研究伦理委员会在法国生物银行的构成和使用中的参与。

Grégoire Moutel, Sandrine De Montgolfier, Nathalie Duchange, Lama Sharara, Catherine Beaumont, Christian Hervé
{"title":"研究伦理委员会在法国生物银行的构成和使用中的参与。","authors":"Grégoire Moutel,&nbsp;Sandrine De Montgolfier,&nbsp;Nathalie Duchange,&nbsp;Lama Sharara,&nbsp;Catherine Beaumont,&nbsp;Christian Hervé","doi":"10.1097/00008571-200403000-00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concerns are emerging about the protection of individuals who take part in genetic research involving biobanks. We used several items of a questionnaire sent to 48 French research ethics committees (RECs) to investigate the means by which they evaluate the constitution and use of biobanks, and the elements on which conclusions were based. Most RECs felt they should evaluate the constitution of biobanks in protocols, but not all did so in practice. Harmonization of the competence of RECs for evaluating biobanks is required, particularly concerning information, consent, the duration of sample conservation and the communication of research results. Our results, together with those of others, demonstrate the need to develop rules and guidelines based on common ethical approaches, particularly in the European environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19917,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenetics","volume":"14 3","pages":"195-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00008571-200403000-00008","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of the involvement of research ethics committees in the constitution and use of biobanks in France.\",\"authors\":\"Grégoire Moutel,&nbsp;Sandrine De Montgolfier,&nbsp;Nathalie Duchange,&nbsp;Lama Sharara,&nbsp;Catherine Beaumont,&nbsp;Christian Hervé\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00008571-200403000-00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Concerns are emerging about the protection of individuals who take part in genetic research involving biobanks. We used several items of a questionnaire sent to 48 French research ethics committees (RECs) to investigate the means by which they evaluate the constitution and use of biobanks, and the elements on which conclusions were based. Most RECs felt they should evaluate the constitution of biobanks in protocols, but not all did so in practice. Harmonization of the competence of RECs for evaluating biobanks is required, particularly concerning information, consent, the duration of sample conservation and the communication of research results. Our results, together with those of others, demonstrate the need to develop rules and guidelines based on common ethical approaches, particularly in the European environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacogenetics\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"195-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00008571-200403000-00008\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacogenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008571-200403000-00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008571-200403000-00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

对参与涉及生物库的基因研究的个人的保护的担忧正在出现。我们使用了发给48个法国研究伦理委员会(rec)的问卷中的几个项目来调查他们评估生物银行的构成和使用的方法,以及得出结论所基于的要素。大多数rec认为他们应该在协议中评估生物库的构成,但并非所有rec都在实践中这样做。需要协调区域研究中心评价生物库的能力,特别是在信息、同意、样本保存期限和研究结果交流方面。我们的研究结果以及其他研究结果表明,需要制定基于共同伦理方法的规则和指导方针,特别是在欧洲环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of the involvement of research ethics committees in the constitution and use of biobanks in France.

Concerns are emerging about the protection of individuals who take part in genetic research involving biobanks. We used several items of a questionnaire sent to 48 French research ethics committees (RECs) to investigate the means by which they evaluate the constitution and use of biobanks, and the elements on which conclusions were based. Most RECs felt they should evaluate the constitution of biobanks in protocols, but not all did so in practice. Harmonization of the competence of RECs for evaluating biobanks is required, particularly concerning information, consent, the duration of sample conservation and the communication of research results. Our results, together with those of others, demonstrate the need to develop rules and guidelines based on common ethical approaches, particularly in the European environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信