二氧化硫空气污染事件对健康的影响。

Terry P Brown, Lesley Rushton, Moira A Mugglestone, David F Meechan
{"title":"二氧化硫空气污染事件对健康的影响。","authors":"Terry P Brown,&nbsp;Lesley Rushton,&nbsp;Moira A Mugglestone,&nbsp;David F Meechan","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A sulphur dioxide (SO(2)) episode occurred in the United Kingdom in 1998. The worst affected area was the city of Nottingham.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Emergency hospital admissions in Nottingham in the episode week were compared with those in the previous week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant increase in admissions for all respiratory diseases occurred in the episode week (odds ratio (OR) = 1.40, 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-1.94). Ten of the 25 excess admissions were for asthma, although the excess for asthma alone was not statistically significant (OR = 1.90, 95 per cent CI = 0.87-4.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The excess admissions for respiratory diseases could have been caused by exposure to SO(2), to other pollutants present in increased concentrations during the pollution episode, or by seasonal variations in the frequency of asthma symptoms, or prevailing weather conditions. This study shows how simple analyses of routinely collected health data can be used to assess public health impacts of pollution episodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg083","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health effects of a sulphur dioxide air pollution episode.\",\"authors\":\"Terry P Brown,&nbsp;Lesley Rushton,&nbsp;Moira A Mugglestone,&nbsp;David F Meechan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pubmed/fdg083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A sulphur dioxide (SO(2)) episode occurred in the United Kingdom in 1998. The worst affected area was the city of Nottingham.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Emergency hospital admissions in Nottingham in the episode week were compared with those in the previous week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant increase in admissions for all respiratory diseases occurred in the episode week (odds ratio (OR) = 1.40, 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-1.94). Ten of the 25 excess admissions were for asthma, although the excess for asthma alone was not statistically significant (OR = 1.90, 95 per cent CI = 0.87-4.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The excess admissions for respiratory diseases could have been caused by exposure to SO(2), to other pollutants present in increased concentrations during the pollution episode, or by seasonal variations in the frequency of asthma symptoms, or prevailing weather conditions. This study shows how simple analyses of routinely collected health data can be used to assess public health impacts of pollution episodes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg083\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

背景:1998年在英国发生了一次二氧化硫(SO(2))事件。受影响最严重的地区是诺丁汉市。方法:对发作周与前一周的急诊住院人数进行比较。结果:发作周发生的所有呼吸系统疾病入院率均有统计学意义上的显著增加(优势比(OR) = 1.40, 95%可信区间(CI) = 1.00-1.94)。25例额外入院中有10例是哮喘,尽管哮喘单独的额外入院没有统计学意义(OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 0.87-4.15)。结论:呼吸道疾病的过量入院可能是由于暴露于SO(2),污染发作期间浓度增加的其他污染物,或哮喘症状频率的季节性变化或当时的天气条件造成的。这项研究表明,对常规收集的健康数据进行简单分析可以用来评估污染事件对公众健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health effects of a sulphur dioxide air pollution episode.

Background: A sulphur dioxide (SO(2)) episode occurred in the United Kingdom in 1998. The worst affected area was the city of Nottingham.

Methods: Emergency hospital admissions in Nottingham in the episode week were compared with those in the previous week.

Results: A statistically significant increase in admissions for all respiratory diseases occurred in the episode week (odds ratio (OR) = 1.40, 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-1.94). Ten of the 25 excess admissions were for asthma, although the excess for asthma alone was not statistically significant (OR = 1.90, 95 per cent CI = 0.87-4.15).

Conclusions: The excess admissions for respiratory diseases could have been caused by exposure to SO(2), to other pollutants present in increased concentrations during the pollution episode, or by seasonal variations in the frequency of asthma symptoms, or prevailing weather conditions. This study shows how simple analyses of routinely collected health data can be used to assess public health impacts of pollution episodes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信