新的和已建立的钴胺素缺乏症标志物:补充或独家诊断策略。

Jörn Schneede, Per Magne Ueland
{"title":"新的和已建立的钴胺素缺乏症标志物:补充或独家诊断策略。","authors":"Jörn Schneede,&nbsp;Per Magne Ueland","doi":"10.1055/s-2005-872399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New developments in diagnostic markers and a better understanding of the limitations of traditional diagnostic strategies have allowed diagnosis of earlier stages and atypical forms of cobalamin deficiency. Still, there are no generally accepted guidelines for the definition, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cobalamin deficiency. The new trend toward defining cobalamin deficiency purely on the basis of biochemical test outcomes in the absence of overt clinical signs and symptoms could, however, be problematic and may result in overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Use of metabolic markers for the assessment of cobalamin deficiency allows the demonstration of tissue deficiency, but the establishment of the cause of deficiency should also be part of the diagnostic approach. Four groups of diagnostic tests are currently available and these include total cobalamin and cobalamin fractions (such as holo-transcobalamin), tests of gastrointestinal dysfunction, tests of metabolic function, and different gene tests. Among the available tests, only homocysteine, methylmalonic acid, holo-transcobalamin, and possibly methylcitric acid are considered to be useful in clinical practice to add to cobalamin. Gastrointestinal function tests may identify the cause of cobalamin deficiency, whereas the diagnostic usefulness of genetic testing needs to be evaluated. This article provides an overview of recent developments and a reappraisal of novel and established diagnostic markers for cobalamin deficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":87139,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in vascular medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":"140-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2005-872399","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel and established markers of cobalamin deficiency: complementary or exclusive diagnostic strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Jörn Schneede,&nbsp;Per Magne Ueland\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2005-872399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>New developments in diagnostic markers and a better understanding of the limitations of traditional diagnostic strategies have allowed diagnosis of earlier stages and atypical forms of cobalamin deficiency. Still, there are no generally accepted guidelines for the definition, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cobalamin deficiency. The new trend toward defining cobalamin deficiency purely on the basis of biochemical test outcomes in the absence of overt clinical signs and symptoms could, however, be problematic and may result in overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Use of metabolic markers for the assessment of cobalamin deficiency allows the demonstration of tissue deficiency, but the establishment of the cause of deficiency should also be part of the diagnostic approach. Four groups of diagnostic tests are currently available and these include total cobalamin and cobalamin fractions (such as holo-transcobalamin), tests of gastrointestinal dysfunction, tests of metabolic function, and different gene tests. Among the available tests, only homocysteine, methylmalonic acid, holo-transcobalamin, and possibly methylcitric acid are considered to be useful in clinical practice to add to cobalamin. Gastrointestinal function tests may identify the cause of cobalamin deficiency, whereas the diagnostic usefulness of genetic testing needs to be evaluated. This article provides an overview of recent developments and a reappraisal of novel and established diagnostic markers for cobalamin deficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in vascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"140-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2005-872399\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in vascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in vascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

诊断标志物的新发展和对传统诊断策略局限性的更好理解,使诊断早期阶段和非典型形式的钴胺素缺乏症成为可能。然而,对于钴胺素缺乏症的定义、诊断、治疗和随访尚无公认的指导方针。然而,在没有明显临床体征和症状的情况下,纯粹根据生化测试结果来定义钴胺素缺乏症的新趋势可能存在问题,并可能导致过度诊断和过度治疗。使用代谢标志物评估钴胺素缺乏症可以证明组织缺乏症,但确定缺乏症的原因也应该是诊断方法的一部分。目前有四组诊断测试,包括总钴胺素和钴胺素部分(如全钴胺素-转钴胺素)、胃肠道功能障碍测试、代谢功能测试和不同的基因测试。在现有的测试中,只有同型半胱氨酸、甲基丙二酸、全反钴胺素和可能的甲基柠檬酸被认为在临床实践中可添加到钴胺素中。胃肠功能测试可以确定钴胺素缺乏症的原因,而基因测试的诊断有用性需要评估。本文提供了最近的发展概况,并重新评价新的和已建立的诊断标记钴胺素缺乏症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel and established markers of cobalamin deficiency: complementary or exclusive diagnostic strategies.

New developments in diagnostic markers and a better understanding of the limitations of traditional diagnostic strategies have allowed diagnosis of earlier stages and atypical forms of cobalamin deficiency. Still, there are no generally accepted guidelines for the definition, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cobalamin deficiency. The new trend toward defining cobalamin deficiency purely on the basis of biochemical test outcomes in the absence of overt clinical signs and symptoms could, however, be problematic and may result in overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Use of metabolic markers for the assessment of cobalamin deficiency allows the demonstration of tissue deficiency, but the establishment of the cause of deficiency should also be part of the diagnostic approach. Four groups of diagnostic tests are currently available and these include total cobalamin and cobalamin fractions (such as holo-transcobalamin), tests of gastrointestinal dysfunction, tests of metabolic function, and different gene tests. Among the available tests, only homocysteine, methylmalonic acid, holo-transcobalamin, and possibly methylcitric acid are considered to be useful in clinical practice to add to cobalamin. Gastrointestinal function tests may identify the cause of cobalamin deficiency, whereas the diagnostic usefulness of genetic testing needs to be evaluated. This article provides an overview of recent developments and a reappraisal of novel and established diagnostic markers for cobalamin deficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信