correlations between similar NAPI clusters and ENNAS clusters ranged from 0.35-0.65 and correlations between many similar individual NAPI and ENNAS items ranged from 0.40-0.60. Two NAPI clusters also discriminated between normal, abnormal and suspect performance on the ENNAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NAPI has many unique advantages as a tool. It examines neonates serially, has established weekly normative data and requires minimal infant handling. This study provides new validation of the NAPI instrument.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"225-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13638490400022220\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490400022220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490400022220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:准确测量新生儿神经完整性对于早期识别有发育障碍风险的早产儿和足月婴儿至关重要。开发了早产儿神经行为评估(NAPI),以测量在受孕后32周(PCA)和足月之间出生的早产儿神经行为发育的进展。这种仪器有许多独特的优点;然而,标准效度是未知的,结果随后难以解释。目的:本研究考察了NAPI与爱因斯坦新生儿神经行为评估量表(ENNAS)的并发效度,后者测量了相似的结构,并证明了出色的信度和效度。方法:选取41例早产儿和足月儿(40±2周),在同一天采用NAPI和ENNAS进行评估。结果:相似的NAPI集群与ENNAS集群之间的相关性在0.35-0.65之间,许多相似的单个NAPI与ENNAS项目之间的相关性在0.40-0.60之间。两个NAPI集群还区分了ENNAS上的正常、异常和可疑性能。结论:NAPI作为一种工具具有许多独特的优点。它对新生儿进行了连续检查,建立了每周的规范数据,并要求最低限度地处理婴儿。本研究为NAPI仪器提供了新的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concurrent validity of the Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) at term age.

Background: Accurate measurement of neonatal neurological integrity is critical for early identification of pre-term and full-term infants at-risk for developmental disability. The Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) was developed to measure the progression of neurobehavioural development in pre-term infants born between 32 weeks post-conceptional age (PCA) and term. This instrument has many unique advantages; however, criterion validity is unknown and results are subsequently difficult to interpret.

Objectives: This study examined the concurrent validity of the NAPI against a criterion instrument, the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioural Assessment Scale (ENNAS), which measures similar constructs and has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity.

Methods: A sample of 41 pre-term and full-term infants (40 +/- 2 weeks) was assessed with the NAPI and ENNAS on the same day.

Results: The findings demonstrated that correlations between similar NAPI clusters and ENNAS clusters ranged from 0.35-0.65 and correlations between many similar individual NAPI and ENNAS items ranged from 0.40-0.60. Two NAPI clusters also discriminated between normal, abnormal and suspect performance on the ENNAS.

Conclusion: The NAPI has many unique advantages as a tool. It examines neonates serially, has established weekly normative data and requires minimal infant handling. This study provides new validation of the NAPI instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信