Dale Miles, Tarak D Mody, Lori I Hatcher, John Fiene, Mark Stiles, Patrick P Lin, J W Lee
{"title":"液相色谱-串联质谱法和电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法测定人血浆中莫沙芬镥的含量。","authors":"Dale Miles, Tarak D Mody, Lori I Hatcher, John Fiene, Mark Stiles, Patrick P Lin, J W Lee","doi":"10.1208/ps050323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) methods were developed and validated for the evaluation of motexafin lutetium (MLu, lutetium texaphyrin, PCI-0123) pharmacokinetics in human plasma. The LC-MS/MS method was specific for MLu, whereas the ICP-AES method measured total elemental lutetium. Both methods were fast, simple, precise, and accurate. For the LC-MS/MS method, a closely related analogue (PCI-0353) was used as the internal standard (IS). MLu and the IS were extracted from plasma by protein precipitation and injected into an LC-MS/MS system configured with a C18 column and an electrospray interface. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.05 microg MLu mL(-1), with a signal-to-noise ratio of 15:1. The response was linear from 0.05 to 5.0 microg MLu mL(-1). For the ICP-AES method, indium was used as the IS. The sample was digested with nitric acid, diluted, filtered, and then injected into the ICP-AES system. Two standard curve ranges were validated to meet the expected range of sample concentrations: 0.5 to 50, and 0.1 to 10 microg Lu mL(-1). The LC-MS/MS and ICP-AES methods were validated to establish accuracy, precision, analyte stability, and assay robustness. Interday precision and accuracy of quality control samples were < or =6.3% coefficient of variation (CV) and within 2.2% relative error (RE) for the LC-MS/MS method, and < or =8.7% CV and within 4.9% RE for the ICP-AES method. Plasma samples from a subset of patients in a clinical study were analyzed using both methods. For a representative patient, over 90% of the elemental lutetium in plasma could be ascribed to intact MLu at early time points. This percentage decreased to 59% at 48 hours after dosing, suggesting that some degradation and/or metabolism of the drug may have occurred.</p>","PeriodicalId":6918,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSci","volume":"5 3","pages":"E23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1208/ps050323","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitation of motexafin lutetium in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Dale Miles, Tarak D Mody, Lori I Hatcher, John Fiene, Mark Stiles, Patrick P Lin, J W Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/ps050323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) methods were developed and validated for the evaluation of motexafin lutetium (MLu, lutetium texaphyrin, PCI-0123) pharmacokinetics in human plasma. The LC-MS/MS method was specific for MLu, whereas the ICP-AES method measured total elemental lutetium. Both methods were fast, simple, precise, and accurate. For the LC-MS/MS method, a closely related analogue (PCI-0353) was used as the internal standard (IS). MLu and the IS were extracted from plasma by protein precipitation and injected into an LC-MS/MS system configured with a C18 column and an electrospray interface. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.05 microg MLu mL(-1), with a signal-to-noise ratio of 15:1. The response was linear from 0.05 to 5.0 microg MLu mL(-1). For the ICP-AES method, indium was used as the IS. The sample was digested with nitric acid, diluted, filtered, and then injected into the ICP-AES system. Two standard curve ranges were validated to meet the expected range of sample concentrations: 0.5 to 50, and 0.1 to 10 microg Lu mL(-1). The LC-MS/MS and ICP-AES methods were validated to establish accuracy, precision, analyte stability, and assay robustness. Interday precision and accuracy of quality control samples were < or =6.3% coefficient of variation (CV) and within 2.2% relative error (RE) for the LC-MS/MS method, and < or =8.7% CV and within 4.9% RE for the ICP-AES method. Plasma samples from a subset of patients in a clinical study were analyzed using both methods. For a representative patient, over 90% of the elemental lutetium in plasma could be ascribed to intact MLu at early time points. This percentage decreased to 59% at 48 hours after dosing, suggesting that some degradation and/or metabolism of the drug may have occurred.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS PharmSci\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"E23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1208/ps050323\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS PharmSci\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/ps050323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/ps050323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
摘要
开发并验证了液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)和电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱(ICP-AES)方法用于评价莫沙芬-镥(MLu,镥-texapyrin,PCI-0123)在人血浆中的药代动力学。LC-MS/MS方法对MLu具有特异性,而ICP-AES方法测量总元素镥。这两种方法都快速、简单、准确。对于LC-MS/MS方法,使用密切相关的类似物(PCI-0353)作为内标(IS)。通过蛋白质沉淀从血浆中提取MLu和IS,并将其注射到配置有C18柱和电喷雾界面的LC-MS/MS系统中。定量下限为0.05μg MLu mL(-1),信噪比为15:1。反应在0.05至5.0微克MLu mL(-1)范围内呈线性。对于ICP-AES方法,使用铟作为IS。样品用硝酸消化、稀释、过滤,然后注入ICP-AES系统。验证了两个标准曲线范围,以满足样品浓度的预期范围:0.5至50和0.1至10μg Lu mL(-1)。对LC-MS/MS和ICP-AES方法进行了验证,以确定准确性、精密度、分析物稳定性和测定稳健性。LC-MS/MS法的质量控制样品的日间精密度和准确度小于或等于6.3%的变异系数(CV),相对误差(RE)在2.2%以内,ICP-AES法的日间准确度和准确率小于或等于8.7%,相对误差在4.9%以内。在一项临床研究中,使用这两种方法对患者子集的血浆样本进行了分析。对于具有代表性的患者,血浆中超过90%的元素镥可以在早期时间点归属于完整的MLu。给药后48小时,这一百分比降至59%,表明药物可能发生了一些降解和/或代谢。
Quantitation of motexafin lutetium in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy.
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) methods were developed and validated for the evaluation of motexafin lutetium (MLu, lutetium texaphyrin, PCI-0123) pharmacokinetics in human plasma. The LC-MS/MS method was specific for MLu, whereas the ICP-AES method measured total elemental lutetium. Both methods were fast, simple, precise, and accurate. For the LC-MS/MS method, a closely related analogue (PCI-0353) was used as the internal standard (IS). MLu and the IS were extracted from plasma by protein precipitation and injected into an LC-MS/MS system configured with a C18 column and an electrospray interface. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.05 microg MLu mL(-1), with a signal-to-noise ratio of 15:1. The response was linear from 0.05 to 5.0 microg MLu mL(-1). For the ICP-AES method, indium was used as the IS. The sample was digested with nitric acid, diluted, filtered, and then injected into the ICP-AES system. Two standard curve ranges were validated to meet the expected range of sample concentrations: 0.5 to 50, and 0.1 to 10 microg Lu mL(-1). The LC-MS/MS and ICP-AES methods were validated to establish accuracy, precision, analyte stability, and assay robustness. Interday precision and accuracy of quality control samples were < or =6.3% coefficient of variation (CV) and within 2.2% relative error (RE) for the LC-MS/MS method, and < or =8.7% CV and within 4.9% RE for the ICP-AES method. Plasma samples from a subset of patients in a clinical study were analyzed using both methods. For a representative patient, over 90% of the elemental lutetium in plasma could be ascribed to intact MLu at early time points. This percentage decreased to 59% at 48 hours after dosing, suggesting that some degradation and/or metabolism of the drug may have occurred.