彗星试验和流式细胞术分析了不同作用机制的已知诱变剂对正常细胞和癌细胞的DNA修复作用。

M Suggitt, J Fearnley, D J Swaine, M Volpato, R M Phillips, M C Bibby, P M Loadman, D Anderson
{"title":"彗星试验和流式细胞术分析了不同作用机制的已知诱变剂对正常细胞和癌细胞的DNA修复作用。","authors":"M Suggitt,&nbsp;J Fearnley,&nbsp;D J Swaine,&nbsp;M Volpato,&nbsp;R M Phillips,&nbsp;M C Bibby,&nbsp;P M Loadman,&nbsp;D Anderson","doi":"10.1002/tcm.10077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to determine differences in repair after treatment with DNA damaging agents, normal and cancer cells were selected for analysis of single strand breaks and DNA crosslinks using the Comet assay. Normal human lymphocytes, human colorectal adenocarcinoma SW620 cells, lung carcinoma A549, and H460 cell lines were exposed to an ethylating agent (ethylmethane sulfonate [EMS]), and a cross-linking agent (mitomycin C [MMC]). Differences in repair profiles of DNA damage demonstrated using the comet assay were observed in human lymphocytes and tumour cell lines with both mutagens. Results were also indicative that MMC repair is concentration-dependent. It was also apparent that normal cells repair DNA damage more readily than tumour cells. Repair also varied between different cell lines. To investigate the mechanistic differences of these two chemicals, flow cytometry studies were undertaken in tumour cells, namely cell cycle analysis and frequency of micronuclei induction (FMN). A G2M phase block was clearly evident following treatment with EMS at all concentrations tested. With MMC, an initial arrest of cells in G2M was accompanied by a build-up in S-phase over longer exposure periods. Also, at the highest mutagen doses there were different patterns of micronuclei induction. Thus, using the mutagens with different mechanisms of action highlighted the differences in repair patterns between normal and tumour cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":22336,"journal":{"name":"Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis","volume":"Suppl 2 ","pages":"13-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tcm.10077","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comet assay and flow cytometry analysis of DNA repair in normal and cancer cells treated with known mutagens with different mechanisms of action.\",\"authors\":\"M Suggitt,&nbsp;J Fearnley,&nbsp;D J Swaine,&nbsp;M Volpato,&nbsp;R M Phillips,&nbsp;M C Bibby,&nbsp;P M Loadman,&nbsp;D Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tcm.10077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to determine differences in repair after treatment with DNA damaging agents, normal and cancer cells were selected for analysis of single strand breaks and DNA crosslinks using the Comet assay. Normal human lymphocytes, human colorectal adenocarcinoma SW620 cells, lung carcinoma A549, and H460 cell lines were exposed to an ethylating agent (ethylmethane sulfonate [EMS]), and a cross-linking agent (mitomycin C [MMC]). Differences in repair profiles of DNA damage demonstrated using the comet assay were observed in human lymphocytes and tumour cell lines with both mutagens. Results were also indicative that MMC repair is concentration-dependent. It was also apparent that normal cells repair DNA damage more readily than tumour cells. Repair also varied between different cell lines. To investigate the mechanistic differences of these two chemicals, flow cytometry studies were undertaken in tumour cells, namely cell cycle analysis and frequency of micronuclei induction (FMN). A G2M phase block was clearly evident following treatment with EMS at all concentrations tested. With MMC, an initial arrest of cells in G2M was accompanied by a build-up in S-phase over longer exposure periods. Also, at the highest mutagen doses there were different patterns of micronuclei induction. Thus, using the mutagens with different mechanisms of action highlighted the differences in repair patterns between normal and tumour cells.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\"Suppl 2 \",\"pages\":\"13-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tcm.10077\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tcm.10077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tcm.10077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

为了确定DNA损伤剂处理后修复的差异,选择正常细胞和癌细胞进行单链断裂和DNA交联分析,使用Comet试验。将正常人淋巴细胞、人结直肠癌SW620细胞、肺癌A549和H460细胞系暴露于乙基化剂(乙基甲烷磺酸盐[EMS])和交联剂(丝裂霉素C [MMC])中。在人类淋巴细胞和肿瘤细胞系中观察到两种诱变剂在DNA损伤修复谱上的差异。结果还表明,MMC修复是浓度依赖性的。同样明显的是,正常细胞比肿瘤细胞更容易修复DNA损伤。修复能力在不同细胞系之间也存在差异。为了研究这两种化学物质的机制差异,在肿瘤细胞中进行了流式细胞术研究,即细胞周期分析和微核诱导频率(FMN)。在所有测试浓度的EMS处理后,G2M相阻滞明显。在MMC中,G2M细胞的初始阻滞伴随着s期的积累,暴露时间越长。此外,在最高的诱变剂剂量下,有不同的微核诱导模式。因此,使用具有不同作用机制的诱变剂突出了正常细胞和肿瘤细胞之间修复模式的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comet assay and flow cytometry analysis of DNA repair in normal and cancer cells treated with known mutagens with different mechanisms of action.

In order to determine differences in repair after treatment with DNA damaging agents, normal and cancer cells were selected for analysis of single strand breaks and DNA crosslinks using the Comet assay. Normal human lymphocytes, human colorectal adenocarcinoma SW620 cells, lung carcinoma A549, and H460 cell lines were exposed to an ethylating agent (ethylmethane sulfonate [EMS]), and a cross-linking agent (mitomycin C [MMC]). Differences in repair profiles of DNA damage demonstrated using the comet assay were observed in human lymphocytes and tumour cell lines with both mutagens. Results were also indicative that MMC repair is concentration-dependent. It was also apparent that normal cells repair DNA damage more readily than tumour cells. Repair also varied between different cell lines. To investigate the mechanistic differences of these two chemicals, flow cytometry studies were undertaken in tumour cells, namely cell cycle analysis and frequency of micronuclei induction (FMN). A G2M phase block was clearly evident following treatment with EMS at all concentrations tested. With MMC, an initial arrest of cells in G2M was accompanied by a build-up in S-phase over longer exposure periods. Also, at the highest mutagen doses there were different patterns of micronuclei induction. Thus, using the mutagens with different mechanisms of action highlighted the differences in repair patterns between normal and tumour cells.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信