[根据Enderlein暗场显微镜是否可以诊断癌症?前瞻性研究]。

Samer El-Safadi, Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg, Richard von Georgi, Karsten Münstedt, Friede Brück
{"title":"[根据Enderlein暗场显微镜是否可以诊断癌症?前瞻性研究]。","authors":"Samer El-Safadi,&nbsp;Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg,&nbsp;Richard von Georgi,&nbsp;Karsten Münstedt,&nbsp;Friede Brück","doi":"10.1159/000085212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dark field microscopy according to Enderlin claims to be able to detect forthcoming or beginning cancer at an early stage through minute abnormalities in the blood. In Germany and the USA, this method is used by an increasing number of physicians and health practitioners (non-medically qualified complementary practitioners), because this easy test seems to give important information about patients' health status.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Can dark field microscopy reliably detect cancer?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the course of a prospective study on iridology, blood samples were drawn for dark field microscopy in 110 patients. A health practitioner with several years of training in the field carried out the examination without prior information about the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 12 patients with present tumor metastasis as confirmed by radiological methods (CT, MRI or ultra-sound) 3 were correctly identified. Analysis of sensitivity (0.25), specificity (0.64), positive (0.09) and negative (0.85) predictive values revealed unsatisfactory results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dark field micoroscopy does not seem to reliably detect the presence of cancer. Clinical use of the method can therefore not be recommended until future studies are conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":80278,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","volume":"12 3","pages":"148-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000085212","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Does dark field microscopy according to Enderlein allow for cancer diagnosis? A prospective study].\",\"authors\":\"Samer El-Safadi,&nbsp;Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg,&nbsp;Richard von Georgi,&nbsp;Karsten Münstedt,&nbsp;Friede Brück\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000085212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dark field microscopy according to Enderlin claims to be able to detect forthcoming or beginning cancer at an early stage through minute abnormalities in the blood. In Germany and the USA, this method is used by an increasing number of physicians and health practitioners (non-medically qualified complementary practitioners), because this easy test seems to give important information about patients' health status.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Can dark field microscopy reliably detect cancer?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the course of a prospective study on iridology, blood samples were drawn for dark field microscopy in 110 patients. A health practitioner with several years of training in the field carried out the examination without prior information about the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 12 patients with present tumor metastasis as confirmed by radiological methods (CT, MRI or ultra-sound) 3 were correctly identified. Analysis of sensitivity (0.25), specificity (0.64), positive (0.09) and negative (0.85) predictive values revealed unsatisfactory results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dark field micoroscopy does not seem to reliably detect the presence of cancer. Clinical use of the method can therefore not be recommended until future studies are conducted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"148-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000085212\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000085212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2005/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000085212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2005/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:根据Enderlin的说法,暗场显微镜能够通过血液中的微小异常在早期发现即将到来或开始的癌症。在德国和美国,越来越多的医生和卫生从业人员(非医学合格的补充从业人员)使用这种方法,因为这种简单的测试似乎可以提供有关患者健康状况的重要信息。目的:暗场显微镜能可靠地检测癌症吗?材料与方法:在一项虹膜学前瞻性研究中,对110例患者抽取血样进行暗场显微镜观察。一名在该领域受过几年培训的保健医生在没有患者事先信息的情况下进行了检查。结果:12例经影像学检查(CT、MRI或超声)证实有肿瘤转移的患者中,正确识别3例。对敏感性(0.25)、特异性(0.64)、阳性预测值(0.09)和阴性预测值(0.85)的分析显示,结果并不令人满意。结论:暗场显微镜似乎不能可靠地检测癌症的存在。因此,在进行进一步的研究之前,不建议临床使用该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Does dark field microscopy according to Enderlein allow for cancer diagnosis? A prospective study].

Background: Dark field microscopy according to Enderlin claims to be able to detect forthcoming or beginning cancer at an early stage through minute abnormalities in the blood. In Germany and the USA, this method is used by an increasing number of physicians and health practitioners (non-medically qualified complementary practitioners), because this easy test seems to give important information about patients' health status.

Objective: Can dark field microscopy reliably detect cancer?

Materials and methods: In the course of a prospective study on iridology, blood samples were drawn for dark field microscopy in 110 patients. A health practitioner with several years of training in the field carried out the examination without prior information about the patients.

Results: Out of 12 patients with present tumor metastasis as confirmed by radiological methods (CT, MRI or ultra-sound) 3 were correctly identified. Analysis of sensitivity (0.25), specificity (0.64), positive (0.09) and negative (0.85) predictive values revealed unsatisfactory results.

Conclusion: Dark field micoroscopy does not seem to reliably detect the presence of cancer. Clinical use of the method can therefore not be recommended until future studies are conducted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信