大鼠离体胸主动脉不同去内皮化方法的比较。

C Uluoglu, H Zengil
{"title":"大鼠离体胸主动脉不同去内皮化方法的比较。","authors":"C Uluoglu,&nbsp;H Zengil","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different techniques used for deendothelization on responses to endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine) and -independent (sodium nitroprusside) vasodilators and vasoconstrictor (phenylephrine) in the isolated rat thoracic aorta. Four different methods were used for de-endothelization: (1) mechanical (wire), (2) physical (distilled water), (3) chemical (Triton X-100 and saponin) and (4) enzymatic (trypsin). The results showed that mechanical rubbing with rough-surfaced wire was the most effective procedure amongst five different techniques used for deendothelization in the isolated rat thoracic rings. Denudation by wire abolished endothelium-dependent relaxation successfully without much interfering smooth muscle vasodilating and contracting properties of the agonists. It seems that physical, chemical and enzymatic techniques are not suitable for endothelial denudation in the isolated thoracic rat aorta preparations. These endothelium removing methods may be useful for studying the role of endothelium in vascular beds or small diameter vessels whose endothelial cells can not be removed mechanically.</p>","PeriodicalId":21045,"journal":{"name":"Research communications in molecular pathology and pharmacology","volume":"113-114 ","pages":"289-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different de-endothelization procedures in the isolated rat thoracic aorta: a short communication.\",\"authors\":\"C Uluoglu,&nbsp;H Zengil\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different techniques used for deendothelization on responses to endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine) and -independent (sodium nitroprusside) vasodilators and vasoconstrictor (phenylephrine) in the isolated rat thoracic aorta. Four different methods were used for de-endothelization: (1) mechanical (wire), (2) physical (distilled water), (3) chemical (Triton X-100 and saponin) and (4) enzymatic (trypsin). The results showed that mechanical rubbing with rough-surfaced wire was the most effective procedure amongst five different techniques used for deendothelization in the isolated rat thoracic rings. Denudation by wire abolished endothelium-dependent relaxation successfully without much interfering smooth muscle vasodilating and contracting properties of the agonists. It seems that physical, chemical and enzymatic techniques are not suitable for endothelial denudation in the isolated thoracic rat aorta preparations. These endothelium removing methods may be useful for studying the role of endothelium in vascular beds or small diameter vessels whose endothelial cells can not be removed mechanically.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research communications in molecular pathology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"113-114 \",\"pages\":\"289-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research communications in molecular pathology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research communications in molecular pathology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较不同的去内皮技术对离体大鼠胸主动脉内皮依赖性(乙酰胆碱)和非依赖性(硝普钠)血管扩张剂和血管收缩剂(苯肾上腺素)反应的影响。四种不同的去内皮方法:(1)机械(金属丝),(2)物理(蒸馏水),(3)化学(Triton X-100和皂苷)和(4)酶(胰蛋白酶)。结果表明,在5种不同的方法中,粗面金属丝机械摩擦法对离体大鼠胸环去内皮的效果最好。导线剥除成功地消除了内皮依赖性松弛,而不干扰平滑肌血管舒张和收缩激动剂的特性。物理、化学和酶技术似乎不适合在离体胸大鼠主动脉制备中进行内皮剥脱。这些方法可用于研究内皮细胞不能机械去除的血管床或小直径血管中内皮的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of different de-endothelization procedures in the isolated rat thoracic aorta: a short communication.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different techniques used for deendothelization on responses to endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine) and -independent (sodium nitroprusside) vasodilators and vasoconstrictor (phenylephrine) in the isolated rat thoracic aorta. Four different methods were used for de-endothelization: (1) mechanical (wire), (2) physical (distilled water), (3) chemical (Triton X-100 and saponin) and (4) enzymatic (trypsin). The results showed that mechanical rubbing with rough-surfaced wire was the most effective procedure amongst five different techniques used for deendothelization in the isolated rat thoracic rings. Denudation by wire abolished endothelium-dependent relaxation successfully without much interfering smooth muscle vasodilating and contracting properties of the agonists. It seems that physical, chemical and enzymatic techniques are not suitable for endothelial denudation in the isolated thoracic rat aorta preparations. These endothelium removing methods may be useful for studying the role of endothelium in vascular beds or small diameter vessels whose endothelial cells can not be removed mechanically.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信