对美国土著机构审查委员会关于科学主义和审查制度的警告。

Jurimetrics Pub Date : 2002-01-01

Andrew Askland

{"title":"对美国土著机构审查委员会关于科学主义和审查制度的警告。","authors":"Andrew Askland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Native American Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) promote the health and welfare of tribes by reviewing protocols for research studies that focus on their tribes. The benefits of approved protocols should not be overstated lest good studies disappoint because they do not satisfy unachievable expectations. IRBs also should avoid the temptation to censor the outcomes of those studies. Science relies on candor and clarity about results and methods to move forward.","PeriodicalId":81748,"journal":{"name":"Jurimetrics","volume":"42 2","pages":"159-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A caution to Native American institutional review boards about scientism and censorship.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Askland\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Native American Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) promote the health and welfare of tribes by reviewing protocols for research studies that focus on their tribes. The benefits of approved protocols should not be overstated lest good studies disappoint because they do not satisfy unachievable expectations. IRBs also should avoid the temptation to censor the outcomes of those studies. Science relies on candor and clarity about results and methods to move forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurimetrics\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"159-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurimetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurimetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

印第安人机构审查委员会(irb)通过审查以他们的部落为重点的研究协议来促进部落的健康和福利。批准方案的好处不应被夸大，以免好的研究因为无法满足无法实现的期望而令人失望。审查委员会也应该避免审查这些研究结果的诱惑。科学的发展依赖于结果和方法的坦率和清晰。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

A caution to Native American institutional review boards about scientism and censorship.

Native American Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) promote the health and welfare of tribes by reviewing protocols for research studies that focus on their tribes. The benefits of approved protocols should not be overstated lest good studies disappoint because they do not satisfy unachievable expectations. IRBs also should avoid the temptation to censor the outcomes of those studies. Science relies on candor and clarity about results and methods to move forward.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Jurimetrics

自引率

0.00%

发文量