Carolin Rauter, Markus Mueller, Isabel Diterich, Sabine Zeller, Dieter Hassler, Thomas Meergans, Thomas Hartung
{"title":"基于尿的PCR诊断莱姆病的关键评价。","authors":"Carolin Rauter, Markus Mueller, Isabel Diterich, Sabine Zeller, Dieter Hassler, Thomas Meergans, Thomas Hartung","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.12.8.910-917.2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many approaches were made in recent years to establish urine PCR as a diagnostic tool for Lyme borreliosis, but results are contradictory. In the present study, a standardized protocol spiking urine from healthy donors with a defined amount of whole Borrelia or Borrelia DNA was established. The development of a nested real-time PCR targeting ospA enabled a highly sensitive and quantitative analysis of these samples. We show the following. (i) Storage of spiked urine samples for up to 6 months at--20 degrees C had no negative effect on spike recovery. (ii) Centrifugation of 10 ml of urine at 40,000 x g for 30 min resulted in a concentration of both spikes, i.e., whole Borrelia and DNA. (iii) The inhibition of DNA spike recovery in 48% (11 of 23 samples) of urine samples tested could be attributed to nuclease activity. This was abrogated by alkalizing the urine or by working with the samples on ice. Despite optimized conditions, analysis of urine samples of 12 patients with erythema migrans, the clinical stage considered to be associated with the highest bacterial load, revealed a positive result in only one sample. All 12 samples were negative by an alternative PCR targeting flagellin. The results of our study support doubts that urine is a suitable material for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72602,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","volume":"12 8","pages":"910-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.910-917.2005","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical evaluation of urine-based PCR assay for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Carolin Rauter, Markus Mueller, Isabel Diterich, Sabine Zeller, Dieter Hassler, Thomas Meergans, Thomas Hartung\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/CDLI.12.8.910-917.2005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many approaches were made in recent years to establish urine PCR as a diagnostic tool for Lyme borreliosis, but results are contradictory. In the present study, a standardized protocol spiking urine from healthy donors with a defined amount of whole Borrelia or Borrelia DNA was established. The development of a nested real-time PCR targeting ospA enabled a highly sensitive and quantitative analysis of these samples. We show the following. (i) Storage of spiked urine samples for up to 6 months at--20 degrees C had no negative effect on spike recovery. (ii) Centrifugation of 10 ml of urine at 40,000 x g for 30 min resulted in a concentration of both spikes, i.e., whole Borrelia and DNA. (iii) The inhibition of DNA spike recovery in 48% (11 of 23 samples) of urine samples tested could be attributed to nuclease activity. This was abrogated by alkalizing the urine or by working with the samples on ice. Despite optimized conditions, analysis of urine samples of 12 patients with erythema migrans, the clinical stage considered to be associated with the highest bacterial load, revealed a positive result in only one sample. All 12 samples were negative by an alternative PCR targeting flagellin. The results of our study support doubts that urine is a suitable material for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology\",\"volume\":\"12 8\",\"pages\":\"910-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.910-917.2005\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.910-917.2005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.8.910-917.2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52
摘要
近年来,人们提出了许多方法来建立尿PCR作为莱姆病的诊断工具,但结果相互矛盾。在目前的研究中,建立了一个标准化的方案,从健康捐赠者的尿液中提取一定量的整个伯氏疏螺旋体或伯氏疏螺旋体DNA。针对ospA的巢式实时PCR的开发使这些样品的高度敏感和定量分析成为可能。我们展示了以下内容。(i)在-20℃下储存加尖刺的尿液样本长达6个月,对加尖刺的恢复没有负面影响。(ii)将10毫升尿液在40,000 x g下离心30分钟,产生两种尖峰的浓度,即整个伯氏疏螺旋体和DNA。(iii)在所检测的尿样中,有48%(23个样本中的11个)的DNA尖峰恢复被抑制可归因于核酸酶活性。通过将尿液碱化或将样本放在冰上处理,可以消除这种情况。尽管优化了条件,但对12例迁移性红斑患者的尿液样本进行分析,发现只有一个样本呈阳性,而迁移性红斑的临床阶段被认为与细菌负荷最高有关。所有12份样品均通过针对鞭毛蛋白的PCR检测为阴性。我们的研究结果支持了尿液是莱姆病诊断的合适材料的怀疑。
Critical evaluation of urine-based PCR assay for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.
Many approaches were made in recent years to establish urine PCR as a diagnostic tool for Lyme borreliosis, but results are contradictory. In the present study, a standardized protocol spiking urine from healthy donors with a defined amount of whole Borrelia or Borrelia DNA was established. The development of a nested real-time PCR targeting ospA enabled a highly sensitive and quantitative analysis of these samples. We show the following. (i) Storage of spiked urine samples for up to 6 months at--20 degrees C had no negative effect on spike recovery. (ii) Centrifugation of 10 ml of urine at 40,000 x g for 30 min resulted in a concentration of both spikes, i.e., whole Borrelia and DNA. (iii) The inhibition of DNA spike recovery in 48% (11 of 23 samples) of urine samples tested could be attributed to nuclease activity. This was abrogated by alkalizing the urine or by working with the samples on ice. Despite optimized conditions, analysis of urine samples of 12 patients with erythema migrans, the clinical stage considered to be associated with the highest bacterial load, revealed a positive result in only one sample. All 12 samples were negative by an alternative PCR targeting flagellin. The results of our study support doubts that urine is a suitable material for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.