分享政策议程的精神?私人补充治疗师对在英国国家医疗服务体系执业的态度

Gavin J. Andrews
{"title":"分享政策议程的精神?私人补充治疗师对在英国国家医疗服务体系执业的态度","authors":"Gavin J. Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.ctnm.2003.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During recent years, complementary medicine (CM) has grown as a significant provider of health care in the UK, the majority of this provision being allocated through the small private business sector to privately paying clients. Given the substantial demand for CM, the government acknowledges its structural integration with orthodox medicine (OM) to be a logical progression. However, although the time frame, evidence bases and regulatory structures are as yet undetermined, key to the current emphasis on integration is an underlying assumption that private sector providers would be willing participants, potentially alongside nurses. In this context, using a combined questionnaire (<em>n</em>=426) and interview (<em>n</em>=49) survey, this paper makes an initial exploration and considers the current connections that private therapists have with OM and their attitudes towards collaborating with and working within the NHS. The majority of therapists claimed not to have existing business connections with NHS providers, though many stated that they had established some form of informal arrangements. In general, therapists were happy that they had experienced increasingly positive reactions from orthodox clinicians towards their therapies. The overwhelming majority of therapists were positive about the proposition of working within OM but did have certain reservations. Given the range and intensity of opinion found in this initial investigation, the paper concludes by signposting some substantive avenues of focused research inquiry on the structural integration of CM and OM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79481,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in nursing & midwifery","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 217-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctnm.2003.11.003","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sharing the spirit of the policy agenda? Private complementary therapists’ attitudes towards practising in the British NHS\",\"authors\":\"Gavin J. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctnm.2003.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>During recent years, complementary medicine (CM) has grown as a significant provider of health care in the UK, the majority of this provision being allocated through the small private business sector to privately paying clients. Given the substantial demand for CM, the government acknowledges its structural integration with orthodox medicine (OM) to be a logical progression. However, although the time frame, evidence bases and regulatory structures are as yet undetermined, key to the current emphasis on integration is an underlying assumption that private sector providers would be willing participants, potentially alongside nurses. In this context, using a combined questionnaire (<em>n</em>=426) and interview (<em>n</em>=49) survey, this paper makes an initial exploration and considers the current connections that private therapists have with OM and their attitudes towards collaborating with and working within the NHS. The majority of therapists claimed not to have existing business connections with NHS providers, though many stated that they had established some form of informal arrangements. In general, therapists were happy that they had experienced increasingly positive reactions from orthodox clinicians towards their therapies. The overwhelming majority of therapists were positive about the proposition of working within OM but did have certain reservations. Given the range and intensity of opinion found in this initial investigation, the paper concludes by signposting some substantive avenues of focused research inquiry on the structural integration of CM and OM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary therapies in nursing & midwifery\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 217-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctnm.2003.11.003\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary therapies in nursing & midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353611703001136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in nursing & midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353611703001136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

近年来,补充医学(CM)已成长为英国医疗保健的重要提供者,其中大部分通过小型私营企业部门分配给私人付费客户。鉴于对中医的巨大需求,政府承认中医与传统医学(OM)的结构整合是一个合乎逻辑的进展。然而,尽管时间框架、证据基础和监管结构尚未确定,但目前强调整合的关键是一个基本假设,即私营部门提供者将愿意参与,可能与护士一起。在此背景下,通过问卷调查(n=426)和访谈调查(n=49),本文进行了初步探索,并考虑了私人治疗师与OM的当前联系以及他们对与NHS合作和在NHS内工作的态度。大多数治疗师声称与NHS提供者没有现有的业务联系,尽管许多人表示他们已经建立了某种形式的非正式安排。总的来说,治疗师很高兴他们经历了正统临床医生对他们的治疗越来越积极的反应。绝大多数治疗师对在OM工作的提议持积极态度,但也有一定的保留意见。鉴于在这一初步调查中发现的意见的范围和强度,本文最后指出了一些实质性的途径,重点研究CM和OM的结构整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sharing the spirit of the policy agenda? Private complementary therapists’ attitudes towards practising in the British NHS

During recent years, complementary medicine (CM) has grown as a significant provider of health care in the UK, the majority of this provision being allocated through the small private business sector to privately paying clients. Given the substantial demand for CM, the government acknowledges its structural integration with orthodox medicine (OM) to be a logical progression. However, although the time frame, evidence bases and regulatory structures are as yet undetermined, key to the current emphasis on integration is an underlying assumption that private sector providers would be willing participants, potentially alongside nurses. In this context, using a combined questionnaire (n=426) and interview (n=49) survey, this paper makes an initial exploration and considers the current connections that private therapists have with OM and their attitudes towards collaborating with and working within the NHS. The majority of therapists claimed not to have existing business connections with NHS providers, though many stated that they had established some form of informal arrangements. In general, therapists were happy that they had experienced increasingly positive reactions from orthodox clinicians towards their therapies. The overwhelming majority of therapists were positive about the proposition of working within OM but did have certain reservations. Given the range and intensity of opinion found in this initial investigation, the paper concludes by signposting some substantive avenues of focused research inquiry on the structural integration of CM and OM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信