糖尿病患者血运重建:药物洗脱支架是解决方案吗?

Giulio Guagliumi, Giuseppe Musumeci
{"title":"糖尿病患者血运重建:药物洗脱支架是解决方案吗?","authors":"Giulio Guagliumi,&nbsp;Giuseppe Musumeci","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Restenosis and need of repeat revascularization as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are all significantly increased after coronary stenting in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic patients. The potential clinical benefit of drug-eluting stents (DES) in this cohort is currently under definition. Both Cypher and Taxus stents in randomized clinical trials and real world post-approval registries appear to be effective with a substantial reduction in MACE and target lesion revascularization compared to control patients. However, despite stability of target lesion revascularization obtained with DES, diabetes continues to be associated with a significant increase in MACE at mid- and long-term follow-up. These data emphasize the role of a fully integrated medical, glycemic and device treatment for optimal outcome in diabetes. In order to develop new guidelines for diabetic treatment, prospective and randomized studies comparing DES with surgical revascularization in three-vessel and/or left main disease are ongoing. Despite significant amelioration obtained with DES the diabetic population remains an unmet need, requiring further basic and clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":80289,"journal":{"name":"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","volume":"6 6","pages":"507-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revascularization of diabetic patients: are drug-eluting stents the solution?\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Guagliumi,&nbsp;Giuseppe Musumeci\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Restenosis and need of repeat revascularization as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are all significantly increased after coronary stenting in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic patients. The potential clinical benefit of drug-eluting stents (DES) in this cohort is currently under definition. Both Cypher and Taxus stents in randomized clinical trials and real world post-approval registries appear to be effective with a substantial reduction in MACE and target lesion revascularization compared to control patients. However, despite stability of target lesion revascularization obtained with DES, diabetes continues to be associated with a significant increase in MACE at mid- and long-term follow-up. These data emphasize the role of a fully integrated medical, glycemic and device treatment for optimal outcome in diabetes. In order to develop new guidelines for diabetic treatment, prospective and randomized studies comparing DES with surgical revascularization in three-vessel and/or left main disease are ongoing. Despite significant amelioration obtained with DES the diabetic population remains an unmet need, requiring further basic and clinical research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"507-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者冠状动脉支架植入术后再狭窄和需要重复血运重建以及主要不良心脏事件(MACE)均显著增加。药物洗脱支架(DES)在该队列中的潜在临床益处目前尚不明确。与对照患者相比,Cypher和Taxus支架在随机临床试验和现实世界的批准后注册中都表现出显著降低MACE和靶病变血运重建的效果。然而,尽管通过DES获得了目标病变血运重建的稳定性,但在中长期随访中,糖尿病仍然与MACE显著增加相关。这些数据强调了全面整合医疗、血糖和器械治疗对糖尿病最佳预后的作用。为了制定新的糖尿病治疗指南,正在进行前瞻性和随机研究,比较DES与三支血管和/或左主干疾病的外科血运重建术。尽管DES显著改善了糖尿病人群的病情,但仍未得到满足,需要进一步的基础和临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revascularization of diabetic patients: are drug-eluting stents the solution?

Restenosis and need of repeat revascularization as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) are all significantly increased after coronary stenting in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic patients. The potential clinical benefit of drug-eluting stents (DES) in this cohort is currently under definition. Both Cypher and Taxus stents in randomized clinical trials and real world post-approval registries appear to be effective with a substantial reduction in MACE and target lesion revascularization compared to control patients. However, despite stability of target lesion revascularization obtained with DES, diabetes continues to be associated with a significant increase in MACE at mid- and long-term follow-up. These data emphasize the role of a fully integrated medical, glycemic and device treatment for optimal outcome in diabetes. In order to develop new guidelines for diabetic treatment, prospective and randomized studies comparing DES with surgical revascularization in three-vessel and/or left main disease are ongoing. Despite significant amelioration obtained with DES the diabetic population remains an unmet need, requiring further basic and clinical research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信