建立欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)rDNA乙型肝炎疫苗(方法A和B)第2批生物参比制剂(BRP)

Pharmeuropa bio Pub Date : 2004-01-01
R Dobbelaer, A Daas, C Milne
{"title":"建立欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)rDNA乙型肝炎疫苗(方法A和B)第2批生物参比制剂(BRP)","authors":"R Dobbelaer,&nbsp;A Daas,&nbsp;C Milne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A collaborative study was initiated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM), to assign a potency value for candidate batch 2 of European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for Hepatitis B (rDNA) antigen in vitro assays, for both method A and method B by calibrating them against the Ph. Eur. BRPs, batch 1 for methods A and B respectively. The study was prompted by the observation that the first batch of BRP for method B appeared to have lost potency over time. BRP 1 for method A showed no loss in potency, however stocks of the material were nearing depletion. Eleven laboratories participated in the study and all reported results. Participants performed 3 independent assays using both method A and method B. Method A was used to assess BRPs for method A and method B was used to assess BRPs for method B. Since BRP 1B was suspected to have lost potency, an additional sample was included in the method B test in an attempt to clarify the situation. BRP 1B was also assayed in method A against BRP 1A in the hope of also attaining further information by comparing the results from this study to those obtained in the original study to establish the first batch of BRP [1]. Although it was not the primary aim of this study to correlate in vitro potency with the immunogenicity assay in mice, a number of interested parties also performed the mouse in vivo assay to obtain data on the behaviour of the candidate BRPs in this assay. For method A, potency estimates were satisfactory in terms of repeatability and reproducibility. The candidate material was therefore assigned a value of 16.6 micrograms/ml. For method B, it appeared that the observation of reduced in vitro potency of BRP1 was confirmed. Despite the attempt to clarify the situation with additional studies, it was not possible to assign a potency value with the results obtained. A small-scale collaborative study will be organised to determine an appropriate value for the candidate BRP for method B. The results from the in vivo study while highly variable showed no evidence of a shift in the in vivo potency for either BRP 1A or BRP 1B. It should be noted that the in vitro method for determination of hepatitis B vaccine potency is under revision due to the discontinuation of the Auszyme kit from Abbott, which is required to perform the current assays. Once an alternative assay has been established, the suitability of the reference preparations or establishment of new reference preparations will be required. The candidate material for method A BRP was adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission at its session in November 2003, as the European Pharmacopoeia Hepatitis B vaccine (rDNA) method A, batch 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":86996,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio","volume":"2003 2","pages":"77-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment of European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparations (BRP) batch 2 for rDNA hepatitis B vaccine (method A and B).\",\"authors\":\"R Dobbelaer,&nbsp;A Daas,&nbsp;C Milne\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A collaborative study was initiated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM), to assign a potency value for candidate batch 2 of European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for Hepatitis B (rDNA) antigen in vitro assays, for both method A and method B by calibrating them against the Ph. Eur. BRPs, batch 1 for methods A and B respectively. The study was prompted by the observation that the first batch of BRP for method B appeared to have lost potency over time. BRP 1 for method A showed no loss in potency, however stocks of the material were nearing depletion. Eleven laboratories participated in the study and all reported results. Participants performed 3 independent assays using both method A and method B. Method A was used to assess BRPs for method A and method B was used to assess BRPs for method B. Since BRP 1B was suspected to have lost potency, an additional sample was included in the method B test in an attempt to clarify the situation. BRP 1B was also assayed in method A against BRP 1A in the hope of also attaining further information by comparing the results from this study to those obtained in the original study to establish the first batch of BRP [1]. Although it was not the primary aim of this study to correlate in vitro potency with the immunogenicity assay in mice, a number of interested parties also performed the mouse in vivo assay to obtain data on the behaviour of the candidate BRPs in this assay. For method A, potency estimates were satisfactory in terms of repeatability and reproducibility. The candidate material was therefore assigned a value of 16.6 micrograms/ml. For method B, it appeared that the observation of reduced in vitro potency of BRP1 was confirmed. Despite the attempt to clarify the situation with additional studies, it was not possible to assign a potency value with the results obtained. A small-scale collaborative study will be organised to determine an appropriate value for the candidate BRP for method B. The results from the in vivo study while highly variable showed no evidence of a shift in the in vivo potency for either BRP 1A or BRP 1B. It should be noted that the in vitro method for determination of hepatitis B vaccine potency is under revision due to the discontinuation of the Auszyme kit from Abbott, which is required to perform the current assays. Once an alternative assay has been established, the suitability of the reference preparations or establishment of new reference preparations will be required. The candidate material for method A BRP was adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission at its session in November 2003, as the European Pharmacopoeia Hepatitis B vaccine (rDNA) method A, batch 2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":86996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmeuropa bio\",\"volume\":\"2003 2\",\"pages\":\"77-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmeuropa bio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲药品质量理事会(EDQM)发起了一项合作研究,为欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)候选批2指定效价值。B型肝炎(rDNA)抗原的生物参比制剂(BRP)的体外检测,方法A和方法B通过对照Ph. Eur进行校准。方法A和方法B分别为第1批brp。这项研究是由于观察到B方法的第一批BRP随着时间的推移似乎失去了效力。方法A的brp1没有显示出效力的损失,但是材料的库存接近枯竭。11个实验室参与了这项研究,并都报告了结果。参与者分别使用方法A和方法B进行了3次独立分析。方法A用于评估方法A的BRPs,方法B用于评估方法B的BRPs。由于怀疑BRP 1B已失去效力,因此在方法B测试中增加了一个样本,以试图澄清情况。在方法A中,我们还对BRP 1B和BRP 1A进行了检测,希望通过将本研究的结果与原始研究的结果进行比较来获得进一步的信息,以建立第一批BRP[1]。尽管将体外效力与小鼠免疫原性试验相关联并不是本研究的主要目的,但一些感兴趣的研究人员也进行了小鼠体内试验,以获得候选BRPs在该试验中的行为数据。方法A的效价估计在重复性和再现性方面是令人满意的。因此,该候选物质的测定值为16.6微克/毫升。方法B似乎证实了BRP1体外效力降低的观察结果。尽管试图通过进一步的研究来澄清情况,但无法根据所获得的结果确定效力值。将组织一项小规模的合作研究,以确定方法b的候选BRP的适当值。体内研究的结果虽然高度可变,但没有证据表明BRP 1A或BRP 1B的体内效力发生变化。值得注意的是,由于目前的检测需要雅培公司的Auszyme试剂盒,因此乙肝疫苗效力的体外测定方法正在进行修订。一旦确定了替代分析方法,就需要确定参比制剂的适用性或建立新的参比制剂。欧洲药典委员会在2003年11月的会议上通过了方法A BRP的候选材料,作为欧洲药典乙型肝炎疫苗(rDNA)方法A,第2批。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment of European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparations (BRP) batch 2 for rDNA hepatitis B vaccine (method A and B).

A collaborative study was initiated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM), to assign a potency value for candidate batch 2 of European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for Hepatitis B (rDNA) antigen in vitro assays, for both method A and method B by calibrating them against the Ph. Eur. BRPs, batch 1 for methods A and B respectively. The study was prompted by the observation that the first batch of BRP for method B appeared to have lost potency over time. BRP 1 for method A showed no loss in potency, however stocks of the material were nearing depletion. Eleven laboratories participated in the study and all reported results. Participants performed 3 independent assays using both method A and method B. Method A was used to assess BRPs for method A and method B was used to assess BRPs for method B. Since BRP 1B was suspected to have lost potency, an additional sample was included in the method B test in an attempt to clarify the situation. BRP 1B was also assayed in method A against BRP 1A in the hope of also attaining further information by comparing the results from this study to those obtained in the original study to establish the first batch of BRP [1]. Although it was not the primary aim of this study to correlate in vitro potency with the immunogenicity assay in mice, a number of interested parties also performed the mouse in vivo assay to obtain data on the behaviour of the candidate BRPs in this assay. For method A, potency estimates were satisfactory in terms of repeatability and reproducibility. The candidate material was therefore assigned a value of 16.6 micrograms/ml. For method B, it appeared that the observation of reduced in vitro potency of BRP1 was confirmed. Despite the attempt to clarify the situation with additional studies, it was not possible to assign a potency value with the results obtained. A small-scale collaborative study will be organised to determine an appropriate value for the candidate BRP for method B. The results from the in vivo study while highly variable showed no evidence of a shift in the in vivo potency for either BRP 1A or BRP 1B. It should be noted that the in vitro method for determination of hepatitis B vaccine potency is under revision due to the discontinuation of the Auszyme kit from Abbott, which is required to perform the current assays. Once an alternative assay has been established, the suitability of the reference preparations or establishment of new reference preparations will be required. The candidate material for method A BRP was adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission at its session in November 2003, as the European Pharmacopoeia Hepatitis B vaccine (rDNA) method A, batch 2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信