{"title":"商业契约与道德契约:对奈杰尔·卡梅伦的回应。","authors":"J E Hare","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>John E. Hare responds to Cameron's article by challenging the adequacy of the Hippocratic Oath as a basis for ethical medicine. The Oath promoted a \"guild mentality\" that is evident, for example, in modern medicine's resistance to alternative forms of practice. Christians need to \"winnow\" bioethical views, both those traditionally honored and those that confront us because of new medical developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":80931,"journal":{"name":"Christian scholar's review","volume":"23 3","pages":"259-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial contracts and the moral contract: a response to Nigel Cameron.\",\"authors\":\"J E Hare\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>John E. Hare responds to Cameron's article by challenging the adequacy of the Hippocratic Oath as a basis for ethical medicine. The Oath promoted a \\\"guild mentality\\\" that is evident, for example, in modern medicine's resistance to alternative forms of practice. Christians need to \\\"winnow\\\" bioethical views, both those traditionally honored and those that confront us because of new medical developments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian scholar's review\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"259-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian scholar's review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian scholar's review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
John E. Hare回应了Cameron的文章，质疑希波克拉底誓言作为伦理医学基础的充足性。《誓约》促进了一种“行会心态”，例如，现代医学对替代形式的实践的抵制就是显而易见的。基督徒需要“筛选”生物伦理学的观点，包括那些传统上受到尊重的观点和那些由于新的医学发展而面临的观点。
Commercial contracts and the moral contract: a response to Nigel Cameron.
John E. Hare responds to Cameron's article by challenging the adequacy of the Hippocratic Oath as a basis for ethical medicine. The Oath promoted a "guild mentality" that is evident, for example, in modern medicine's resistance to alternative forms of practice. Christians need to "winnow" bioethical views, both those traditionally honored and those that confront us because of new medical developments.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
