F O Richards, A Eigege, D Pam, A Kal, A Lenhart, J O A Oneyka, M Y Jinadu, E S Miri
{"title":"盘尾丝虫病的大规模伊维菌素治疗:缺乏证据表明对共同流行地区的班氏乌切利菌传播有附带影响。","authors":"F O Richards, A Eigege, D Pam, A Kal, A Lenhart, J O A Oneyka, M Y Jinadu, E S Miri","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-4-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has long been interest in determining if mass ivermectin administration for onchocerciasis has 'unknowingly' interrupted lymphatic filariasis (LF) transmission where the endemicity of the two diseases' overlaps. We studied 11 communities in central Nigeria entomologically for LF by performing mosquito dissections on Anopheline LF vectors. Six of the communities studied were located within an onchocerciasis treatment zone, and five were located outside of that zone. Communities inside the treatment zone had been offered ivermectin treatment for two-five years, with a mean coverage of 81% of the eligible population (range 58-95%). We found 4.9% of mosquitoes were infected with any larval stage of W. bancrofti in the head or thorax in 362 dissections in the untreated villages compared to 4.7% infected in 549 dissections in the ivermectin treated villages (Mantel-Haenszel ChiSquare 0.02, P = 0.9). We concluded that ivermectin annual therapy for onchocerciasis has not interrupted transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti (the causative agent of LF in Nigeria).</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":"4 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-4-6","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass ivermectin treatment for onchocerciasis: lack of evidence for collateral impact on transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti in areas of co-endemicity.\",\"authors\":\"F O Richards, A Eigege, D Pam, A Kal, A Lenhart, J O A Oneyka, M Y Jinadu, E S Miri\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1475-2883-4-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There has long been interest in determining if mass ivermectin administration for onchocerciasis has 'unknowingly' interrupted lymphatic filariasis (LF) transmission where the endemicity of the two diseases' overlaps. We studied 11 communities in central Nigeria entomologically for LF by performing mosquito dissections on Anopheline LF vectors. Six of the communities studied were located within an onchocerciasis treatment zone, and five were located outside of that zone. Communities inside the treatment zone had been offered ivermectin treatment for two-five years, with a mean coverage of 81% of the eligible population (range 58-95%). We found 4.9% of mosquitoes were infected with any larval stage of W. bancrofti in the head or thorax in 362 dissections in the untreated villages compared to 4.7% infected in 549 dissections in the ivermectin treated villages (Mantel-Haenszel ChiSquare 0.02, P = 0.9). We concluded that ivermectin annual therapy for onchocerciasis has not interrupted transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti (the causative agent of LF in Nigeria).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filaria journal\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-4-6\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filaria journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-4-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-4-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
摘要
长期以来,人们一直有兴趣确定用于盘尾丝虫病的大规模伊维菌素治疗是否在两种疾病的流行重叠的地方“不知不觉”中断了淋巴丝虫病(LF)的传播。我们对尼日利亚中部11个群落进行了LF昆虫学研究,对按蚊LF媒介进行了蚊虫解剖。所研究的社区中有6个位于盘尾丝虫病治疗区内,5个位于该区域之外。治疗区内的社区接受了为期2 - 5年的伊维菌素治疗,平均覆盖率为符合条件人口的81%(范围为58-95%)。结果显示,未处理村362份切片中,头部或胸部感染班氏布氏蜱幼虫的比例为4.9%,而伊维菌素处理村549份切片中感染班氏布氏蜱幼虫的比例为4.7% (Mantel-Haenszel ChiSquare 0.02, P = 0.9)。我们得出结论,每年对盘尾丝虫病进行伊维菌素治疗并没有阻断班氏乌切里菌(尼日利亚LF的病原体)的传播。
Mass ivermectin treatment for onchocerciasis: lack of evidence for collateral impact on transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti in areas of co-endemicity.
There has long been interest in determining if mass ivermectin administration for onchocerciasis has 'unknowingly' interrupted lymphatic filariasis (LF) transmission where the endemicity of the two diseases' overlaps. We studied 11 communities in central Nigeria entomologically for LF by performing mosquito dissections on Anopheline LF vectors. Six of the communities studied were located within an onchocerciasis treatment zone, and five were located outside of that zone. Communities inside the treatment zone had been offered ivermectin treatment for two-five years, with a mean coverage of 81% of the eligible population (range 58-95%). We found 4.9% of mosquitoes were infected with any larval stage of W. bancrofti in the head or thorax in 362 dissections in the untreated villages compared to 4.7% infected in 549 dissections in the ivermectin treated villages (Mantel-Haenszel ChiSquare 0.02, P = 0.9). We concluded that ivermectin annual therapy for onchocerciasis has not interrupted transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti (the causative agent of LF in Nigeria).