初级保健机构管理者的知识审计:首要任务是如何使用常规收集的临床数据来提高质量。

Simon De Lusignan, Sally Wells, Adrienne Shaw, Gill Rowlands, Tessa Crilly
{"title":"初级保健机构管理者的知识审计:首要任务是如何使用常规收集的临床数据来提高质量。","authors":"Simon De Lusignan,&nbsp;Sally Wells,&nbsp;Adrienne Shaw,&nbsp;Gill Rowlands,&nbsp;Tessa Crilly","doi":"10.1080/14639230400028455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Technology has provided improved access to the rapidly expanding evidence base and to computerized clinical data recorded as part of routine care. A knowledge audit identifies from within this mass of information the knowledge requirements of a professional group or organization, enabling implementation of an appropriately tailored knowledge-management strategy. The objective of the study is to describe perceived knowledge gaps and recommend an appropriate knowledge-management strategy for primary care. The sample comprised 18 senior managers of Primary Care Trusts: the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, or Research and Development Lead. A series of interviews were recorded verbatim, transcribed and analysed. Knowledge requirements were broad, suggesting that a broadly based knowledge-management strategy is needed in primary care. The biggest gap in current knowledge identified is how to perform needs assessment and quality improvement using aggregated routinely collected, general practice computer data.</p>","PeriodicalId":80069,"journal":{"name":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"69-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639230400028455","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A knowledge audit of the managers of primary care organizations: top priority is how to use routinely collected clinical data for quality improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Simon De Lusignan,&nbsp;Sally Wells,&nbsp;Adrienne Shaw,&nbsp;Gill Rowlands,&nbsp;Tessa Crilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14639230400028455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Technology has provided improved access to the rapidly expanding evidence base and to computerized clinical data recorded as part of routine care. A knowledge audit identifies from within this mass of information the knowledge requirements of a professional group or organization, enabling implementation of an appropriately tailored knowledge-management strategy. The objective of the study is to describe perceived knowledge gaps and recommend an appropriate knowledge-management strategy for primary care. The sample comprised 18 senior managers of Primary Care Trusts: the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, or Research and Development Lead. A series of interviews were recorded verbatim, transcribed and analysed. Knowledge requirements were broad, suggesting that a broadly based knowledge-management strategy is needed in primary care. The biggest gap in current knowledge identified is how to perform needs assessment and quality improvement using aggregated routinely collected, general practice computer data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"69-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639230400028455\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230400028455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230400028455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

技术已经改善了对迅速扩大的证据基础和作为常规护理一部分记录的计算机化临床数据的访问。知识审计从大量信息中识别出专业团队或组织的知识需求,从而实现适当定制的知识管理策略。该研究的目的是描述感知到的知识差距,并建议适当的初级保健知识管理策略。样本包括初级保健信托基金的18名高级管理人员:董事长、首席执行官或研发主管。对一系列访谈进行了逐字记录、转录和分析。知识要求是广泛的,这表明初级保健需要一个基础广泛的知识管理战略。目前认识到的最大差距是如何利用常规收集的综合计算机数据进行需求评估和质量改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A knowledge audit of the managers of primary care organizations: top priority is how to use routinely collected clinical data for quality improvement.

Technology has provided improved access to the rapidly expanding evidence base and to computerized clinical data recorded as part of routine care. A knowledge audit identifies from within this mass of information the knowledge requirements of a professional group or organization, enabling implementation of an appropriately tailored knowledge-management strategy. The objective of the study is to describe perceived knowledge gaps and recommend an appropriate knowledge-management strategy for primary care. The sample comprised 18 senior managers of Primary Care Trusts: the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, or Research and Development Lead. A series of interviews were recorded verbatim, transcribed and analysed. Knowledge requirements were broad, suggesting that a broadly based knowledge-management strategy is needed in primary care. The biggest gap in current knowledge identified is how to perform needs assessment and quality improvement using aggregated routinely collected, general practice computer data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信