经桡动脉入路冠状动脉造影和血管成形术后桡动脉血管痉挛。

Naoto Fukuda, Shin-Ichiro Iwahara, Atsushi Harada, Shinya Yokoyama, Kouichi Akutsu, Masamichi Takano, Akiyoshi Kobayashi, Shingo Kurokawa, Tohru Izumi
{"title":"经桡动脉入路冠状动脉造影和血管成形术后桡动脉血管痉挛。","authors":"Naoto Fukuda,&nbsp;Shin-Ichiro Iwahara,&nbsp;Atsushi Harada,&nbsp;Shinya Yokoyama,&nbsp;Kouichi Akutsu,&nbsp;Masamichi Takano,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Shingo Kurokawa,&nbsp;Tohru Izumi","doi":"10.1536/jhj.45.723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined vasospasms of the radial artery after a transradial approach was used for coronary angiography or angioplasty. In forty-eight patients (39 males and 9 females), arteriography of the radial artery was initially performed just after the transradial approach was used for coronary angiography and/or angioplasty. Then, five months later, a second arteriography of the radial artery was obtained after a transbrachial approach was used for coronary angiography. First and second arteriographies were compared to evaluate vaso-spasms of the radial artery. In the present study, more than 75% stenosis in the radial artery, 25-75% stenosis, and less than 25% stenosis were tentatively defined as severe spasms, moderate spasms, and mild spasms, respectively. In arteriographic studies on the radial artery, twenty-four patients (50%) had severe radial artery spasms, eleven patients (23%) had moderate spasms, and thirteen patients (27%) had mild spasms. The diameters of both the proximal and distal radial arteries in the severe spasm group were significantly smaller than those in the mild and moderate spasm groups (proximal site: severe group 2.39 +/- 0.70 mm versus mild group 2.98 +/- 0.46 mm, P < 0.05, and moderate group 2.96 +/- 0.77 mm, P < 0.05, distal site: severe group 2.26 +/- 0.60 mm versus mild group 2.73 +/- 0.47 mm, P < 0.05, and moderate group 2.86 +/- 0.71 mm, P < 0.05). We concluded that vasospasms of the radial artery occurred in most patients after the transradial approach. Furthermore, severe radial spasms were strongly correlated with the size of the diameter of the artery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14717,"journal":{"name":"Japanese heart journal","volume":"45 5","pages":"723-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1536/jhj.45.723","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vasospasms of the radial artery after the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Naoto Fukuda,&nbsp;Shin-Ichiro Iwahara,&nbsp;Atsushi Harada,&nbsp;Shinya Yokoyama,&nbsp;Kouichi Akutsu,&nbsp;Masamichi Takano,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Shingo Kurokawa,&nbsp;Tohru Izumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1536/jhj.45.723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We examined vasospasms of the radial artery after a transradial approach was used for coronary angiography or angioplasty. In forty-eight patients (39 males and 9 females), arteriography of the radial artery was initially performed just after the transradial approach was used for coronary angiography and/or angioplasty. Then, five months later, a second arteriography of the radial artery was obtained after a transbrachial approach was used for coronary angiography. First and second arteriographies were compared to evaluate vaso-spasms of the radial artery. In the present study, more than 75% stenosis in the radial artery, 25-75% stenosis, and less than 25% stenosis were tentatively defined as severe spasms, moderate spasms, and mild spasms, respectively. In arteriographic studies on the radial artery, twenty-four patients (50%) had severe radial artery spasms, eleven patients (23%) had moderate spasms, and thirteen patients (27%) had mild spasms. The diameters of both the proximal and distal radial arteries in the severe spasm group were significantly smaller than those in the mild and moderate spasm groups (proximal site: severe group 2.39 +/- 0.70 mm versus mild group 2.98 +/- 0.46 mm, P < 0.05, and moderate group 2.96 +/- 0.77 mm, P < 0.05, distal site: severe group 2.26 +/- 0.60 mm versus mild group 2.73 +/- 0.47 mm, P < 0.05, and moderate group 2.86 +/- 0.71 mm, P < 0.05). We concluded that vasospasms of the radial artery occurred in most patients after the transradial approach. Furthermore, severe radial spasms were strongly correlated with the size of the diameter of the artery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese heart journal\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"723-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1536/jhj.45.723\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

我们检查了经桡动脉入路进行冠状动脉造影或血管成形术后桡动脉的血管痉挛。在48例患者中(男性39例,女性9例),在经桡动脉入路进行冠状动脉造影和/或血管成形术后,首先进行桡动脉造影。然后,5个月后,经肱入路冠状动脉造影后,进行第二次桡动脉造影。第一次和第二次动脉造影比较评估桡动脉血管痉挛。在本研究中,桡动脉狭窄超过75%、狭窄25-75%和狭窄小于25%暂定为重度痉挛、中度痉挛和轻度痉挛。在桡动脉造影研究中,24例患者(50%)有严重的桡动脉痉挛,11例患者(23%)有中度痉挛,13例患者(27%)有轻度痉挛。近端和远端直径的径向动脉严重痉挛组明显小于轻度和中度痉挛组(近端站点:严重组2.39 + / - 0.70毫米与轻度组2.98 + / - 0.46毫米,P < 0.05,中等组2.96 + / - 0.77毫米,P < 0.05,远端站点:严重组2.26 + / - 0.60毫米与轻度组2.73 + / - 0.47毫米,P < 0.05,中等组2.86 + / - 0.71毫米,P < 0.05)。我们得出结论,经桡动脉入路后,大多数患者发生桡动脉血管痉挛。此外,严重的桡动脉痉挛与动脉直径的大小密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vasospasms of the radial artery after the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.

We examined vasospasms of the radial artery after a transradial approach was used for coronary angiography or angioplasty. In forty-eight patients (39 males and 9 females), arteriography of the radial artery was initially performed just after the transradial approach was used for coronary angiography and/or angioplasty. Then, five months later, a second arteriography of the radial artery was obtained after a transbrachial approach was used for coronary angiography. First and second arteriographies were compared to evaluate vaso-spasms of the radial artery. In the present study, more than 75% stenosis in the radial artery, 25-75% stenosis, and less than 25% stenosis were tentatively defined as severe spasms, moderate spasms, and mild spasms, respectively. In arteriographic studies on the radial artery, twenty-four patients (50%) had severe radial artery spasms, eleven patients (23%) had moderate spasms, and thirteen patients (27%) had mild spasms. The diameters of both the proximal and distal radial arteries in the severe spasm group were significantly smaller than those in the mild and moderate spasm groups (proximal site: severe group 2.39 +/- 0.70 mm versus mild group 2.98 +/- 0.46 mm, P < 0.05, and moderate group 2.96 +/- 0.77 mm, P < 0.05, distal site: severe group 2.26 +/- 0.60 mm versus mild group 2.73 +/- 0.47 mm, P < 0.05, and moderate group 2.86 +/- 0.71 mm, P < 0.05). We concluded that vasospasms of the radial artery occurred in most patients after the transradial approach. Furthermore, severe radial spasms were strongly correlated with the size of the diameter of the artery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信