智力和神经效率:任务内容和性别对大脑-智商关系影响的进一步证据

Aljoscha C. Neubauer, Roland H. Grabner, Andreas Fink, Christa Neuper
{"title":"智力和神经效率:任务内容和性别对大脑-智商关系影响的进一步证据","authors":"Aljoscha C. Neubauer,&nbsp;Roland H. Grabner,&nbsp;Andreas Fink,&nbsp;Christa Neuper","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the field of physiological study of human intelligence, strong evidence of a more efficient operation (i.e., less activation) of the brain in brighter individuals (the <em>neural efficiency</em> hypothesis) can be found. Most studies in this field have used single, homogeneous tasks and have not examined sex differences. In analyzing the extent of Event-related Desynchronization (ERD) in the EEG during the performance of a verbal and a visuo-spatial task, we recently found that males and females display <em>neural efficiency</em> primarily in the domain where they usually perform better (i.e., verbal in females and spatial in males; cf. A.C. Neubauer, A. Fink, D.G. Schrausser, Intelligence and neural efficiency: the influence of task content and sex on brain–IQ relationship. Intelligence, 30 (2002) 515–536). However, this interpretation was complicated by differences in the complexity of the two tasks. By using a verbal (semantic) and a spatial (rotation) task of comparable complexity in this research, we sought to replicate and extend our earlier findings by additionally considering the individual differences in intelligence structure and the topographical distribution over the cortex. Findings were similar to the previous study: Females (<em>n</em> = 35) display <em>neural efficiency</em> (i.e., less brain activation in brighter individuals) primarily during the verbal task, males (<em>n</em> = 31) in the spatial task. However, the strength of this brain activation–IQ relationship varies with the intelligence factor: In males, the highest correlations were observed for spatial IQ, in females for verbal IQ. Furthermore, the sexes displayed topographical differences of <em>neural efficiency</em> patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 217-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.011","citationCount":"160","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligence and neural efficiency: Further evidence of the influence of task content and sex on the brain–IQ relationship\",\"authors\":\"Aljoscha C. Neubauer,&nbsp;Roland H. Grabner,&nbsp;Andreas Fink,&nbsp;Christa Neuper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the field of physiological study of human intelligence, strong evidence of a more efficient operation (i.e., less activation) of the brain in brighter individuals (the <em>neural efficiency</em> hypothesis) can be found. Most studies in this field have used single, homogeneous tasks and have not examined sex differences. In analyzing the extent of Event-related Desynchronization (ERD) in the EEG during the performance of a verbal and a visuo-spatial task, we recently found that males and females display <em>neural efficiency</em> primarily in the domain where they usually perform better (i.e., verbal in females and spatial in males; cf. A.C. Neubauer, A. Fink, D.G. Schrausser, Intelligence and neural efficiency: the influence of task content and sex on brain–IQ relationship. Intelligence, 30 (2002) 515–536). However, this interpretation was complicated by differences in the complexity of the two tasks. By using a verbal (semantic) and a spatial (rotation) task of comparable complexity in this research, we sought to replicate and extend our earlier findings by additionally considering the individual differences in intelligence structure and the topographical distribution over the cortex. Findings were similar to the previous study: Females (<em>n</em> = 35) display <em>neural efficiency</em> (i.e., less brain activation in brighter individuals) primarily during the verbal task, males (<em>n</em> = 31) in the spatial task. However, the strength of this brain activation–IQ relationship varies with the intelligence factor: In males, the highest correlations were observed for spatial IQ, in females for verbal IQ. Furthermore, the sexes displayed topographical differences of <em>neural efficiency</em> patterns.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 217-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.011\",\"citationCount\":\"160\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092664100500162X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092664100500162X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 160

摘要

在人类智力的生理研究领域,可以找到强有力的证据,证明聪明的人的大脑运作效率更高(即激活程度更低)(神经效率假说)。这一领域的大多数研究都使用了单一的、同质的任务,没有检查性别差异。在分析言语任务和视觉空间任务执行过程中脑电图的事件相关去同步(ERD)程度时,我们最近发现男性和女性主要在他们通常表现较好的领域(即女性在言语和男性在空间;参见A.C. Neubauer, a.a Fink, D.G. Schrausser,智力与神经效率:任务内容和性别对脑-智商关系的影响。情报,30(2002)515-536。然而,由于这两项任务的复杂性不同,这种解释变得复杂起来。在这项研究中,我们使用了相当复杂的语言(语义)和空间(旋转)任务,通过额外考虑智力结构和皮层地形分布的个体差异,我们试图复制和扩展我们早期的发现。研究结果与之前的研究相似:女性(n = 35)主要在语言任务中表现出神经效率(即,更聪明的人大脑活动更少),而男性(n = 31)在空间任务中表现出神经效率。然而,这种大脑激活与智商的关系的强度因智力因素而异:在男性中,空间智商的相关性最高,而在女性中,语言智商的相关性最高。此外,两性在神经效率模式上表现出地形差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intelligence and neural efficiency: Further evidence of the influence of task content and sex on the brain–IQ relationship

In the field of physiological study of human intelligence, strong evidence of a more efficient operation (i.e., less activation) of the brain in brighter individuals (the neural efficiency hypothesis) can be found. Most studies in this field have used single, homogeneous tasks and have not examined sex differences. In analyzing the extent of Event-related Desynchronization (ERD) in the EEG during the performance of a verbal and a visuo-spatial task, we recently found that males and females display neural efficiency primarily in the domain where they usually perform better (i.e., verbal in females and spatial in males; cf. A.C. Neubauer, A. Fink, D.G. Schrausser, Intelligence and neural efficiency: the influence of task content and sex on brain–IQ relationship. Intelligence, 30 (2002) 515–536). However, this interpretation was complicated by differences in the complexity of the two tasks. By using a verbal (semantic) and a spatial (rotation) task of comparable complexity in this research, we sought to replicate and extend our earlier findings by additionally considering the individual differences in intelligence structure and the topographical distribution over the cortex. Findings were similar to the previous study: Females (n = 35) display neural efficiency (i.e., less brain activation in brighter individuals) primarily during the verbal task, males (n = 31) in the spatial task. However, the strength of this brain activation–IQ relationship varies with the intelligence factor: In males, the highest correlations were observed for spatial IQ, in females for verbal IQ. Furthermore, the sexes displayed topographical differences of neural efficiency patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信