双胎妊娠死产风险与性别和产妇年龄的关系对90386名双胞胎产妇的分析。

C R LOWE, R G RECORD
{"title":"双胎妊娠死产风险与性别和产妇年龄的关系对90386名双胞胎产妇的分析。","authors":"C R LOWE, R G RECORD","doi":"10.1136/jech.5.1.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that in every country with reliable vital statistics more male than female children are born each year, and that the sex ratio of stillbirths is considerably higher than that of related live births. By means of data from the Annual Reports of the Registrar-General for England and Wales and for Scotland it has recently been demonstrated (Lowe and McKeown, 1950) that the sex ratio of total births decreases with maternal age, whereas the sex ratio of stillbirths increases. It was suggested that this relationship to age is due to changes in the relative proportions in each maternal age group of different causes of stillbirth, each of which has its own sex ratio. Since July, 1938, the Annual Reports of the Registrar-General for England and Wales have presented the results of twin maternities by sex, type of birth (live or stillborn), and maternal age, although cause of stillbirth is unfortunately not recorded. Between July, 1938, and December, 1948, 90,730 twin maternities were notified, for 344 of which maternal age was not specified. We are unaware of any reference in the literature to the sex of twin stillbirths in relation to the age of the mother, and this communication presents an analysis of 90,386 twin maternities for which the necessary data are available.","PeriodicalId":84321,"journal":{"name":"British journal of social medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1951-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jech.5.1.34","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of stillbirth in twin pregnancy related to sex and maternal age; an analysis of 90,386 twin maternities.\",\"authors\":\"C R LOWE, R G RECORD\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jech.5.1.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that in every country with reliable vital statistics more male than female children are born each year, and that the sex ratio of stillbirths is considerably higher than that of related live births. By means of data from the Annual Reports of the Registrar-General for England and Wales and for Scotland it has recently been demonstrated (Lowe and McKeown, 1950) that the sex ratio of total births decreases with maternal age, whereas the sex ratio of stillbirths increases. It was suggested that this relationship to age is due to changes in the relative proportions in each maternal age group of different causes of stillbirth, each of which has its own sex ratio. Since July, 1938, the Annual Reports of the Registrar-General for England and Wales have presented the results of twin maternities by sex, type of birth (live or stillborn), and maternal age, although cause of stillbirth is unfortunately not recorded. Between July, 1938, and December, 1948, 90,730 twin maternities were notified, for 344 of which maternal age was not specified. We are unaware of any reference in the literature to the sex of twin stillbirths in relation to the age of the mother, and this communication presents an analysis of 90,386 twin maternities for which the necessary data are available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of social medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"34-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1951-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jech.5.1.34\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of social medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.5.1.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.5.1.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of stillbirth in twin pregnancy related to sex and maternal age; an analysis of 90,386 twin maternities.
It is well known that in every country with reliable vital statistics more male than female children are born each year, and that the sex ratio of stillbirths is considerably higher than that of related live births. By means of data from the Annual Reports of the Registrar-General for England and Wales and for Scotland it has recently been demonstrated (Lowe and McKeown, 1950) that the sex ratio of total births decreases with maternal age, whereas the sex ratio of stillbirths increases. It was suggested that this relationship to age is due to changes in the relative proportions in each maternal age group of different causes of stillbirth, each of which has its own sex ratio. Since July, 1938, the Annual Reports of the Registrar-General for England and Wales have presented the results of twin maternities by sex, type of birth (live or stillborn), and maternal age, although cause of stillbirth is unfortunately not recorded. Between July, 1938, and December, 1948, 90,730 twin maternities were notified, for 344 of which maternal age was not specified. We are unaware of any reference in the literature to the sex of twin stillbirths in relation to the age of the mother, and this communication presents an analysis of 90,386 twin maternities for which the necessary data are available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信