Chaya Hyman, Laurie M Snider, Annette Majnemer, Barbara Mazer
{"title":"足月期早产儿神经行为评估(NAPI)的并发效度。","authors":"Chaya Hyman, Laurie M Snider, Annette Majnemer, Barbara Mazer","doi":"10.1080/13638490400022220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate measurement of neonatal neurological integrity is critical for early identification of pre-term and full-term infants at-risk for developmental disability. The Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) was developed to measure the progression of neurobehavioural development in pre-term infants born between 32 weeks post-conceptional age (PCA) and term. This instrument has many unique advantages; however, criterion validity is unknown and results are subsequently difficult to interpret.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the concurrent validity of the NAPI against a criterion instrument, the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioural Assessment Scale (ENNAS), which measures similar constructs and has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 41 pre-term and full-term infants (40 +/- 2 weeks) was assessed with the NAPI and ENNAS on the same day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated that correlations between similar NAPI clusters and ENNAS clusters ranged from 0.35-0.65 and correlations between many similar individual NAPI and ENNAS items ranged from 0.40-0.60. Two NAPI clusters also discriminated between normal, abnormal and suspect performance on the ENNAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NAPI has many unique advantages as a tool. It examines neonates serially, has established weekly normative data and requires minimal infant handling. This study provides new validation of the NAPI instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":79705,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric rehabilitation","volume":"8 3","pages":"225-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13638490400022220","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent validity of the Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) at term age.\",\"authors\":\"Chaya Hyman, Laurie M Snider, Annette Majnemer, Barbara Mazer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13638490400022220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate measurement of neonatal neurological integrity is critical for early identification of pre-term and full-term infants at-risk for developmental disability. The Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) was developed to measure the progression of neurobehavioural development in pre-term infants born between 32 weeks post-conceptional age (PCA) and term. This instrument has many unique advantages; however, criterion validity is unknown and results are subsequently difficult to interpret.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the concurrent validity of the NAPI against a criterion instrument, the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioural Assessment Scale (ENNAS), which measures similar constructs and has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 41 pre-term and full-term infants (40 +/- 2 weeks) was assessed with the NAPI and ENNAS on the same day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated that correlations between similar NAPI clusters and ENNAS clusters ranged from 0.35-0.65 and correlations between many similar individual NAPI and ENNAS items ranged from 0.40-0.60. Two NAPI clusters also discriminated between normal, abnormal and suspect performance on the ENNAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NAPI has many unique advantages as a tool. It examines neonates serially, has established weekly normative data and requires minimal infant handling. This study provides new validation of the NAPI instrument.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"225-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13638490400022220\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490400022220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490400022220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Concurrent validity of the Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) at term age.
Background: Accurate measurement of neonatal neurological integrity is critical for early identification of pre-term and full-term infants at-risk for developmental disability. The Neurobehavioural Assessment for Pre-term Infants (NAPI) was developed to measure the progression of neurobehavioural development in pre-term infants born between 32 weeks post-conceptional age (PCA) and term. This instrument has many unique advantages; however, criterion validity is unknown and results are subsequently difficult to interpret.
Objectives: This study examined the concurrent validity of the NAPI against a criterion instrument, the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioural Assessment Scale (ENNAS), which measures similar constructs and has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity.
Methods: A sample of 41 pre-term and full-term infants (40 +/- 2 weeks) was assessed with the NAPI and ENNAS on the same day.
Results: The findings demonstrated that correlations between similar NAPI clusters and ENNAS clusters ranged from 0.35-0.65 and correlations between many similar individual NAPI and ENNAS items ranged from 0.40-0.60. Two NAPI clusters also discriminated between normal, abnormal and suspect performance on the ENNAS.
Conclusion: The NAPI has many unique advantages as a tool. It examines neonates serially, has established weekly normative data and requires minimal infant handling. This study provides new validation of the NAPI instrument.