特殊教育中实验研究与实证定性研究的重要性。

Ellen Brantlinger, Janette Klingner, Virginia Richardson
{"title":"特殊教育中实验研究与实证定性研究的重要性。","authors":"Ellen Brantlinger,&nbsp;Janette Klingner,&nbsp;Virginia Richardson","doi":"10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43<92:IOEAWA>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past few decades qualitative research has increasingly appeared in special education journals. However, much of this work falls within the parameters of producing useful technical information that can be applied to the contexts where children and adults with disabilities learn, work, and live. Experimental qualitative studies that rely on postmodern or poststructural analyses, critical theory, and narrative research with subjective personal stories seem to be considered too radical, ideological, and theoretical to make it into many special education scholarly outlets. We argue that experimental qualitative designs have much to contribute to the fields of special education and disability studies and, hence, should reach those who receive or provide services to people with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":76152,"journal":{"name":"Mental retardation","volume":"43 2","pages":"92-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43<92:IOEAWA>2.0.CO;2","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of experimental as well as empirical qualitative studies in special education.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Brantlinger,&nbsp;Janette Klingner,&nbsp;Virginia Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43<92:IOEAWA>2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the past few decades qualitative research has increasingly appeared in special education journals. However, much of this work falls within the parameters of producing useful technical information that can be applied to the contexts where children and adults with disabilities learn, work, and live. Experimental qualitative studies that rely on postmodern or poststructural analyses, critical theory, and narrative research with subjective personal stories seem to be considered too radical, ideological, and theoretical to make it into many special education scholarly outlets. We argue that experimental qualitative designs have much to contribute to the fields of special education and disability studies and, hence, should reach those who receive or provide services to people with disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental retardation\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"92-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43<92:IOEAWA>2.0.CO;2\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental retardation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43<92:IOEAWA>2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental retardation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43<92:IOEAWA>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

在过去的几十年里,定性研究越来越多地出现在特殊教育期刊上。然而,这项工作的大部分都是在提供有用的技术信息的范围之内,这些信息可以应用于残疾儿童和成人学习、工作和生活的环境。依赖于后现代或后结构分析、批判理论和主观个人故事的叙事研究的实验定性研究似乎被认为过于激进、意识形态化和理论化,无法进入许多特殊教育学术渠道。我们认为,实验定性设计对特殊教育和残疾研究领域有很大贡献,因此,应该惠及那些接受或为残疾人提供服务的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Importance of experimental as well as empirical qualitative studies in special education.

In the past few decades qualitative research has increasingly appeared in special education journals. However, much of this work falls within the parameters of producing useful technical information that can be applied to the contexts where children and adults with disabilities learn, work, and live. Experimental qualitative studies that rely on postmodern or poststructural analyses, critical theory, and narrative research with subjective personal stories seem to be considered too radical, ideological, and theoretical to make it into many special education scholarly outlets. We argue that experimental qualitative designs have much to contribute to the fields of special education and disability studies and, hence, should reach those who receive or provide services to people with disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信