腕管综合征:术中结构改变与临床和电诊断严重程度的比较

D. Tuncali, A. Yuksel Barutcu, A. Terzioglu, G. Aslan
{"title":"腕管综合征:术中结构改变与临床和电诊断严重程度的比较","authors":"D. Tuncali,&nbsp;A. Yuksel Barutcu,&nbsp;A. Terzioglu,&nbsp;G. Aslan","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2005.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study is to grade the intraoperative findings seen in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) based on severity, and compare it with clinical and electrodiagnostic severity.</p><p>Thirty-one hands surgically treated for CTS were graded according to the severity of clinical signs, and electrodiagnostic tests. Oedema, vascularisation, and fibrosis were graded on a scale of 1–3. Pseudoneuroma or ‘hour-glass’ formation were graded as either 0 or 1. The hands were allocated by an observer into an assumptive severity group, from grade 1 to 3. Clinical severity and electrodiagnostic severity were statistically compared with each other, and with each intraoperative severity criteria.</p><p>A high statistical correlation (<em>p</em>&lt;0.01) was found between clinical severity and vascularisation, fibrosis, and the assumptive intraoperative severity. No correlation could be demonstrated between electrodiagnostic severity and the intraoperative criteria.</p><p>Intraoperative grading should be regarded as a supportive measure to the clinical evaluation in order to obtain a sound base for surgical intervention and internal neurolysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9252,"journal":{"name":"British journal of plastic surgery","volume":"58 8","pages":"Pages 1136-1142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.05.010","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison of intraoperative structural changes with clinical and electrodiagnostic severity\",\"authors\":\"D. Tuncali,&nbsp;A. Yuksel Barutcu,&nbsp;A. Terzioglu,&nbsp;G. Aslan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2005.05.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study is to grade the intraoperative findings seen in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) based on severity, and compare it with clinical and electrodiagnostic severity.</p><p>Thirty-one hands surgically treated for CTS were graded according to the severity of clinical signs, and electrodiagnostic tests. Oedema, vascularisation, and fibrosis were graded on a scale of 1–3. Pseudoneuroma or ‘hour-glass’ formation were graded as either 0 or 1. The hands were allocated by an observer into an assumptive severity group, from grade 1 to 3. Clinical severity and electrodiagnostic severity were statistically compared with each other, and with each intraoperative severity criteria.</p><p>A high statistical correlation (<em>p</em>&lt;0.01) was found between clinical severity and vascularisation, fibrosis, and the assumptive intraoperative severity. No correlation could be demonstrated between electrodiagnostic severity and the intraoperative criteria.</p><p>Intraoperative grading should be regarded as a supportive measure to the clinical evaluation in order to obtain a sound base for surgical intervention and internal neurolysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of plastic surgery\",\"volume\":\"58 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1136-1142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.05.010\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of plastic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007122605001840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007122605001840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

本研究的目的是根据严重程度对腕管综合征(CTS)的术中表现进行分级,并将其与临床和电诊断的严重程度进行比较。根据临床症状的严重程度和电诊断测试对31例手术治疗CTS的手进行分级。水肿、血管化和纤维化按1-3分进行分级。假性神经瘤或“沙漏状”形成分级为0或1。这些手由一名观察员分配到一个假定的严重程度组,从1级到3级。将临床严重程度与电诊断严重程度进行统计学比较,并与术中各严重程度标准进行统计学比较。临床严重程度与血管化、纤维化和假定的术中严重程度之间存在高度的统计学相关性(p < 0.01)。电诊断严重程度与术中标准之间没有相关性。术中分级应作为临床评价的辅助措施,为手术干预和内神经松解术提供良好的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison of intraoperative structural changes with clinical and electrodiagnostic severity

The aim of this study is to grade the intraoperative findings seen in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) based on severity, and compare it with clinical and electrodiagnostic severity.

Thirty-one hands surgically treated for CTS were graded according to the severity of clinical signs, and electrodiagnostic tests. Oedema, vascularisation, and fibrosis were graded on a scale of 1–3. Pseudoneuroma or ‘hour-glass’ formation were graded as either 0 or 1. The hands were allocated by an observer into an assumptive severity group, from grade 1 to 3. Clinical severity and electrodiagnostic severity were statistically compared with each other, and with each intraoperative severity criteria.

A high statistical correlation (p<0.01) was found between clinical severity and vascularisation, fibrosis, and the assumptive intraoperative severity. No correlation could be demonstrated between electrodiagnostic severity and the intraoperative criteria.

Intraoperative grading should be regarded as a supportive measure to the clinical evaluation in order to obtain a sound base for surgical intervention and internal neurolysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信