吸入联合治疗对哮喘治疗的影响。

P Santus, F Di Marco, R Carlucci, E Belloli, F Casanova, F Giovannelli, M Verga, S Centanni
{"title":"吸入联合治疗对哮喘治疗的影响。","authors":"P Santus,&nbsp;F Di Marco,&nbsp;R Carlucci,&nbsp;E Belloli,&nbsp;F Casanova,&nbsp;F Giovannelli,&nbsp;M Verga,&nbsp;S Centanni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The growing use of guidelines to manage asthmatic patients prompted us to evaluate their impact on clinical practice. This study was performed in two similar groups of asthmatic patients. A retrospective and prospective review of medical records in an asthmatic population was performed. The patients were followed up for a mean period of 2 years before (group 1 [G1]) and after the publication of the Guideline for Asthma Treatment (group 2 [G2]). After evaluation of objective/clinical measurements we noticed a significant difference between both groups. There were 23 and 40 patients who did not complain of any respiratory symptoms in G1 and G2, respectively. The total number of visits to the emergency department decreased by more than 75%, from 26 (G1) to six (G2). The forced expiratory volume in 1 sec improved by a mean of 4% in G1 and 9% in G2. After application of the guidelines there was a redistribution of the degree of disease severity. In G2, there was a 12% increase in the use of long-acting beta2-stimulating sprays; 40% of the patients were using a combination of a long-acting beta2-stimulating drug and an inhaled steroid. In our experience, the use of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines leads to better management of asthma patients with different degrees of severity. These findings suggest the need to perform a similar analysis in a broader setting such as a national multicenter survey in order to collect information on the challenges of putting these theoretical difficulties into practice and to compare their implementation in distinct centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13940,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","volume":"25 2","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of inhaled combination therapy on asthma management.\",\"authors\":\"P Santus,&nbsp;F Di Marco,&nbsp;R Carlucci,&nbsp;E Belloli,&nbsp;F Casanova,&nbsp;F Giovannelli,&nbsp;M Verga,&nbsp;S Centanni\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The growing use of guidelines to manage asthmatic patients prompted us to evaluate their impact on clinical practice. This study was performed in two similar groups of asthmatic patients. A retrospective and prospective review of medical records in an asthmatic population was performed. The patients were followed up for a mean period of 2 years before (group 1 [G1]) and after the publication of the Guideline for Asthma Treatment (group 2 [G2]). After evaluation of objective/clinical measurements we noticed a significant difference between both groups. There were 23 and 40 patients who did not complain of any respiratory symptoms in G1 and G2, respectively. The total number of visits to the emergency department decreased by more than 75%, from 26 (G1) to six (G2). The forced expiratory volume in 1 sec improved by a mean of 4% in G1 and 9% in G2. After application of the guidelines there was a redistribution of the degree of disease severity. In G2, there was a 12% increase in the use of long-acting beta2-stimulating sprays; 40% of the patients were using a combination of a long-acting beta2-stimulating drug and an inhaled steroid. In our experience, the use of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines leads to better management of asthma patients with different degrees of severity. These findings suggest the need to perform a similar analysis in a broader setting such as a national multicenter survey in order to collect information on the challenges of putting these theoretical difficulties into practice and to compare their implementation in distinct centers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology research\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"57-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的使用指南来管理哮喘患者促使我们评估其对临床实践的影响。这项研究在两组相似的哮喘患者中进行。对哮喘人群的医疗记录进行回顾性和前瞻性回顾。在《哮喘治疗指南》发布前(1组[G1])和发布后(2组[G2])对患者进行平均2年的随访。在客观/临床测量评估后,我们注意到两组之间存在显著差异。G1期和G2期分别有23例和40例患者无呼吸道症状。到急诊科就诊的总次数减少了75%以上,从26次(G1)减少到6次(G2)。G1组1秒用力呼气量平均提高4%,G2组平均提高9%。应用指南后,对疾病严重程度进行了重新分配。在G2组,长效β -刺激喷雾剂的使用增加了12%;40%的患者同时使用长效β -刺激药物和吸入类固醇。根据我们的经验,使用全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南可以更好地管理不同严重程度的哮喘患者。这些发现表明,有必要在更广泛的背景下进行类似的分析,如全国多中心调查,以收集有关将这些理论困难付诸实践的挑战的信息,并比较它们在不同中心的实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of inhaled combination therapy on asthma management.

The growing use of guidelines to manage asthmatic patients prompted us to evaluate their impact on clinical practice. This study was performed in two similar groups of asthmatic patients. A retrospective and prospective review of medical records in an asthmatic population was performed. The patients were followed up for a mean period of 2 years before (group 1 [G1]) and after the publication of the Guideline for Asthma Treatment (group 2 [G2]). After evaluation of objective/clinical measurements we noticed a significant difference between both groups. There were 23 and 40 patients who did not complain of any respiratory symptoms in G1 and G2, respectively. The total number of visits to the emergency department decreased by more than 75%, from 26 (G1) to six (G2). The forced expiratory volume in 1 sec improved by a mean of 4% in G1 and 9% in G2. After application of the guidelines there was a redistribution of the degree of disease severity. In G2, there was a 12% increase in the use of long-acting beta2-stimulating sprays; 40% of the patients were using a combination of a long-acting beta2-stimulating drug and an inhaled steroid. In our experience, the use of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines leads to better management of asthma patients with different degrees of severity. These findings suggest the need to perform a similar analysis in a broader setting such as a national multicenter survey in order to collect information on the challenges of putting these theoretical difficulties into practice and to compare their implementation in distinct centers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信