专业人员在南非化学和生物战方案中的作用。

IF 3.2 2区哲学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Minerva Pub Date : 2002-01-01 DOI:10.1023/a:1015061614159

Chandré Gould, Peter Folb

{"title":"专业人员在南非化学和生物战方案中的作用。","authors":"Chandré Gould, Peter Folb","doi":"10.1023/a:1015061614159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a short account of the South African Defence Force's chemical and biological warfare programme during apartheid, specifically during the period 1980 to 1994. It examines the circumstances of recruitment of the scientists and physicians and their retention in the programme; details the 'scientific efforts' of the programme and its aberrations; and explores ethical issues in relation to the involvement of scientists in the programme.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":"40 1","pages":"77-91"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1015061614159","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of professionals in the South African chemical and biological warfare programme.\",\"authors\":\"Chandré Gould, Peter Folb\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1015061614159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a short account of the South African Defence Force's chemical and biological warfare programme during apartheid, specifically during the period 1980 to 1994. It examines the circumstances of recruitment of the scientists and physicians and their retention in the programme; details the 'scientific efforts' of the programme and its aberrations; and explores ethical issues in relation to the involvement of scientists in the programme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"77-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1015061614159\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015061614159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015061614159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

本文简要介绍了南非国防军在种族隔离期间，特别是在1980年至1994年期间的化学和生物战方案。它审查征聘科学家和医生的情况以及他们留在方案内的情况;详细说明该计划的“科学努力”及其偏差;并探讨了与科学家参与该计划有关的伦理问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The role of professionals in the South African chemical and biological warfare programme.

This paper provides a short account of the South African Defence Force's chemical and biological warfare programme during apartheid, specifically during the period 1980 to 1994. It examines the circumstances of recruitment of the scientists and physicians and their retention in the programme; details the 'scientific efforts' of the programme and its aberrations; and explores ethical issues in relation to the involvement of scientists in the programme.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Minerva Multiple-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Minerva is devoted to the study of ideas, traditions, cultures and institutions in science, higher education and research. It is concerned no less with history than with present practice, and with the local as well as the global. It speaks to the scholar, the teacher, the policy-maker and the administrator. It features articles, essay reviews and ''special'' issues on themes of topical importance. It represents no single school of thought, but welcomes diversity, within the rules of rational discourse. Its contributions are peer-reviewed. Its audience is world-wide.