限制同性伴侣的CPP遗属福利违宪。

Gord Cruess
{"title":"限制同性伴侣的CPP遗属福利违宪。","authors":"Gord Cruess","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On 19 December 2003, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice declared the federal government's Canada Pension Plan (CPP) survivor benefits regime as it applied to same-sex couples unconstitutional. Under the law, survivors in same-sex relationships could not receive benefits if their partner had died prior to 1 January 1998, while no similar restriction was imposed on opposite sex-relationship survivors. In Hislop v Canada, Justice Macdonald found this cut-off date to be unconstitutional because it denied gay and lesbian survivors equality of the law.</p>","PeriodicalId":83647,"journal":{"name":"Canadian HIV/AIDS policy & law review","volume":"9 1","pages":"52-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limits on CPP survivor benefits for same-sex couples unconstitutional.\",\"authors\":\"Gord Cruess\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>On 19 December 2003, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice declared the federal government's Canada Pension Plan (CPP) survivor benefits regime as it applied to same-sex couples unconstitutional. Under the law, survivors in same-sex relationships could not receive benefits if their partner had died prior to 1 January 1998, while no similar restriction was imposed on opposite sex-relationship survivors. In Hislop v Canada, Justice Macdonald found this cut-off date to be unconstitutional because it denied gay and lesbian survivors equality of the law.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian HIV/AIDS policy & law review\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"52-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian HIV/AIDS policy & law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian HIV/AIDS policy & law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2003年12月19日,安大略省高等法院宣布联邦政府适用于同性伴侣的加拿大养老金计划(CPP)遗属福利制度违宪。根据该法律,同性关系的幸存者如果其伴侣在1998年1月1日之前死亡,则不能领取福利,而对异性关系的幸存者则没有类似的限制。在希斯洛普诉加拿大案中,麦克唐纳法官认为这个截止日期是违宪的,因为它剥夺了同性恋幸存者在法律上的平等权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limits on CPP survivor benefits for same-sex couples unconstitutional.

On 19 December 2003, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice declared the federal government's Canada Pension Plan (CPP) survivor benefits regime as it applied to same-sex couples unconstitutional. Under the law, survivors in same-sex relationships could not receive benefits if their partner had died prior to 1 January 1998, while no similar restriction was imposed on opposite sex-relationship survivors. In Hislop v Canada, Justice Macdonald found this cut-off date to be unconstitutional because it denied gay and lesbian survivors equality of the law.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信