无骨水泥全髋关节置换术中股骨腔制备的尺寸精度。

Li-dong Wu, H J Hahne, J Hassenpflug
{"title":"无骨水泥全髋关节置换术中股骨腔制备的尺寸精度。","authors":"Li-dong Wu,&nbsp;H J Hahne,&nbsp;J Hassenpflug","doi":"10.1631/jzus.2004.1270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To observe the accuracy of femoral preparation and the position of the cementless prosthesis in femoral cavity, and to compare the results between the computer-assisted surgical group (CASPAR) and the conventional group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten femoral components were implanted either manually or by CASPAR in cadaver femurs. The specimens were cut to 3 mm thick slices. Microradiograms of every slice were sent to a computer for analysis with special software (IDL). The gaps and the medullary cavities between component and bone, the direct bone contact area of the implant surface, the gap width and the percentage of gap and bone contact area were measured in every slice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the proximal implant coated with HA of the CASPAR group, the average percentage of bone contact reached 93.2% (ranging from 87.6% to 99.7%); the average gap percentage was 2.9% (ranging from 0.3% to 7.8%); the maximum gap width was 0.81 mm and the average gap width was only 0.20 mm. While in the conventional group, the average percentage of bone contact reached 60.1% (ranging from 49.2% to 70.4%); the average gap percentage was 32.8% (ranging from 25.1% to 39.9%); the maximum gap width was 2.97 mm and the average gap width was only 0.77 mm. The average gap around the implant in the CASPAR group was only 9% of that in the manual group; the maximum and average gap widths were only about 26% of those in the manual group. On the other hand, the CASPAR group showed 33% tighter bone contact than the manual group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the use of robotics-assisted system, significant progress can be achieved for femoral preparation in total hip arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":85042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science","volume":"5 10","pages":"1270-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1631/jzus.2004.1270","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Li-dong Wu,&nbsp;H J Hahne,&nbsp;J Hassenpflug\",\"doi\":\"10.1631/jzus.2004.1270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To observe the accuracy of femoral preparation and the position of the cementless prosthesis in femoral cavity, and to compare the results between the computer-assisted surgical group (CASPAR) and the conventional group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten femoral components were implanted either manually or by CASPAR in cadaver femurs. The specimens were cut to 3 mm thick slices. Microradiograms of every slice were sent to a computer for analysis with special software (IDL). The gaps and the medullary cavities between component and bone, the direct bone contact area of the implant surface, the gap width and the percentage of gap and bone contact area were measured in every slice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the proximal implant coated with HA of the CASPAR group, the average percentage of bone contact reached 93.2% (ranging from 87.6% to 99.7%); the average gap percentage was 2.9% (ranging from 0.3% to 7.8%); the maximum gap width was 0.81 mm and the average gap width was only 0.20 mm. While in the conventional group, the average percentage of bone contact reached 60.1% (ranging from 49.2% to 70.4%); the average gap percentage was 32.8% (ranging from 25.1% to 39.9%); the maximum gap width was 2.97 mm and the average gap width was only 0.77 mm. The average gap around the implant in the CASPAR group was only 9% of that in the manual group; the maximum and average gap widths were only about 26% of those in the manual group. On the other hand, the CASPAR group showed 33% tighter bone contact than the manual group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the use of robotics-assisted system, significant progress can be achieved for femoral preparation in total hip arthroplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science\",\"volume\":\"5 10\",\"pages\":\"1270-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1631/jzus.2004.1270\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2004.1270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2004.1270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

目的:观察股骨预备及无骨水泥假体在股腔内位置的准确性,并比较计算机辅助手术组(CASPAR)与常规手术组(CASPAR)的结果。方法:采用人工或CASPAR在尸体股骨内植入10个股骨假体。将标本切成3毫米厚的薄片。每个切片的微射线图被送入计算机,用专用软件(IDL)进行分析。每片测量假体与骨之间的间隙和髓腔、种植体表面的骨直接接触面积、间隙宽度以及间隙和骨接触面积的百分比。结果:CASPAR组近端HA涂层种植体骨接触率平均达到93.2%(范围为87.6% ~ 99.7%);平均差距百分比为2.9%(范围从0.3%到7.8%);最大间隙宽度为0.81 mm,平均间隙宽度仅为0.20 mm。常规组骨接触率平均为60.1% (49.2% ~ 70.4%);平均差距为32.8% (25.1% ~ 39.9%);最大间隙宽度为2.97 mm,平均间隙宽度仅为0.77 mm。CASPAR组种植体周围的平均间隙仅为手工组的9%;最大和平均间隙宽度仅为手工组的26%左右。另一方面,CASPAR组的骨接触比手动组紧密33%。结论:机器人辅助系统的应用可使全髋关节置换术中股骨准备工作取得显著进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Objective: To observe the accuracy of femoral preparation and the position of the cementless prosthesis in femoral cavity, and to compare the results between the computer-assisted surgical group (CASPAR) and the conventional group.

Methods: Ten femoral components were implanted either manually or by CASPAR in cadaver femurs. The specimens were cut to 3 mm thick slices. Microradiograms of every slice were sent to a computer for analysis with special software (IDL). The gaps and the medullary cavities between component and bone, the direct bone contact area of the implant surface, the gap width and the percentage of gap and bone contact area were measured in every slice.

Results: In the proximal implant coated with HA of the CASPAR group, the average percentage of bone contact reached 93.2% (ranging from 87.6% to 99.7%); the average gap percentage was 2.9% (ranging from 0.3% to 7.8%); the maximum gap width was 0.81 mm and the average gap width was only 0.20 mm. While in the conventional group, the average percentage of bone contact reached 60.1% (ranging from 49.2% to 70.4%); the average gap percentage was 32.8% (ranging from 25.1% to 39.9%); the maximum gap width was 2.97 mm and the average gap width was only 0.77 mm. The average gap around the implant in the CASPAR group was only 9% of that in the manual group; the maximum and average gap widths were only about 26% of those in the manual group. On the other hand, the CASPAR group showed 33% tighter bone contact than the manual group.

Conclusion: With the use of robotics-assisted system, significant progress can be achieved for femoral preparation in total hip arthroplasty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信