Geoffrey K Isbister, Steven J Bowe, Andrew Dawson, Ian M Whyte
{"title":"选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)过量时的相对毒性。","authors":"Geoffrey K Isbister, Steven J Bowe, Andrew Dawson, Ian M Whyte","doi":"10.1081/clt-120037428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have increasingly replaced tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the treatment of depression. They appear to be safer in overdose, but there is little information on their spectrum of toxicity in overdose, or relative toxicity of each agent. Objective: To determine the effect of SSRIs in overdose, as a group, and the relative toxicity of five different SSRIs. Methods: A review of consecutive SSRI poisoning admissions to a single toxicology unit. Outcomes examined were length of stay [LOS], intensive care [ICU] admission rate, coma, seizures, electrocardiographic [ECG] abnormalities, and presence of serotonin syndrome [SS]. Logistic regression was used to model the outcome QTc > 440 msec. Results: There were 469 SSRI poisoning admissions analyzed after exclusions. The median LOS for all SSRI overdose admissions was 15.3 h (IQR: 10.5–21.3) and 30 of 469 (6.4%; 95% CI 4.3–9.0%) cases were admitted to ICU. The incidence of seizures was 1.9% and coma was 2.4%. Serotonin syndrome occurred in 14% of overdoses. Comparison of median QTc intervals of the five SSRIs was significantly different (p = 0.0002); citalopram (450 IQR: 436–484) was individually different to fluoxetine (p = 0.045), fluvoxamine (p = 0.022), paroxetine (p = 0.0002), and sertraline (p = 0.001). The proportion of citalopram overdoses with a QTc > 440 msec was 68%, differing significantly from sertraline (adjusted OR: 5.11 95% CI 2.32–11.27). Comparison of median QT intervals of the five SSRIs was statistically different (p = 0.026); citalopram (400 IQR: 380–440) was individually different from sertraline (p = 0.023). Conclusions: This study shows SSRIs are relatively safe in overdose despite serotonin syndrome being common. The exception was citalopram, which was significantly associated with QTc prolongation. We believe that cardiac monitoring should be considered in citalopram overdose, particularly with large ingestions and patients with associated cardiac disease.","PeriodicalId":17447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology","volume":"42 3","pages":"277-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1081/clt-120037428","citationCount":"380","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative toxicity of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in overdose.\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey K Isbister, Steven J Bowe, Andrew Dawson, Ian M Whyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1081/clt-120037428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have increasingly replaced tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the treatment of depression. They appear to be safer in overdose, but there is little information on their spectrum of toxicity in overdose, or relative toxicity of each agent. Objective: To determine the effect of SSRIs in overdose, as a group, and the relative toxicity of five different SSRIs. Methods: A review of consecutive SSRI poisoning admissions to a single toxicology unit. Outcomes examined were length of stay [LOS], intensive care [ICU] admission rate, coma, seizures, electrocardiographic [ECG] abnormalities, and presence of serotonin syndrome [SS]. Logistic regression was used to model the outcome QTc > 440 msec. Results: There were 469 SSRI poisoning admissions analyzed after exclusions. The median LOS for all SSRI overdose admissions was 15.3 h (IQR: 10.5–21.3) and 30 of 469 (6.4%; 95% CI 4.3–9.0%) cases were admitted to ICU. The incidence of seizures was 1.9% and coma was 2.4%. Serotonin syndrome occurred in 14% of overdoses. Comparison of median QTc intervals of the five SSRIs was significantly different (p = 0.0002); citalopram (450 IQR: 436–484) was individually different to fluoxetine (p = 0.045), fluvoxamine (p = 0.022), paroxetine (p = 0.0002), and sertraline (p = 0.001). The proportion of citalopram overdoses with a QTc > 440 msec was 68%, differing significantly from sertraline (adjusted OR: 5.11 95% CI 2.32–11.27). Comparison of median QT intervals of the five SSRIs was statistically different (p = 0.026); citalopram (400 IQR: 380–440) was individually different from sertraline (p = 0.023). Conclusions: This study shows SSRIs are relatively safe in overdose despite serotonin syndrome being common. The exception was citalopram, which was significantly associated with QTc prolongation. We believe that cardiac monitoring should be considered in citalopram overdose, particularly with large ingestions and patients with associated cardiac disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"277-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1081/clt-120037428\",\"citationCount\":\"380\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1081/clt-120037428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/clt-120037428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 380
摘要
背景:选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)越来越多地取代三环抗抑郁药(TCAs)治疗抑郁症。它们在过量使用时似乎更安全,但关于它们在过量使用时的毒性谱或每种药物的相对毒性的信息很少。目的:探讨5种不同的SSRIs类药物在过量用药时的相对毒性。方法:回顾一个毒理学单位连续SSRI中毒入院。检查的结果包括住院时间(LOS)、重症监护(ICU)入院率、昏迷、癫痫发作、心电图(ECG)异常和血清素综合征(SS)的存在。采用Logistic回归对结果QTc >440 msec进行建模。结果:排除后共分析了469例SSRI类药物中毒入院。所有SSRI类药物过量入院的中位LOS为15.3小时(IQR: 10.5-21.3), 469人中有30人(6.4%;95% CI 4.3-9.0%)的病例被送入ICU。癫痫发作发生率为1.9%,昏迷发生率为2.4%。血清素综合征的发生率为14%。5种ssri类药物QTc间隔中位数比较差异有统计学意义(p=0.0002);西酞普兰(450 IQR: 436-484)分别与氟西汀(p=0.045)、氟伏沙明(p=0.022)、帕罗西汀(p=0.0002)和舍曲林(p=0.001)差异显著。西酞普兰QTc >440 msec的过量比例为68%,与舍曲林有显著差异(调整OR: 5.11 95% CI 2.32-11.27)。5种ssri类药物的QT间期中位数比较有统计学差异(p=0.026);西酞普兰(400 IQR: 380 ~ 440)与舍曲林差异有统计学意义(p=0.023)。结论:本研究表明,尽管血清素综合征很常见,但SSRIs在过量服用时是相对安全的。西酞普兰是例外,它与QTc延长显著相关。我们认为,西酞普兰过量时应考虑心脏监测,特别是大量摄入和相关心脏病患者。
Relative toxicity of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in overdose.
Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have increasingly replaced tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the treatment of depression. They appear to be safer in overdose, but there is little information on their spectrum of toxicity in overdose, or relative toxicity of each agent. Objective: To determine the effect of SSRIs in overdose, as a group, and the relative toxicity of five different SSRIs. Methods: A review of consecutive SSRI poisoning admissions to a single toxicology unit. Outcomes examined were length of stay [LOS], intensive care [ICU] admission rate, coma, seizures, electrocardiographic [ECG] abnormalities, and presence of serotonin syndrome [SS]. Logistic regression was used to model the outcome QTc > 440 msec. Results: There were 469 SSRI poisoning admissions analyzed after exclusions. The median LOS for all SSRI overdose admissions was 15.3 h (IQR: 10.5–21.3) and 30 of 469 (6.4%; 95% CI 4.3–9.0%) cases were admitted to ICU. The incidence of seizures was 1.9% and coma was 2.4%. Serotonin syndrome occurred in 14% of overdoses. Comparison of median QTc intervals of the five SSRIs was significantly different (p = 0.0002); citalopram (450 IQR: 436–484) was individually different to fluoxetine (p = 0.045), fluvoxamine (p = 0.022), paroxetine (p = 0.0002), and sertraline (p = 0.001). The proportion of citalopram overdoses with a QTc > 440 msec was 68%, differing significantly from sertraline (adjusted OR: 5.11 95% CI 2.32–11.27). Comparison of median QT intervals of the five SSRIs was statistically different (p = 0.026); citalopram (400 IQR: 380–440) was individually different from sertraline (p = 0.023). Conclusions: This study shows SSRIs are relatively safe in overdose despite serotonin syndrome being common. The exception was citalopram, which was significantly associated with QTc prolongation. We believe that cardiac monitoring should be considered in citalopram overdose, particularly with large ingestions and patients with associated cardiac disease.