护理结果分类(NOC)的评估——从理论到实践在以色列。

Outcomes management Pub Date : 2003-07-01
Yardena Kol, Orit Jacobson, Smadar Wieler, Dorit Weiss, Zipora Sadeh
{"title":"护理结果分类(NOC)的评估——从理论到实践在以色列。","authors":"Yardena Kol,&nbsp;Orit Jacobson,&nbsp;Smadar Wieler,&nbsp;Dorit Weiss,&nbsp;Zipora Sadeh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study was undertaken on the use of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) in different practice settings in Israel that included an analysis of problems that can arise in using NOC and a proposed solution. The results indicated four main problems with using the NOC in nursing practice: It is not possible to build from several indicators a weighted index for estimating patient outcomes; some of the indicators are not identical to the clinical guidelines; the grading scales depend largely on subjective judgment; and we question whether an evaluation scale of 5 grades is necessary for such numerical values as vital signs. We suggest dividing the NOC into three main categories (based on original values, objective values as suggested in the clinical guidelines, and values that require the development of quantitative indices) to enable better implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":83840,"journal":{"name":"Outcomes management","volume":"7 3","pages":"121-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC)--from theory to practice in Israel.\",\"authors\":\"Yardena Kol,&nbsp;Orit Jacobson,&nbsp;Smadar Wieler,&nbsp;Dorit Weiss,&nbsp;Zipora Sadeh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A study was undertaken on the use of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) in different practice settings in Israel that included an analysis of problems that can arise in using NOC and a proposed solution. The results indicated four main problems with using the NOC in nursing practice: It is not possible to build from several indicators a weighted index for estimating patient outcomes; some of the indicators are not identical to the clinical guidelines; the grading scales depend largely on subjective judgment; and we question whether an evaluation scale of 5 grades is necessary for such numerical values as vital signs. We suggest dividing the NOC into three main categories (based on original values, objective values as suggested in the clinical guidelines, and values that require the development of quantitative indices) to enable better implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Outcomes management\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"121-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Outcomes management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outcomes management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对在以色列不同实践环境中使用护理结果分类(NOC)进行了一项研究,其中包括对使用NOC可能出现的问题的分析和提出的解决方案。结果表明,在护理实践中使用NOC存在四个主要问题:无法从几个指标中建立一个加权指标来估计患者的预后;有些指标与临床指南不一致;评分标准在很大程度上取决于主观判断;我们质疑生命体征这样的数值是否需要一个5级的评价量表。我们建议将NOC分为三大类(基于原始值、临床指南建议的客观值和需要制定定量指标的值),以便更好地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC)--from theory to practice in Israel.

A study was undertaken on the use of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) in different practice settings in Israel that included an analysis of problems that can arise in using NOC and a proposed solution. The results indicated four main problems with using the NOC in nursing practice: It is not possible to build from several indicators a weighted index for estimating patient outcomes; some of the indicators are not identical to the clinical guidelines; the grading scales depend largely on subjective judgment; and we question whether an evaluation scale of 5 grades is necessary for such numerical values as vital signs. We suggest dividing the NOC into three main categories (based on original values, objective values as suggested in the clinical guidelines, and values that require the development of quantitative indices) to enable better implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信