逼尿肌收缩力——混沌中的秩序。

Derek Griffiths
{"title":"逼尿肌收缩力——混沌中的秩序。","authors":"Derek Griffiths","doi":"10.1080/03008880410015426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper comprises a critical assessment of the many competing ways of assessing detrusor contractility in the urodynamic clinic. It is based on measurements made in a group of elderly women, and the conclusions apply, strictly speaking, only to that population. Detrusor contractility has two aspects, which appear to be independent of each other: the strength of the detrusor contraction and whether the contraction is adequately sustained. The second of these can be assessed quite simply from postvoid residual urine. The main aim of the paper therefore is to identify and recommend one or two best methods of measuring detrusor contraction strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For research, the isovolumetric detrusor pressure should be measured during a continuous occlusion test or a mechanical stop test, effected by blocking the outlet with a balloon catheter. For routine clinical use, where ease of performance and minimization of repeat catheterization are important considerations, the isovolumetric detrusor pressure may be estimated from a simple contractility index PIP (=pdet.qmax + Qmax, in the usual urodynamic units). The older indices detrusor coefficient, projected isovolumetric pressure and bladder contractility index, the detrusor power and the well-known contractility nomogram, are not recommended for use in older women. Except for specialized research purposes, the Watts factor does not offer enough advantages to offset the complex calculation required. These conclusions may require modification for male patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":76529,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum","volume":" 215","pages":"93-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03008880410015426","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detrusor contractility--order out of chaos.\",\"authors\":\"Derek Griffiths\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03008880410015426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper comprises a critical assessment of the many competing ways of assessing detrusor contractility in the urodynamic clinic. It is based on measurements made in a group of elderly women, and the conclusions apply, strictly speaking, only to that population. Detrusor contractility has two aspects, which appear to be independent of each other: the strength of the detrusor contraction and whether the contraction is adequately sustained. The second of these can be assessed quite simply from postvoid residual urine. The main aim of the paper therefore is to identify and recommend one or two best methods of measuring detrusor contraction strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For research, the isovolumetric detrusor pressure should be measured during a continuous occlusion test or a mechanical stop test, effected by blocking the outlet with a balloon catheter. For routine clinical use, where ease of performance and minimization of repeat catheterization are important considerations, the isovolumetric detrusor pressure may be estimated from a simple contractility index PIP (=pdet.qmax + Qmax, in the usual urodynamic units). The older indices detrusor coefficient, projected isovolumetric pressure and bladder contractility index, the detrusor power and the well-known contractility nomogram, are not recommended for use in older women. Except for specialized research purposes, the Watts factor does not offer enough advantages to offset the complex calculation required. These conclusions may require modification for male patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\" 215\",\"pages\":\"93-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03008880410015426\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03008880410015426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03008880410015426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

摘要

目的:本文对尿动力学临床中评估逼尿肌收缩力的许多竞争性方法进行了批判性评估。它是基于对一群老年妇女的测量,严格来说,结论只适用于这群人。逼尿肌收缩有两个方面,这两个方面似乎是相互独立的:逼尿肌收缩的强度和收缩是否足够持续。其中第二种可以很简单地从空后残留尿液中进行评估。因此,本文的主要目的是确定并推荐一种或两种测量逼尿肌收缩强度的最佳方法。结论:在研究中,应在连续闭塞试验或机械停止试验中测量等容逼尿肌压力,用球囊导管阻塞出口。对于常规临床应用,方便操作和尽量减少重复置管是重要的考虑因素,可通过简单的收缩指数PIP (=pdet)来估计等容逼尿肌压力。qmax + qmax,一般尿动力学单位)。老年指数逼尿肌系数,预测等容压和膀胱收缩指数,逼尿肌功率和众所周知的收缩力图,不推荐用于老年妇女。除了专门的研究目的,瓦茨系数不能提供足够的优势来抵消所需的复杂计算。这些结论可能需要对男性患者进行修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detrusor contractility--order out of chaos.

Objective: This paper comprises a critical assessment of the many competing ways of assessing detrusor contractility in the urodynamic clinic. It is based on measurements made in a group of elderly women, and the conclusions apply, strictly speaking, only to that population. Detrusor contractility has two aspects, which appear to be independent of each other: the strength of the detrusor contraction and whether the contraction is adequately sustained. The second of these can be assessed quite simply from postvoid residual urine. The main aim of the paper therefore is to identify and recommend one or two best methods of measuring detrusor contraction strength.

Conclusions: For research, the isovolumetric detrusor pressure should be measured during a continuous occlusion test or a mechanical stop test, effected by blocking the outlet with a balloon catheter. For routine clinical use, where ease of performance and minimization of repeat catheterization are important considerations, the isovolumetric detrusor pressure may be estimated from a simple contractility index PIP (=pdet.qmax + Qmax, in the usual urodynamic units). The older indices detrusor coefficient, projected isovolumetric pressure and bladder contractility index, the detrusor power and the well-known contractility nomogram, are not recommended for use in older women. Except for specialized research purposes, the Watts factor does not offer enough advantages to offset the complex calculation required. These conclusions may require modification for male patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信