{"title":"评估一名公共教育工作者对向地区中毒中心报告的电话和中毒事件的影响。","authors":"Henry A Spiller, James B Mowry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are few studies that use measurable outcomes to gauge the effect of a public educator on the mission of the poison center. Human exposures, penetrance and total call volume from 2 regional poison centers for 7y (1996-2002) were evaluated. In poison center 1 a dedicated educator was employed for the final 4y of data (1999-2002). Poison center 2 data acted as a control with no dedicated educator for the 7-y period. The 2 centers were comparable in a number of ways: similar demographic rural and urban populations; similar geographic and economic region; and served the entire state. Human exposures in poison center 1 increased 4.3 % after employment of a dedicated educator, while exposure continued to decline at center 2 (1.7%). A steep decline in penetrance in poison center 1 was reversed after employment of a dedicated educator. Human exposures and penetrance for poison center 2 continued to decline during the study years. Total calls to center 1 increased 13.8% while total calls to center 2 remained flat (0.2%). This is the first study to use measurable outcomes to evaluate the impact of a public educator on the mission of a poison center. The addition of a public educator was associated with a positive impact on human exposures and penetrance reported to a regional poison center.</p>","PeriodicalId":23486,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and human toxicology","volume":"46 4","pages":"206-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effect of a public educator on calls and poisonings reported to a regional poison center.\",\"authors\":\"Henry A Spiller, James B Mowry\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are few studies that use measurable outcomes to gauge the effect of a public educator on the mission of the poison center. Human exposures, penetrance and total call volume from 2 regional poison centers for 7y (1996-2002) were evaluated. In poison center 1 a dedicated educator was employed for the final 4y of data (1999-2002). Poison center 2 data acted as a control with no dedicated educator for the 7-y period. The 2 centers were comparable in a number of ways: similar demographic rural and urban populations; similar geographic and economic region; and served the entire state. Human exposures in poison center 1 increased 4.3 % after employment of a dedicated educator, while exposure continued to decline at center 2 (1.7%). A steep decline in penetrance in poison center 1 was reversed after employment of a dedicated educator. Human exposures and penetrance for poison center 2 continued to decline during the study years. Total calls to center 1 increased 13.8% while total calls to center 2 remained flat (0.2%). This is the first study to use measurable outcomes to evaluate the impact of a public educator on the mission of a poison center. The addition of a public educator was associated with a positive impact on human exposures and penetrance reported to a regional poison center.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and human toxicology\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"206-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and human toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and human toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the effect of a public educator on calls and poisonings reported to a regional poison center.
There are few studies that use measurable outcomes to gauge the effect of a public educator on the mission of the poison center. Human exposures, penetrance and total call volume from 2 regional poison centers for 7y (1996-2002) were evaluated. In poison center 1 a dedicated educator was employed for the final 4y of data (1999-2002). Poison center 2 data acted as a control with no dedicated educator for the 7-y period. The 2 centers were comparable in a number of ways: similar demographic rural and urban populations; similar geographic and economic region; and served the entire state. Human exposures in poison center 1 increased 4.3 % after employment of a dedicated educator, while exposure continued to decline at center 2 (1.7%). A steep decline in penetrance in poison center 1 was reversed after employment of a dedicated educator. Human exposures and penetrance for poison center 2 continued to decline during the study years. Total calls to center 1 increased 13.8% while total calls to center 2 remained flat (0.2%). This is the first study to use measurable outcomes to evaluate the impact of a public educator on the mission of a poison center. The addition of a public educator was associated with a positive impact on human exposures and penetrance reported to a regional poison center.