基于导管的冠状动脉内β放射治疗新发病变时的地理遗漏和再狭窄

Georgios Sianos , William Wijns , Pim J de Feyter , Ron van Domburg , Patrick W Serruys
{"title":"基于导管的冠状动脉内β放射治疗新发病变时的地理遗漏和再狭窄","authors":"Georgios Sianos ,&nbsp;William Wijns ,&nbsp;Pim J de Feyter ,&nbsp;Ron van Domburg ,&nbsp;Patrick W Serruys","doi":"10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00101-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> We sought to determine the impact of geographical miss (GM) on restenosis rates after intracoronary β-radiation therapy for de novo lesions. <strong>Background:</strong> GM is the situation in which injured vessel segments (VSs) are receiving low-dose radiation and is accounted for edge restenosis. Its impact on the overall restenosis rates remains to be determined. <strong>Methods:</strong> We analyzed 330 patients (356 vessels) treated according to the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE) and the Dose Finding study protocols. Using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), the effective irradiated segment (EIRS), its edges and the total VS were analysed. The edges of the EIRS that were injured constituted the GM edges. Restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis &gt;50% at follow-up. GM was determined by the simultaneous electrocardiographic-matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons deflated and surrounded by contrast, at the site of injury, in identical angiographic projections. <strong>Results:</strong> In 20.5% of the vessels, GM was non-interpretable due to inadequate filming. GM occurred at 30.4% of the interpretable edges and 53% of the interpretable vessels that were analysed. Edge restenosis was significantly increased in the GM compared to non-GM edges (13.16% vs. 4.17%, respectively, <em>P</em>=.001), both in the proximal (<em>P</em>=.03) and the distal (<em>P</em>=.001) edges. GM associated with stent injury significantly increased edge restenosis (<em>P</em>=.006). GM related to balloon injury tended to be associated with increment in edge restenosis (<em>P</em>=.07). The restenosis in the EIRS was similar between vessels with and without GM (17.78% and 14.85%, respectively, <em>P</em>=.6). GM was associated with significant increment in the restenosis at the analyzed VS (31.85% vs. 21.48%, <em>P</em>=.05). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> GM is strongly associated with edges and restenosis in the analysed VS. GM does not increase restenosis in the EIRS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80261,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 138-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00101-X","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographical miss and restenosis during catheter-based intracoronary β-radiation for de novo lesions\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Sianos ,&nbsp;William Wijns ,&nbsp;Pim J de Feyter ,&nbsp;Ron van Domburg ,&nbsp;Patrick W Serruys\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00101-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> We sought to determine the impact of geographical miss (GM) on restenosis rates after intracoronary β-radiation therapy for de novo lesions. <strong>Background:</strong> GM is the situation in which injured vessel segments (VSs) are receiving low-dose radiation and is accounted for edge restenosis. Its impact on the overall restenosis rates remains to be determined. <strong>Methods:</strong> We analyzed 330 patients (356 vessels) treated according to the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE) and the Dose Finding study protocols. Using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), the effective irradiated segment (EIRS), its edges and the total VS were analysed. The edges of the EIRS that were injured constituted the GM edges. Restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis &gt;50% at follow-up. GM was determined by the simultaneous electrocardiographic-matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons deflated and surrounded by contrast, at the site of injury, in identical angiographic projections. <strong>Results:</strong> In 20.5% of the vessels, GM was non-interpretable due to inadequate filming. GM occurred at 30.4% of the interpretable edges and 53% of the interpretable vessels that were analysed. Edge restenosis was significantly increased in the GM compared to non-GM edges (13.16% vs. 4.17%, respectively, <em>P</em>=.001), both in the proximal (<em>P</em>=.03) and the distal (<em>P</em>=.001) edges. GM associated with stent injury significantly increased edge restenosis (<em>P</em>=.006). GM related to balloon injury tended to be associated with increment in edge restenosis (<em>P</em>=.07). The restenosis in the EIRS was similar between vessels with and without GM (17.78% and 14.85%, respectively, <em>P</em>=.6). GM was associated with significant increment in the restenosis at the analyzed VS (31.85% vs. 21.48%, <em>P</em>=.05). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> GM is strongly associated with edges and restenosis in the analysed VS. GM does not increase restenosis in the EIRS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular radiation medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 138-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00101-X\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular radiation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152218650300101X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152218650300101X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:我们试图确定地理缺失(GM)对新发病变冠状动脉内β放射治疗后再狭窄率的影响。背景:GM是受损血管段(VSs)接受低剂量辐射的情况,并被认为是边缘再狭窄的原因。其对总体再狭窄率的影响仍有待确定。方法:我们分析了330例(356条血管)根据欧洲β辐射(BRIE)和剂量寻找研究方案治疗的患者。应用定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)对有效辐照段(EIRS)、边缘及总VS进行分析。损伤的EIRS边缘构成GM边缘。随访时,再狭窄定义为直径狭窄50%。GM是通过同时心电图匹配,源和气球并排投影确定的,在损伤部位,在相同的血管造影投影中放气并被造影剂包围。结果:在20.5%的血管中,GM因拍摄不充分而无法解释。GM发生在30.4%的可解释边缘和53%的可解释血管中。在近端边缘(P= 0.03)和远端边缘(P= 0.001),与非GM边缘相比,GM边缘再狭窄显著增加(分别为13.16%和4.17%,P= 0.001)。与支架损伤相关的GM显著增加边缘再狭窄(P= 0.006)。球囊损伤相关的GM倾向于与边缘再狭窄增加相关(P=.07)。合并和未合并GM的血管EIRS再狭窄发生率相似(分别为17.78%和14.85%,P= 0.6)。GM与VS再狭窄显著增加相关(31.85% VS . 21.48%, P= 0.05)。结论:在分析的病例中,转基因与边缘和再狭窄密切相关,而转基因不会增加EIRS的再狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geographical miss and restenosis during catheter-based intracoronary β-radiation for de novo lesions

Objectives: We sought to determine the impact of geographical miss (GM) on restenosis rates after intracoronary β-radiation therapy for de novo lesions. Background: GM is the situation in which injured vessel segments (VSs) are receiving low-dose radiation and is accounted for edge restenosis. Its impact on the overall restenosis rates remains to be determined. Methods: We analyzed 330 patients (356 vessels) treated according to the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE) and the Dose Finding study protocols. Using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), the effective irradiated segment (EIRS), its edges and the total VS were analysed. The edges of the EIRS that were injured constituted the GM edges. Restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis >50% at follow-up. GM was determined by the simultaneous electrocardiographic-matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons deflated and surrounded by contrast, at the site of injury, in identical angiographic projections. Results: In 20.5% of the vessels, GM was non-interpretable due to inadequate filming. GM occurred at 30.4% of the interpretable edges and 53% of the interpretable vessels that were analysed. Edge restenosis was significantly increased in the GM compared to non-GM edges (13.16% vs. 4.17%, respectively, P=.001), both in the proximal (P=.03) and the distal (P=.001) edges. GM associated with stent injury significantly increased edge restenosis (P=.006). GM related to balloon injury tended to be associated with increment in edge restenosis (P=.07). The restenosis in the EIRS was similar between vessels with and without GM (17.78% and 14.85%, respectively, P=.6). GM was associated with significant increment in the restenosis at the analyzed VS (31.85% vs. 21.48%, P=.05). Conclusions: GM is strongly associated with edges and restenosis in the analysed VS. GM does not increase restenosis in the EIRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信