手术时间和初次全髋关节置换术的生存率:1987-2001年挪威关节置换术登记所报道的当地医院31745例初次骨水泥和非骨水泥全髋关节置换术的分析。

Arvid Småbrekke, Birgitte Espehaug, Leif I Havelin, Ove Furnes
{"title":"手术时间和初次全髋关节置换术的生存率:1987-2001年挪威关节置换术登记所报道的当地医院31745例初次骨水泥和非骨水泥全髋关节置换术的分析。","authors":"Arvid Småbrekke,&nbsp;Birgitte Espehaug,&nbsp;Leif I Havelin,&nbsp;Ove Furnes","doi":"10.1080/00016470410001376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some studies have found a significant decrease in operating time as a result of standardizing programs for hip surgery. To study the influence of operating time (skin to skin) on survival of total hip replacements, we investigated the operating time in local hospitals in Norway. We have found no other large published series of THRs investigating operating time and revision.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was based on 31,745 primary THRs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 47 local hospitals during 1987-2001. Operating time was divided into 7 categories, and for each category separate Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted failure rate ratios were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operating time for all local hospitals in Norway was 96 (68-130) min. Increasing operating volume from less than 10 THRs/hospital/year to more than 200 THRs/hospital/year was associated with a 25-min decrease in mean operating time in cemented THRs and a 35-min decrease in the case of uncemented THRs. With the operating time category of 71-90 min as reference category, cemented THRs that lasted more than 150 min had a two-fold increased (95% CI: 1.6-2.6) revision rate. For uncemented implants, the revision rate was 1.3 times higher (95% CI: 0.8-2.2). Cemented implants with operating time under 51 min and over 90 min were associated with an increased risk of revision due to aseptic loosening. Cemented implants with operating time over 150 min were associated with an increased risk of revision due to infection.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Hospitals with long operating times should consider the potential benefit of reducing these times, as this may lead to lower revision rates and increased operating volumes. Shorter operation times could be achieved by standardization programs, but one should bear in mind that for cemented implants very short operating times also increased revision risk due to aseptic loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":75403,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","volume":"75 5","pages":"524-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001376","citationCount":"103","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operating time and survival of primary total hip replacements: an analysis of 31,745 primary cemented and uncemented total hip replacements from local hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-2001.\",\"authors\":\"Arvid Småbrekke,&nbsp;Birgitte Espehaug,&nbsp;Leif I Havelin,&nbsp;Ove Furnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016470410001376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some studies have found a significant decrease in operating time as a result of standardizing programs for hip surgery. To study the influence of operating time (skin to skin) on survival of total hip replacements, we investigated the operating time in local hospitals in Norway. We have found no other large published series of THRs investigating operating time and revision.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was based on 31,745 primary THRs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 47 local hospitals during 1987-2001. Operating time was divided into 7 categories, and for each category separate Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted failure rate ratios were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operating time for all local hospitals in Norway was 96 (68-130) min. Increasing operating volume from less than 10 THRs/hospital/year to more than 200 THRs/hospital/year was associated with a 25-min decrease in mean operating time in cemented THRs and a 35-min decrease in the case of uncemented THRs. With the operating time category of 71-90 min as reference category, cemented THRs that lasted more than 150 min had a two-fold increased (95% CI: 1.6-2.6) revision rate. For uncemented implants, the revision rate was 1.3 times higher (95% CI: 0.8-2.2). Cemented implants with operating time under 51 min and over 90 min were associated with an increased risk of revision due to aseptic loosening. Cemented implants with operating time over 150 min were associated with an increased risk of revision due to infection.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Hospitals with long operating times should consider the potential benefit of reducing these times, as this may lead to lower revision rates and increased operating volumes. Shorter operation times could be achieved by standardization programs, but one should bear in mind that for cemented implants very short operating times also increased revision risk due to aseptic loosening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"75 5\",\"pages\":\"524-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00016470410001376\",\"citationCount\":\"103\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 103

摘要

背景:一些研究发现,由于髋关节手术程序的标准化,手术时间显著减少。为了研究手术时间(皮肤对皮肤)对全髋关节置换术患者生存的影响,我们调查了挪威当地医院的手术时间。我们还没有发现其他大型已发表的关于手术时间和修订的THRs系列。患者和方法:该研究基于1987-2001年间47家当地医院向挪威关节成形术登记处报告的31745例原发性THRs。将手术时间分为7类,并对每一类分别计算Kaplan-Meier曲线和调整故障率。结果:挪威所有当地医院的平均手术时间为96(68-130)分钟。将手术量从少于10 THRs/医院/年增加到超过200 THRs/医院/年,骨水泥THRs的平均手术时间减少了25分钟,未骨水泥THRs的平均手术时间减少了35分钟。以手术时间71 ~ 90 min为参照,持续时间超过150 min的骨水泥THRs翻修率增加2倍(95% CI: 1.6 ~ 2.6)。对于非骨水泥种植体,修复率高出1.3倍(95% CI: 0.8-2.2)。手术时间小于51分钟和大于90分钟的骨水泥植入物由于无菌性松动导致翻修风险增加。手术时间超过150分钟的骨水泥种植体会增加因感染而进行翻修的风险。解释:手术时间较长的医院应该考虑减少手术时间的潜在好处,因为这可能导致更低的翻修率和更大的手术量。标准化程序可以缩短手术时间,但应该记住,对于骨水泥种植体,非常短的手术时间也增加了由于无菌松动而导致的翻修风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operating time and survival of primary total hip replacements: an analysis of 31,745 primary cemented and uncemented total hip replacements from local hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-2001.

Background: Some studies have found a significant decrease in operating time as a result of standardizing programs for hip surgery. To study the influence of operating time (skin to skin) on survival of total hip replacements, we investigated the operating time in local hospitals in Norway. We have found no other large published series of THRs investigating operating time and revision.

Patients and methods: The study was based on 31,745 primary THRs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 47 local hospitals during 1987-2001. Operating time was divided into 7 categories, and for each category separate Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted failure rate ratios were calculated.

Results: The mean operating time for all local hospitals in Norway was 96 (68-130) min. Increasing operating volume from less than 10 THRs/hospital/year to more than 200 THRs/hospital/year was associated with a 25-min decrease in mean operating time in cemented THRs and a 35-min decrease in the case of uncemented THRs. With the operating time category of 71-90 min as reference category, cemented THRs that lasted more than 150 min had a two-fold increased (95% CI: 1.6-2.6) revision rate. For uncemented implants, the revision rate was 1.3 times higher (95% CI: 0.8-2.2). Cemented implants with operating time under 51 min and over 90 min were associated with an increased risk of revision due to aseptic loosening. Cemented implants with operating time over 150 min were associated with an increased risk of revision due to infection.

Interpretation: Hospitals with long operating times should consider the potential benefit of reducing these times, as this may lead to lower revision rates and increased operating volumes. Shorter operation times could be achieved by standardization programs, but one should bear in mind that for cemented implants very short operating times also increased revision risk due to aseptic loosening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信