{"title":"性传播疾病检测:诊断检测和方法的评价。","authors":"Michael G Spigarelli, Frank M Biro","doi":"10.1016/j.admecli.2004.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most STIs in adolescents are asymptomatic. Recent studies in adolescents have documented relatively short periods of time until reinfection occurs (median times 4.7-7.6 months), suggesting that sexually active adolescents should be screened for STI every 6 months. Evidence-based practice is exceedingly helpful in deciding when to test, whom to test, and which methodology to use. In a recent critical analysis regarding screening women for chlamydia, screening all women for chlamydia was more cost-effective than testing only symptomatic women. With the proliferation of highly sensitive and specific assays, and the usefulness of different specimen sources (such as urine or self-swabs), health care providers of adolescents should screen all patients at risk for STIs. Although these screening and diagnostic techniques provide greater accuracy than previously attainable, screening should be part of a comprehensive methodology designed to promote good health care decisions, such as encouraging abstinence, promoting safer sexual practices, and using the most appropriate methodology to detect and treat STIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":87044,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent medicine clinics","volume":"15 2","pages":"287-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.admecli.2004.02.006","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexually transmitted disease testing: evaluation of diagnostic tests and methods.\",\"authors\":\"Michael G Spigarelli, Frank M Biro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.admecli.2004.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most STIs in adolescents are asymptomatic. Recent studies in adolescents have documented relatively short periods of time until reinfection occurs (median times 4.7-7.6 months), suggesting that sexually active adolescents should be screened for STI every 6 months. Evidence-based practice is exceedingly helpful in deciding when to test, whom to test, and which methodology to use. In a recent critical analysis regarding screening women for chlamydia, screening all women for chlamydia was more cost-effective than testing only symptomatic women. With the proliferation of highly sensitive and specific assays, and the usefulness of different specimen sources (such as urine or self-swabs), health care providers of adolescents should screen all patients at risk for STIs. Although these screening and diagnostic techniques provide greater accuracy than previously attainable, screening should be part of a comprehensive methodology designed to promote good health care decisions, such as encouraging abstinence, promoting safer sexual practices, and using the most appropriate methodology to detect and treat STIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adolescent medicine clinics\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"287-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.admecli.2004.02.006\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adolescent medicine clinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.admecli.2004.02.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent medicine clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.admecli.2004.02.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sexually transmitted disease testing: evaluation of diagnostic tests and methods.
Most STIs in adolescents are asymptomatic. Recent studies in adolescents have documented relatively short periods of time until reinfection occurs (median times 4.7-7.6 months), suggesting that sexually active adolescents should be screened for STI every 6 months. Evidence-based practice is exceedingly helpful in deciding when to test, whom to test, and which methodology to use. In a recent critical analysis regarding screening women for chlamydia, screening all women for chlamydia was more cost-effective than testing only symptomatic women. With the proliferation of highly sensitive and specific assays, and the usefulness of different specimen sources (such as urine or self-swabs), health care providers of adolescents should screen all patients at risk for STIs. Although these screening and diagnostic techniques provide greater accuracy than previously attainable, screening should be part of a comprehensive methodology designed to promote good health care decisions, such as encouraging abstinence, promoting safer sexual practices, and using the most appropriate methodology to detect and treat STIs.