心血管护理的循证实践策略。

Linda Hatfield, Suzanne Mulvey, Avis Marleau-Webb, Laura Bower, Rosemary C Polomano
{"title":"心血管护理的循证实践策略。","authors":"Linda Hatfield,&nbsp;Suzanne Mulvey,&nbsp;Avis Marleau-Webb,&nbsp;Laura Bower,&nbsp;Rosemary C Polomano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a problem-solving approach utilizing the best available information to support clinical decisions. The cardiovascular literature sufficiently supports the adoption of EBP to reduce practice variations and improve patient outcomes. However, the ability to appraise evidence and determine the best ways to implement evidence into practice remains a challenge for most clinicians and administrators. Our discussion assesses the quality of evidence and the benefits of evidence-based approaches to care, but also frames the distinctions among research-based, evidence-based, and best practice. Organizational infrastructure is key to developing EBP approaches and sustaining high quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":79743,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular management : the official journal of the American College of Cardiovascular Administrators","volume":"15 3","pages":"10-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based practice strategies for cardiovascular care.\",\"authors\":\"Linda Hatfield,&nbsp;Suzanne Mulvey,&nbsp;Avis Marleau-Webb,&nbsp;Laura Bower,&nbsp;Rosemary C Polomano\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a problem-solving approach utilizing the best available information to support clinical decisions. The cardiovascular literature sufficiently supports the adoption of EBP to reduce practice variations and improve patient outcomes. However, the ability to appraise evidence and determine the best ways to implement evidence into practice remains a challenge for most clinicians and administrators. Our discussion assesses the quality of evidence and the benefits of evidence-based approaches to care, but also frames the distinctions among research-based, evidence-based, and best practice. Organizational infrastructure is key to developing EBP approaches and sustaining high quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular management : the official journal of the American College of Cardiovascular Administrators\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"10-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular management : the official journal of the American College of Cardiovascular Administrators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular management : the official journal of the American College of Cardiovascular Administrators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循证实践(EBP)是一种利用最佳可用信息来支持临床决策的解决问题的方法。心血管文献充分支持采用EBP来减少实践变化并改善患者预后。然而,对大多数临床医生和管理人员来说,评估证据和确定实施证据的最佳方法的能力仍然是一个挑战。我们的讨论评估了证据的质量和循证治疗方法的益处,但也构建了基于研究、循证和最佳实践之间的区别。组织基础设施是开发EBP方法和维持高质量护理的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence-based practice strategies for cardiovascular care.

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a problem-solving approach utilizing the best available information to support clinical decisions. The cardiovascular literature sufficiently supports the adoption of EBP to reduce practice variations and improve patient outcomes. However, the ability to appraise evidence and determine the best ways to implement evidence into practice remains a challenge for most clinicians and administrators. Our discussion assesses the quality of evidence and the benefits of evidence-based approaches to care, but also frames the distinctions among research-based, evidence-based, and best practice. Organizational infrastructure is key to developing EBP approaches and sustaining high quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信