Alessandro Carunchio, Roberto Ricci, Pietro Mazzarotto, Alessandro Danesi, Giorgia Caferri, Alessandro Ferraironi, Elena Faina, Vincenzo Ceci
{"title":"【冠状动脉、临床特征及冠状动脉血流正常的非st段抬高型心肌梗死】。","authors":"Alessandro Carunchio, Roberto Ricci, Pietro Mazzarotto, Alessandro Danesi, Giorgia Caferri, Alessandro Ferraironi, Elena Faina, Vincenzo Ceci","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No assessment has been made up today concerning clinical features, coronary artery flow and mid-term prognosis between acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients without epicardial coronary disease and those with epicardial coronary artery stenosis > 50% of at least one vessel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated consecutive NSTEMI patients who had undergone coronary angiography within the first 48 hours of infarction. We examined their age, sex, smoking habits, the incidence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The coronary blood flow was assessed according to the conventional TIMI flow grade and with the TIMI frame count (TFC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, 50 patients out of 996 with NSTEMI (20 males, 30 females, mean age 60 +/- 13 years), showed normal coronary arteries (5%). This subset of patients was compared with 50 NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. Patients of the first group were younger and more frequently female with respect to NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. The differences between the two groups with respect to diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia incidence and ejection fraction (52 vs 47%) were not statistically significant. With the corrected TFC (cTFC) method we found a slow flow in at least one coronary vessel in a high percentage of NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries. When we compared normal vessels between the two groups, we found a higher cTFC in NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries than in NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. After a 16 +/- 8 months of follow-up we observed 8 events in the normal vessel group and 10 in the coronary stenosis group (p = NS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The possible hypothesis of microvessel dysfunction as a pathogenesis of a slow flow in NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries is strong. Further studies are warranted to investigate microvessel disease and characteristics and possible causes of abnormalities. A larger perspective study with a longer follow-up is needed as well to evaluate the prognosis in this subset of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":80290,"journal":{"name":"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","volume":"6 4","pages":"205-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries, clinical features and coronary artery flow].\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Carunchio, Roberto Ricci, Pietro Mazzarotto, Alessandro Danesi, Giorgia Caferri, Alessandro Ferraironi, Elena Faina, Vincenzo Ceci\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No assessment has been made up today concerning clinical features, coronary artery flow and mid-term prognosis between acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients without epicardial coronary disease and those with epicardial coronary artery stenosis > 50% of at least one vessel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated consecutive NSTEMI patients who had undergone coronary angiography within the first 48 hours of infarction. We examined their age, sex, smoking habits, the incidence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The coronary blood flow was assessed according to the conventional TIMI flow grade and with the TIMI frame count (TFC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, 50 patients out of 996 with NSTEMI (20 males, 30 females, mean age 60 +/- 13 years), showed normal coronary arteries (5%). This subset of patients was compared with 50 NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. Patients of the first group were younger and more frequently female with respect to NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. The differences between the two groups with respect to diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia incidence and ejection fraction (52 vs 47%) were not statistically significant. With the corrected TFC (cTFC) method we found a slow flow in at least one coronary vessel in a high percentage of NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries. When we compared normal vessels between the two groups, we found a higher cTFC in NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries than in NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. After a 16 +/- 8 months of follow-up we observed 8 events in the normal vessel group and 10 in the coronary stenosis group (p = NS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The possible hypothesis of microvessel dysfunction as a pathogenesis of a slow flow in NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries is strong. Further studies are warranted to investigate microvessel disease and characteristics and possible causes of abnormalities. A larger perspective study with a longer follow-up is needed as well to evaluate the prognosis in this subset of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"205-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前尚未对无心外膜冠状动脉疾病的急性非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者与心外膜冠状动脉狭窄> 50%至少一根血管的患者的临床特征、冠状动脉血流和中期预后进行评估。方法:我们评估了在梗死后48小时内接受冠状动脉造影的连续NSTEMI患者。我们调查了他们的年龄、性别、吸烟习惯、糖尿病发病率、血脂异常、高血压和左心室射血分数。根据常规TIMI血流等级和TIMI框架计数(TFC)评估冠状动脉血流。结果:2001年10月1日至2003年12月31日,996例非stemi患者中,50例冠状动脉正常(5%),其中男性20例,女性30例,平均年龄60±13岁。将这组患者与50例冠状动脉狭窄的NSTEMI患者进行比较。第一组患者相对于NSTEMI合并冠状动脉狭窄的患者更年轻,女性更常见。两组在糖尿病、高血压、血脂异常发生率和射血分数方面的差异(52% vs 47%)无统计学意义。通过校正TFC (cTFC)方法,我们发现在冠状动脉正常的NSTEMI患者中,至少有一条冠状动脉血流缓慢。当我们比较两组的正常血管时,我们发现冠状动脉正常的NSTEMI患者的cTFC高于冠状动脉狭窄的NSTEMI患者。经过16 +/- 8个月的随访,我们观察到正常血管组8例,冠状动脉狭窄组10例(p = NS)。结论:微血管功能障碍可能是冠状动脉正常的非stemi患者血流缓慢的发病机制。需要进一步研究微血管疾病及其特征和可能的异常原因。还需要一个更大的、随访时间更长的研究来评估这部分患者的预后。
[Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries, clinical features and coronary artery flow].
Background: No assessment has been made up today concerning clinical features, coronary artery flow and mid-term prognosis between acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients without epicardial coronary disease and those with epicardial coronary artery stenosis > 50% of at least one vessel.
Methods: We evaluated consecutive NSTEMI patients who had undergone coronary angiography within the first 48 hours of infarction. We examined their age, sex, smoking habits, the incidence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The coronary blood flow was assessed according to the conventional TIMI flow grade and with the TIMI frame count (TFC).
Results: From October 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, 50 patients out of 996 with NSTEMI (20 males, 30 females, mean age 60 +/- 13 years), showed normal coronary arteries (5%). This subset of patients was compared with 50 NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. Patients of the first group were younger and more frequently female with respect to NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. The differences between the two groups with respect to diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia incidence and ejection fraction (52 vs 47%) were not statistically significant. With the corrected TFC (cTFC) method we found a slow flow in at least one coronary vessel in a high percentage of NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries. When we compared normal vessels between the two groups, we found a higher cTFC in NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries than in NSTEMI patients with coronary stenosis. After a 16 +/- 8 months of follow-up we observed 8 events in the normal vessel group and 10 in the coronary stenosis group (p = NS).
Conclusions: The possible hypothesis of microvessel dysfunction as a pathogenesis of a slow flow in NSTEMI patients with normal coronary arteries is strong. Further studies are warranted to investigate microvessel disease and characteristics and possible causes of abnormalities. A larger perspective study with a longer follow-up is needed as well to evaluate the prognosis in this subset of patients.