810 nm低强度激光治疗(LLLT)对细菌体外生长的影响:辐照度和辐射暴露的相关性

Ethne L Nussbaum, Lothar Lilge, Tony Mazzulli
{"title":"810 nm低强度激光治疗(LLLT)对细菌体外生长的影响:辐照度和辐射暴露的相关性","authors":"Ethne L Nussbaum,&nbsp;Lothar Lilge,&nbsp;Tony Mazzulli","doi":"10.1089/104454703322564497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the irradiance-dependency of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) effects on bacterial growth.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>LLLT is applied to open wounds to improve healing; however, its effect on wound bacteria is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were irradiated using a wavelength of 810 nm at irradiances of 0.015 W/cm2 (0-50 J/cm2) and 0.03 W/cm2 (0-80 J/cm2). Bacteria were counted after 20 h of incubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LLLT effects varied significantly with species. P.aeruginosa growth decreased overall dependent on an interaction of irradiance and radiant exposure; greatest inhibition was produced using high irradiance delivering radiant exposures in the range of 1-20 J/cm2 (p = 0.001-0.04). In contrast, E. coli growth increased overall (p = 0.01), regardless of irradiance; greatest effects were produced using low radiant exposures (1-20 J/cm2). There was a main effect for irradiance (p = 0.03) on S. aureus growth; however, growth was not different compared with controls. Additional analysis showed that there were differences in growth of P.aeruginosa when comparing samples that were matched by exposure times (66, 329, 658, 1316, 1974, and 2632 sec) rather than radiant exposure; this suggests that irradiance rather than exposure time was the significant factor in P. aeruginosa inhibition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings have immediate relevancy in the use of LLLT for infected wounds. Exposure to 810-nm irradiation (0.03 W/cm2) could potentially benefit wounds infected with P. aeruginosa. However, increased E. coli growth could further delay recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":79503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/104454703322564497","citationCount":"81","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) of 810 nm upon in vitro growth of bacteria: relevance of irradiance and radiant exposure.\",\"authors\":\"Ethne L Nussbaum,&nbsp;Lothar Lilge,&nbsp;Tony Mazzulli\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/104454703322564497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the irradiance-dependency of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) effects on bacterial growth.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>LLLT is applied to open wounds to improve healing; however, its effect on wound bacteria is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were irradiated using a wavelength of 810 nm at irradiances of 0.015 W/cm2 (0-50 J/cm2) and 0.03 W/cm2 (0-80 J/cm2). Bacteria were counted after 20 h of incubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LLLT effects varied significantly with species. P.aeruginosa growth decreased overall dependent on an interaction of irradiance and radiant exposure; greatest inhibition was produced using high irradiance delivering radiant exposures in the range of 1-20 J/cm2 (p = 0.001-0.04). In contrast, E. coli growth increased overall (p = 0.01), regardless of irradiance; greatest effects were produced using low radiant exposures (1-20 J/cm2). There was a main effect for irradiance (p = 0.03) on S. aureus growth; however, growth was not different compared with controls. Additional analysis showed that there were differences in growth of P.aeruginosa when comparing samples that were matched by exposure times (66, 329, 658, 1316, 1974, and 2632 sec) rather than radiant exposure; this suggests that irradiance rather than exposure time was the significant factor in P. aeruginosa inhibition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings have immediate relevancy in the use of LLLT for infected wounds. Exposure to 810-nm irradiation (0.03 W/cm2) could potentially benefit wounds infected with P. aeruginosa. However, increased E. coli growth could further delay recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/104454703322564497\",\"citationCount\":\"81\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/104454703322564497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/104454703322564497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

摘要

目的:研究低强度激光治疗(LLLT)对细菌生长的辐照依赖性。背景:LLLT应用于开放性伤口以促进愈合;然而,其对伤口细菌的影响尚不清楚。材料与方法:对大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌进行辐照,波长为810 nm,辐照度分别为0.015 W/cm2 (0 ~ 50 J/cm2)和0.03 W/cm2 (0 ~ 80 J/cm2)。培养20 h后计数细菌。结果:不同物种间LLLT效应差异显著。铜绿假单胞菌的生长总体上取决于辐照度和辐射暴露的相互作用;在1-20 J/cm2范围内使用高辐照度时产生最大的抑制作用(p = 0.001-0.04)。相比之下,无论辐照度如何,大肠杆菌的总体生长均增加(p = 0.01);使用低辐射照射(1-20 J/cm2)产生的效果最大。辐照度对金黄色葡萄球菌生长有主要影响(p = 0.03);然而,与对照组相比,生长没有什么不同。进一步的分析表明,当比较暴露时间(66、329、658、1316、1974和2632秒)与辐射暴露相匹配的样品时,铜绿假单胞菌的生长存在差异;这表明辐照度而不是暴露时间是铜绿假单胞菌抑制的重要因素。结论:这些研究结果与使用LLLT治疗感染伤口具有直接的相关性。暴露于810 nm (0.03 W/cm2)的照射可能对铜绿假单胞菌感染的伤口有潜在的益处。然而,大肠杆菌的增加可能会进一步延迟恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) of 810 nm upon in vitro growth of bacteria: relevance of irradiance and radiant exposure.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the irradiance-dependency of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) effects on bacterial growth.

Background: LLLT is applied to open wounds to improve healing; however, its effect on wound bacteria is not well understood.

Materials and methods: Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were irradiated using a wavelength of 810 nm at irradiances of 0.015 W/cm2 (0-50 J/cm2) and 0.03 W/cm2 (0-80 J/cm2). Bacteria were counted after 20 h of incubation.

Results: LLLT effects varied significantly with species. P.aeruginosa growth decreased overall dependent on an interaction of irradiance and radiant exposure; greatest inhibition was produced using high irradiance delivering radiant exposures in the range of 1-20 J/cm2 (p = 0.001-0.04). In contrast, E. coli growth increased overall (p = 0.01), regardless of irradiance; greatest effects were produced using low radiant exposures (1-20 J/cm2). There was a main effect for irradiance (p = 0.03) on S. aureus growth; however, growth was not different compared with controls. Additional analysis showed that there were differences in growth of P.aeruginosa when comparing samples that were matched by exposure times (66, 329, 658, 1316, 1974, and 2632 sec) rather than radiant exposure; this suggests that irradiance rather than exposure time was the significant factor in P. aeruginosa inhibition.

Conclusion: These findings have immediate relevancy in the use of LLLT for infected wounds. Exposure to 810-nm irradiation (0.03 W/cm2) could potentially benefit wounds infected with P. aeruginosa. However, increased E. coli growth could further delay recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信