职业性乳胶过敏的毒理学和免疫学方面。

Syed M Ahmed, Tar-Ching Aw, Anil Adisesh
{"title":"职业性乳胶过敏的毒理学和免疫学方面。","authors":"Syed M Ahmed,&nbsp;Tar-Ching Aw,&nbsp;Anil Adisesh","doi":"10.2165/00139709-200423020-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Latex allergy continues to be an important occupational health problem as latex products are used increasingly worldwide, particularly in healthcare. Although there are few epidemiological studies on the incidence of latex allergy, there has been an increase in the number of case reports over the last 10 years and, based on skin-prick tests, estimates of prevalence of latex allergy in healthcare workers range from 2% to 17%. The allergic health effects arise either from the latex proteins, generally causing a type I immediate hypersensitivity reaction, or from the chemicals added to latex during processing, causing a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction. Clinical manifestations of latex allergy depend on the route of exposure and occur by direct contact either with skin or mucosa, or by inhalation. The diagnosis of latex allergy is based on the history, skin tests, serological tests and challenge tests. Thirteen latex allergens have been identified and isolated so far from natural rubber latex. They differ in their potential to elicit immunological responses in individuals allergic to latex and thus have been designated as major or minor allergens. In latex gloves, cornstarch powder used as a donning agent carries latex proteins, thereby increasing inhalational and mucosal exposure to latex proteins. There also appears to be a positive correlation between protein content and allergenicity of gloves. The use of powder-free, low-protein gloves is effective in reducing symptoms and markers of sensitisation. Alternatives to latex gloves, such as nitrile or vinyl gloves are available but may be inferior in respect to manual dexterity and biological impermeability.</p>","PeriodicalId":87031,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological reviews","volume":"23 2","pages":"123-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00139709-200423020-00005","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicological and immunological aspects of occupational latex allergy.\",\"authors\":\"Syed M Ahmed,&nbsp;Tar-Ching Aw,&nbsp;Anil Adisesh\",\"doi\":\"10.2165/00139709-200423020-00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Latex allergy continues to be an important occupational health problem as latex products are used increasingly worldwide, particularly in healthcare. Although there are few epidemiological studies on the incidence of latex allergy, there has been an increase in the number of case reports over the last 10 years and, based on skin-prick tests, estimates of prevalence of latex allergy in healthcare workers range from 2% to 17%. The allergic health effects arise either from the latex proteins, generally causing a type I immediate hypersensitivity reaction, or from the chemicals added to latex during processing, causing a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction. Clinical manifestations of latex allergy depend on the route of exposure and occur by direct contact either with skin or mucosa, or by inhalation. The diagnosis of latex allergy is based on the history, skin tests, serological tests and challenge tests. Thirteen latex allergens have been identified and isolated so far from natural rubber latex. They differ in their potential to elicit immunological responses in individuals allergic to latex and thus have been designated as major or minor allergens. In latex gloves, cornstarch powder used as a donning agent carries latex proteins, thereby increasing inhalational and mucosal exposure to latex proteins. There also appears to be a positive correlation between protein content and allergenicity of gloves. The use of powder-free, low-protein gloves is effective in reducing symptoms and markers of sensitisation. Alternatives to latex gloves, such as nitrile or vinyl gloves are available but may be inferior in respect to manual dexterity and biological impermeability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological reviews\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"123-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00139709-200423020-00005\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200423020-00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200423020-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

乳胶过敏仍然是一个重要的职业健康问题,因为乳胶产品在世界范围内的使用越来越多,特别是在医疗保健领域。虽然很少有关于乳胶过敏发生率的流行病学研究,但在过去10年中,病例报告的数量有所增加,根据皮肤点刺试验,卫生保健工作者中乳胶过敏的患病率估计在2%至17%之间。对健康的过敏性影响要么来自乳胶蛋白,通常引起I型即时超敏反应,要么来自加工过程中添加到乳胶中的化学物质,引起IV型延迟超敏反应。乳胶过敏的临床表现取决于接触途径,可通过直接接触皮肤或粘膜或吸入发生。乳胶过敏的诊断是基于病史、皮肤试验、血清学试验和激发试验。到目前为止,已经从天然橡胶乳胶中发现并分离出了13种乳胶过敏原。它们在对乳胶过敏的个体中引起免疫反应的潜力不同,因此被指定为主要或次要过敏原。在乳胶手套中,玉米淀粉粉作为戴帽剂携带乳胶蛋白,从而增加吸入和粘膜暴露于乳胶蛋白。蛋白质含量与手套的致敏性之间也存在正相关关系。使用无粉、低蛋白手套可有效减轻过敏症状和标志。乳胶手套的替代品,如丁腈或乙烯基手套是可用的,但在手工灵巧性和生物不渗透性方面可能较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toxicological and immunological aspects of occupational latex allergy.

Latex allergy continues to be an important occupational health problem as latex products are used increasingly worldwide, particularly in healthcare. Although there are few epidemiological studies on the incidence of latex allergy, there has been an increase in the number of case reports over the last 10 years and, based on skin-prick tests, estimates of prevalence of latex allergy in healthcare workers range from 2% to 17%. The allergic health effects arise either from the latex proteins, generally causing a type I immediate hypersensitivity reaction, or from the chemicals added to latex during processing, causing a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction. Clinical manifestations of latex allergy depend on the route of exposure and occur by direct contact either with skin or mucosa, or by inhalation. The diagnosis of latex allergy is based on the history, skin tests, serological tests and challenge tests. Thirteen latex allergens have been identified and isolated so far from natural rubber latex. They differ in their potential to elicit immunological responses in individuals allergic to latex and thus have been designated as major or minor allergens. In latex gloves, cornstarch powder used as a donning agent carries latex proteins, thereby increasing inhalational and mucosal exposure to latex proteins. There also appears to be a positive correlation between protein content and allergenicity of gloves. The use of powder-free, low-protein gloves is effective in reducing symptoms and markers of sensitisation. Alternatives to latex gloves, such as nitrile or vinyl gloves are available but may be inferior in respect to manual dexterity and biological impermeability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信