储存和新制三溴乙醇对ICR小鼠的疗效和安全性。

Christine C Lieggi, James E Artwohl, Jori K Leszczynski, Nancy A Rodriguez, Barry L Fickbohm, Jeffrey D Fortman
{"title":"储存和新制三溴乙醇对ICR小鼠的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Christine C Lieggi,&nbsp;James E Artwohl,&nbsp;Jori K Leszczynski,&nbsp;Nancy A Rodriguez,&nbsp;Barry L Fickbohm,&nbsp;Jeffrey D Fortman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study, performed in conjunction with an in vitro evaluation of tribromoethanol (TBE), consisted of three trials with three objectives. The first objective was to compare anesthetic efficacy and short-term pathologic findings of TBE, ketamine-xylazine (K-X), and sodium pentobarbital (NaP). The second objective was to evaluate how changes of TBE that occur during the perceived most favorable and least favorable storage conditions (8 weeks at 5 degrees C in the dark [5D] and 25 degrees C with exposure to light [25L], respectively) affect anesthetic efficacy and short-term pathology when compared to newly prepared TBE. The third objective was to perform a 6-week clinical assessment of animals that received newly prepared TBE. All animals that received TBE (400 mg/kg) and 14 of 15 that received K-X (K, 120 mg/kg; X, 16 mg/kg) were anesthetized, as defined by loss of pedal reflex. In comparison, only 8 of 15 animals administered NaP (60 mg/kg) were anesthetized. Anesthetic duration for animals that received K-X was 31.7 min, which was significantly (P = 0.0085) longer than animals that received TBE (18.5 min). Recovery times for TBE and K-X were not significantly different (26.5 and 27.5 min, respectively). Pathologic lesions associated with TBE administration were significantly (P = 0.001) greater than those associated with K-X. NaP was not associated with any pathologic lesions. The pH of newly prepared and 5D TBE was 6.5 to 7.0, whereas that for 25L TBE was 3.0. Anesthetic induction, duration, recovery times, and pathologic lesions were not significantly different, regardless of the pH or storage condition of the solution. It was noted, however, that the average anesthetic duration for animals administered newly prepared TBE in the second trial was longer (37.7 min) than the first trial that used newly prepared TBE. For the third trial (long-term clinical assessment), the average anesthetic duration for TBE was 46.5 min, significantly (P < 0.025) longer when compared to the first trial that used newly prepared TBE. During the third trial, 10 animals were found dead or moribund. All animals that were found moribund were necropsied and found to exhibit a marked ileus. Because of the variability in anesthetic effectiveness, pathology, and morbidity and mortality associated with the use of TBE, we do not recommend the use of this anesthetic agent in ICR mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":80269,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science","volume":"44 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of stored and newly prepared tribromoethanol in ICR mice.\",\"authors\":\"Christine C Lieggi,&nbsp;James E Artwohl,&nbsp;Jori K Leszczynski,&nbsp;Nancy A Rodriguez,&nbsp;Barry L Fickbohm,&nbsp;Jeffrey D Fortman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study, performed in conjunction with an in vitro evaluation of tribromoethanol (TBE), consisted of three trials with three objectives. The first objective was to compare anesthetic efficacy and short-term pathologic findings of TBE, ketamine-xylazine (K-X), and sodium pentobarbital (NaP). The second objective was to evaluate how changes of TBE that occur during the perceived most favorable and least favorable storage conditions (8 weeks at 5 degrees C in the dark [5D] and 25 degrees C with exposure to light [25L], respectively) affect anesthetic efficacy and short-term pathology when compared to newly prepared TBE. The third objective was to perform a 6-week clinical assessment of animals that received newly prepared TBE. All animals that received TBE (400 mg/kg) and 14 of 15 that received K-X (K, 120 mg/kg; X, 16 mg/kg) were anesthetized, as defined by loss of pedal reflex. In comparison, only 8 of 15 animals administered NaP (60 mg/kg) were anesthetized. Anesthetic duration for animals that received K-X was 31.7 min, which was significantly (P = 0.0085) longer than animals that received TBE (18.5 min). Recovery times for TBE and K-X were not significantly different (26.5 and 27.5 min, respectively). Pathologic lesions associated with TBE administration were significantly (P = 0.001) greater than those associated with K-X. NaP was not associated with any pathologic lesions. The pH of newly prepared and 5D TBE was 6.5 to 7.0, whereas that for 25L TBE was 3.0. Anesthetic induction, duration, recovery times, and pathologic lesions were not significantly different, regardless of the pH or storage condition of the solution. It was noted, however, that the average anesthetic duration for animals administered newly prepared TBE in the second trial was longer (37.7 min) than the first trial that used newly prepared TBE. For the third trial (long-term clinical assessment), the average anesthetic duration for TBE was 46.5 min, significantly (P < 0.025) longer when compared to the first trial that used newly prepared TBE. During the third trial, 10 animals were found dead or moribund. All animals that were found moribund were necropsied and found to exhibit a marked ileus. Because of the variability in anesthetic effectiveness, pathology, and morbidity and mortality associated with the use of TBE, we do not recommend the use of this anesthetic agent in ICR mice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"17-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究与三溴乙醇(TBE)的体外评价一起进行,包括三个试验,有三个目的。第一个目的是比较TBE、氯胺酮-二嗪(K-X)和戊巴比妥钠(NaP)的麻醉效果和短期病理表现。第二个目的是评估与新制备的TBE相比,TBE在最有利和最不利的储存条件下(分别在5℃的黑暗条件下[5D]和25℃的光照条件下[25L]保存8周)发生的变化如何影响麻醉效果和短期病理。第三个目标是对接受新制备TBE的动物进行为期6周的临床评估。所有接受TBE (400 mg/kg)的动物和15只接受K- x (K, 120 mg/kg)的动物中的14只;X, 16 mg/kg)被麻醉,定义为踏板反射丧失。相比之下,给予NaP (60 mg/kg)的15只动物中只有8只被麻醉。K-X组麻醉时间为31.7 min,显著长于TBE组(18.5 min) (P = 0.0085)。TBE和K-X的恢复时间无显著差异(分别为26.5 min和27.5 min)。与TBE相关的病理病变明显(P = 0.001)大于与K-X相关的病变。NaP与任何病理病变无关。新制备和5D TBE的pH为6.5 ~ 7.0,而25L TBE的pH为3.0。麻醉诱导、持续时间、恢复时间和病理病变无显著差异,无论溶液的pH或储存条件如何。然而,值得注意的是,在第二次试验中,使用新制备的TBE的动物的平均麻醉时间比使用新制备的TBE的第一次试验更长(37.7分钟)。在第三个试验(长期临床评估)中,TBE的平均麻醉时间为46.5分钟,与使用新制备的TBE的第一个试验相比,显著延长(P < 0.025)。在第三次试验中,10只动物被发现死亡或濒临死亡。所有死亡的动物都经过尸检,发现有明显的肠梗阻。由于与TBE使用相关的麻醉效果、病理、发病率和死亡率的可变性,我们不建议在ICR小鼠中使用这种麻醉剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of stored and newly prepared tribromoethanol in ICR mice.

This study, performed in conjunction with an in vitro evaluation of tribromoethanol (TBE), consisted of three trials with three objectives. The first objective was to compare anesthetic efficacy and short-term pathologic findings of TBE, ketamine-xylazine (K-X), and sodium pentobarbital (NaP). The second objective was to evaluate how changes of TBE that occur during the perceived most favorable and least favorable storage conditions (8 weeks at 5 degrees C in the dark [5D] and 25 degrees C with exposure to light [25L], respectively) affect anesthetic efficacy and short-term pathology when compared to newly prepared TBE. The third objective was to perform a 6-week clinical assessment of animals that received newly prepared TBE. All animals that received TBE (400 mg/kg) and 14 of 15 that received K-X (K, 120 mg/kg; X, 16 mg/kg) were anesthetized, as defined by loss of pedal reflex. In comparison, only 8 of 15 animals administered NaP (60 mg/kg) were anesthetized. Anesthetic duration for animals that received K-X was 31.7 min, which was significantly (P = 0.0085) longer than animals that received TBE (18.5 min). Recovery times for TBE and K-X were not significantly different (26.5 and 27.5 min, respectively). Pathologic lesions associated with TBE administration were significantly (P = 0.001) greater than those associated with K-X. NaP was not associated with any pathologic lesions. The pH of newly prepared and 5D TBE was 6.5 to 7.0, whereas that for 25L TBE was 3.0. Anesthetic induction, duration, recovery times, and pathologic lesions were not significantly different, regardless of the pH or storage condition of the solution. It was noted, however, that the average anesthetic duration for animals administered newly prepared TBE in the second trial was longer (37.7 min) than the first trial that used newly prepared TBE. For the third trial (long-term clinical assessment), the average anesthetic duration for TBE was 46.5 min, significantly (P < 0.025) longer when compared to the first trial that used newly prepared TBE. During the third trial, 10 animals were found dead or moribund. All animals that were found moribund were necropsied and found to exhibit a marked ileus. Because of the variability in anesthetic effectiveness, pathology, and morbidity and mortality associated with the use of TBE, we do not recommend the use of this anesthetic agent in ICR mice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信