{"title":"随机试验与观察性研究:比较观察性研究是一个糟糕的妥协还是一个完美的综合?","authors":"W Gaus","doi":"10.1159/000080568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Overview of some fundamental designs for clinical trials and studies. Some tentative definitions are given in order to stimulate questions and perspectives for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":80278,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","volume":"11 Suppl 1 ","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000080568","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised trials versus observational studies: is the comparative observational study a poor compromise or a perfect synthesis?\",\"authors\":\"W Gaus\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000080568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Overview of some fundamental designs for clinical trials and studies. Some tentative definitions are given in order to stimulate questions and perspectives for further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 Suppl 1 \",\"pages\":\"3-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000080568\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000080568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000080568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Randomised trials versus observational studies: is the comparative observational study a poor compromise or a perfect synthesis?
Overview of some fundamental designs for clinical trials and studies. Some tentative definitions are given in order to stimulate questions and perspectives for further research.