硫柳汞在加拿大中心的斑贴试验:11年的经验。

Anatoli Freiman, Ahmed Al-Layali, Denis Sasseville
{"title":"硫柳汞在加拿大中心的斑贴试验:11年的经验。","authors":"Anatoli Freiman,&nbsp;Ahmed Al-Layali,&nbsp;Denis Sasseville","doi":"10.2310/6620.2003.6152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thimerosal has been used for decades as an antiseptic, a disinfectant, and a preservative in various consumer products. It is also a notoriously frequent contact allergen, but the significance of positive patch-test reactions has been debated over the past decade.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and relevance of positive patch-test reactions to thimerosal in a large Canadian center and to compare our results with those of previous publications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data collected over the course of 11 years in the contact dermatitis clinic of a university hospital was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2252 subjects patch-tested for thimerosal, positive reactions were observed in 102 individuals (4.53%), placing thimerosal as the fifth most common allergen in our practice. The sensitization rate was equivalent between the patients who underwent aimed patch testing and those who were routinely tested for reaction to thimerosal when this allergen was included in our standard patch-testing series 8 years into the study. There was an increased incidence of thimerosal sensitization in chemists and laboratory technicians, as well as in health care workers, including medical doctors, registered nurses, dentists, and dental assistants. While eight reactions were deemed possibly relevant, in none of the cases was it possible to definitely establish the relevance of positive reactions to thimerosal, either because the presence of this allergen could not be verified in patients' products or because patch testing with these products gave negative results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In agreement with previous reports, we conclude that even though positive reactions to thimerosal are frequent, very few seem to be clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patch testing with thimerosal in a Canadian center: an 11-year experience.\",\"authors\":\"Anatoli Freiman,&nbsp;Ahmed Al-Layali,&nbsp;Denis Sasseville\",\"doi\":\"10.2310/6620.2003.6152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thimerosal has been used for decades as an antiseptic, a disinfectant, and a preservative in various consumer products. It is also a notoriously frequent contact allergen, but the significance of positive patch-test reactions has been debated over the past decade.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and relevance of positive patch-test reactions to thimerosal in a large Canadian center and to compare our results with those of previous publications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data collected over the course of 11 years in the contact dermatitis clinic of a university hospital was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2252 subjects patch-tested for thimerosal, positive reactions were observed in 102 individuals (4.53%), placing thimerosal as the fifth most common allergen in our practice. The sensitization rate was equivalent between the patients who underwent aimed patch testing and those who were routinely tested for reaction to thimerosal when this allergen was included in our standard patch-testing series 8 years into the study. There was an increased incidence of thimerosal sensitization in chemists and laboratory technicians, as well as in health care workers, including medical doctors, registered nurses, dentists, and dental assistants. While eight reactions were deemed possibly relevant, in none of the cases was it possible to definitely establish the relevance of positive reactions to thimerosal, either because the presence of this allergen could not be verified in patients' products or because patch testing with these products gave negative results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In agreement with previous reports, we conclude that even though positive reactions to thimerosal are frequent, very few seem to be clinically relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2003.6152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2003.6152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景:几十年来,硫柳汞一直被用作各种消费品中的防腐剂、消毒剂和防腐剂。它也是一种非常常见的接触性过敏原,但在过去的十年里,人们一直在争论贴片测试阳性反应的重要性。目的:本研究的目的是评估在加拿大一个大型中心对硫柳汞进行膜片试验阳性反应的普遍性和相关性,并将我们的结果与以前发表的结果进行比较。方法:回顾性分析一所大学医院接触性皮炎门诊11年来收集的资料。结果:在2252名受试者中,有102人(4.53%)出现了硫柳汞的阳性反应,硫柳汞成为我们实践中第五大最常见的过敏原。当该过敏原被纳入我们8年的标准斑贴试验系列时,接受定向斑贴试验的患者和常规测试硫柳汞反应的患者的致敏率是相同的。化学家和实验室技术人员以及卫生保健工作者(包括医生、注册护士、牙医和牙医助理)中硫柳汞致敏的发生率有所增加。虽然有8种反应被认为可能相关,但在所有病例中都不可能明确确定硫柳汞阳性反应的相关性,要么是因为无法在患者的产品中证实这种过敏原的存在,要么是因为对这些产品进行的斑贴试验得出了阴性结果。结论:与以前的报告一致,我们得出结论,尽管硫柳汞的阳性反应很常见,但很少有临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patch testing with thimerosal in a Canadian center: an 11-year experience.

Background: Thimerosal has been used for decades as an antiseptic, a disinfectant, and a preservative in various consumer products. It is also a notoriously frequent contact allergen, but the significance of positive patch-test reactions has been debated over the past decade.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and relevance of positive patch-test reactions to thimerosal in a large Canadian center and to compare our results with those of previous publications.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected over the course of 11 years in the contact dermatitis clinic of a university hospital was performed.

Results: Of 2252 subjects patch-tested for thimerosal, positive reactions were observed in 102 individuals (4.53%), placing thimerosal as the fifth most common allergen in our practice. The sensitization rate was equivalent between the patients who underwent aimed patch testing and those who were routinely tested for reaction to thimerosal when this allergen was included in our standard patch-testing series 8 years into the study. There was an increased incidence of thimerosal sensitization in chemists and laboratory technicians, as well as in health care workers, including medical doctors, registered nurses, dentists, and dental assistants. While eight reactions were deemed possibly relevant, in none of the cases was it possible to definitely establish the relevance of positive reactions to thimerosal, either because the presence of this allergen could not be verified in patients' products or because patch testing with these products gave negative results.

Conclusion: In agreement with previous reports, we conclude that even though positive reactions to thimerosal are frequent, very few seem to be clinically relevant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信