基于问卷调查的日本电脑化病案系统成本分析与评估。

W P Zhang, K Yamauchi, S Mizuno, R Zhang, D M Huang
{"title":"基于问卷调查的日本电脑化病案系统成本分析与评估。","authors":"W P Zhang,&nbsp;K Yamauchi,&nbsp;S Mizuno,&nbsp;R Zhang,&nbsp;D M Huang","doi":"10.1080/14639230400005990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to clarify the implementation and maintenance costs of a computerized patient record (CPR) system by means of a questionnaire survey. Moreover, the benefits of CPR systems were evaluated to determine their contribution to enhancing the quality of medical care and hospital management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected by a questionnaire survey mailed out to participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The per-bed mean cost for implementation was 14,308 dollars (range: 3538-38,077 dollars). The mean annual maintenance cost for the CPR system was 457,615 dollars (range: 39,769-2,307,692 dollars). The multivariate analysis (Hayashi's Quantification Type I) revealed high partial correlation coefficients between implementation cost and the CPR system maker. In addition, the multiple correlation coefficient for four factors (CPR system maker, number of servers, institution type and implementation date) in predicting implementation cost was 0.798. Over 60% of respondents replied that their satisfaction with the CPR system was 'very high' or 'high.' Eighty-two percent of the hospitals responded positively that CPR systems improve the quality of medical care, and 70% felt that the systems help prevent medical errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that the maker of CPR system, number of servers, institution type and implementation date had a strong influence on per-bed implementation costs in that order. Finally, it was found that CPR systems were considered effective for hospital administration and medical examinations, based on the high assessments of the results of installing a CPR system.</p>","PeriodicalId":80069,"journal":{"name":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","volume":"29 3-4","pages":"229-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639230400005990","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of cost and assessment of computerized patient record systems in Japan based on questionnaire survey.\",\"authors\":\"W P Zhang,&nbsp;K Yamauchi,&nbsp;S Mizuno,&nbsp;R Zhang,&nbsp;D M Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14639230400005990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to clarify the implementation and maintenance costs of a computerized patient record (CPR) system by means of a questionnaire survey. Moreover, the benefits of CPR systems were evaluated to determine their contribution to enhancing the quality of medical care and hospital management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected by a questionnaire survey mailed out to participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The per-bed mean cost for implementation was 14,308 dollars (range: 3538-38,077 dollars). The mean annual maintenance cost for the CPR system was 457,615 dollars (range: 39,769-2,307,692 dollars). The multivariate analysis (Hayashi's Quantification Type I) revealed high partial correlation coefficients between implementation cost and the CPR system maker. In addition, the multiple correlation coefficient for four factors (CPR system maker, number of servers, institution type and implementation date) in predicting implementation cost was 0.798. Over 60% of respondents replied that their satisfaction with the CPR system was 'very high' or 'high.' Eighty-two percent of the hospitals responded positively that CPR systems improve the quality of medical care, and 70% felt that the systems help prevent medical errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that the maker of CPR system, number of servers, institution type and implementation date had a strong influence on per-bed implementation costs in that order. Finally, it was found that CPR systems were considered effective for hospital administration and medical examinations, based on the high assessments of the results of installing a CPR system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 3-4\",\"pages\":\"229-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639230400005990\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230400005990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230400005990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是通过问卷调查的方式来阐明计算机病历(CPR)系统的实施和维护成本。此外,评估心肺复苏术系统的效益,以确定其对提高医疗保健质量和医院管理的贡献。方法:采用邮寄问卷的方式收集资料。结果:每床平均实施成本为14308美元(范围:3538-38,077美元)。心肺复苏术系统的年平均维护费为457615美元(39769 ~ 2307692美元)。多变量分析(Hayashi’s Quantification Type I)显示实施成本与CPR系统制造商之间存在较高的偏相关系数。此外,预测实施成本的4个因素(CPR系统制造商、服务器数量、机构类型和实施日期)的多重相关系数为0.798。超过60%的受访者回答说,他们对心肺复苏系统的满意度“非常高”或“高”。82%的医院积极回应心肺复苏术系统提高了医疗质量,70%的医院认为该系统有助于预防医疗差错。结论:心肺复苏系统的制造商、服务器数量、机构类型和实施日期对每床实施成本的影响程度依次为:最后,基于对安装心肺复苏术系统的结果的高评价,发现心肺复苏术系统被认为对医院管理和医学检查有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of cost and assessment of computerized patient record systems in Japan based on questionnaire survey.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the implementation and maintenance costs of a computerized patient record (CPR) system by means of a questionnaire survey. Moreover, the benefits of CPR systems were evaluated to determine their contribution to enhancing the quality of medical care and hospital management.

Methods: Data were collected by a questionnaire survey mailed out to participants.

Results: The per-bed mean cost for implementation was 14,308 dollars (range: 3538-38,077 dollars). The mean annual maintenance cost for the CPR system was 457,615 dollars (range: 39,769-2,307,692 dollars). The multivariate analysis (Hayashi's Quantification Type I) revealed high partial correlation coefficients between implementation cost and the CPR system maker. In addition, the multiple correlation coefficient for four factors (CPR system maker, number of servers, institution type and implementation date) in predicting implementation cost was 0.798. Over 60% of respondents replied that their satisfaction with the CPR system was 'very high' or 'high.' Eighty-two percent of the hospitals responded positively that CPR systems improve the quality of medical care, and 70% felt that the systems help prevent medical errors.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the maker of CPR system, number of servers, institution type and implementation date had a strong influence on per-bed implementation costs in that order. Finally, it was found that CPR systems were considered effective for hospital administration and medical examinations, based on the high assessments of the results of installing a CPR system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信