[一项关于槲寄生治疗乳腺癌患者的研究证明了补充医学随机研究的问题]。

I Gerhard, U Abel, A Loewe-Mesch, S Huppmann, J J Kuehn
{"title":"[一项关于槲寄生治疗乳腺癌患者的研究证明了补充医学随机研究的问题]。","authors":"I Gerhard,&nbsp;U Abel,&nbsp;A Loewe-Mesch,&nbsp;S Huppmann,&nbsp;J J Kuehn","doi":"10.1159/000079444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prospective randomized studies on mistletoe therapy repeatedly demonstrated that there is a basic problem in the matter of enrolling the appropriate number of patients within a reasonable amount of time. Most studies have to face this problem. However, recent experience suggests that this problem is more pronounced in the case of mistletoe treatment of cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Possibility of recruitment and randomization of breast cancer patients for a mistletoe study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>During a period of 28 months every patient was registered who was admitted to the Gynecological Hospital of the University of Heidelberg because of suspected cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1,922 patients who were operated on for breast tumor, 521 first met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 154 out of these 521 patients agreed to take part in the study. After availability of the final results on tumor staging and the therapy plan for conventional treatment, 80 out of the 154 women had to be excluded from the study. From the remaining 74 patients (48%), however, only 29 (39%) would have agreed to take part in a randomized mistletoe study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This confirms our suspicion that the difficulties of enrollment and randomization in the case of mistletoe studies exceed those of studies conducted in conventional oncology. The reasons for this dramatic effect and the possibility of alternative study designs are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":80278,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"150-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000079444","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Problems of randomized studies in complementary medicine demonstrated in a study on mistletoe treatment of patients with breast cancer].\",\"authors\":\"I Gerhard,&nbsp;U Abel,&nbsp;A Loewe-Mesch,&nbsp;S Huppmann,&nbsp;J J Kuehn\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000079444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prospective randomized studies on mistletoe therapy repeatedly demonstrated that there is a basic problem in the matter of enrolling the appropriate number of patients within a reasonable amount of time. Most studies have to face this problem. However, recent experience suggests that this problem is more pronounced in the case of mistletoe treatment of cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Possibility of recruitment and randomization of breast cancer patients for a mistletoe study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>During a period of 28 months every patient was registered who was admitted to the Gynecological Hospital of the University of Heidelberg because of suspected cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1,922 patients who were operated on for breast tumor, 521 first met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 154 out of these 521 patients agreed to take part in the study. After availability of the final results on tumor staging and the therapy plan for conventional treatment, 80 out of the 154 women had to be excluded from the study. From the remaining 74 patients (48%), however, only 29 (39%) would have agreed to take part in a randomized mistletoe study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This confirms our suspicion that the difficulties of enrollment and randomization in the case of mistletoe studies exceed those of studies conducted in conventional oncology. The reasons for this dramatic effect and the possibility of alternative study designs are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"150-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000079444\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000079444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000079444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

背景:关于槲寄生治疗的前瞻性随机研究反复表明,在合理的时间内招募适当数量的患者存在一个基本问题。大多数研究都必须面对这个问题。然而,最近的经验表明,这个问题在槲寄生治疗癌症患者的情况下更为明显。目的:招募和随机化乳腺癌患者进行槲寄生研究的可能性。患者:在28个月的时间里,对海德堡大学妇科医院因怀疑患有癌症而入院的每位患者进行了登记。结果:1922例乳腺肿瘤手术患者中,521例首次符合纳入和排除标准。521名患者中有154人同意参加这项研究。在获得肿瘤分期和常规治疗方案的最终结果后,154名妇女中的80名必须被排除在研究之外。然而,在剩下的74名患者(48%)中,只有29名(39%)同意参加一项随机的槲寄生研究。结论:这证实了我们的怀疑,即槲寄生研究的入组和随机化的难度超过了传统肿瘤学研究。本文还讨论了产生这种显著效果的原因以及其他研究设计的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Problems of randomized studies in complementary medicine demonstrated in a study on mistletoe treatment of patients with breast cancer].

Background: Prospective randomized studies on mistletoe therapy repeatedly demonstrated that there is a basic problem in the matter of enrolling the appropriate number of patients within a reasonable amount of time. Most studies have to face this problem. However, recent experience suggests that this problem is more pronounced in the case of mistletoe treatment of cancer patients.

Objective: Possibility of recruitment and randomization of breast cancer patients for a mistletoe study.

Patients: During a period of 28 months every patient was registered who was admitted to the Gynecological Hospital of the University of Heidelberg because of suspected cancer.

Results: Out of 1,922 patients who were operated on for breast tumor, 521 first met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 154 out of these 521 patients agreed to take part in the study. After availability of the final results on tumor staging and the therapy plan for conventional treatment, 80 out of the 154 women had to be excluded from the study. From the remaining 74 patients (48%), however, only 29 (39%) would have agreed to take part in a randomized mistletoe study.

Conclusions: This confirms our suspicion that the difficulties of enrollment and randomization in the case of mistletoe studies exceed those of studies conducted in conventional oncology. The reasons for this dramatic effect and the possibility of alternative study designs are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信