初级保健护理从业人员编码实践:回顾性图表回顾。

Kymberly R Allen, Caroline B Reinke, Joanne M Pohl, Kristy K Martyn, Elaine P McIntosh
{"title":"初级保健护理从业人员编码实践:回顾性图表回顾。","authors":"Kymberly R Allen,&nbsp;Caroline B Reinke,&nbsp;Joanne M Pohl,&nbsp;Kristy K Martyn,&nbsp;Elaine P McIntosh","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the coding and documentation practices of nurse practitioners (NPs) when using evaluation and management (E & M) codes in an academic primary care center.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A randomized retrospective review of ten charts from a nurse-managed primary care clinic affiliated with a midwestern research-intensive university.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate that the documentation in the chart for six of the ten client encounters did not support the E & M codes assigned by the clinicis NPs. Four of these six client encounters were overcoded; the remaining two encounters were undercoded.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Findings of this study support the need for additional education of NPs in the areas of coding and documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"15 5","pages":"231-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse practitioner coding practices in primary care: a retrospective chart review.\",\"authors\":\"Kymberly R Allen,&nbsp;Caroline B Reinke,&nbsp;Joanne M Pohl,&nbsp;Kristy K Martyn,&nbsp;Elaine P McIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the coding and documentation practices of nurse practitioners (NPs) when using evaluation and management (E & M) codes in an academic primary care center.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A randomized retrospective review of ten charts from a nurse-managed primary care clinic affiliated with a midwestern research-intensive university.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate that the documentation in the chart for six of the ten client encounters did not support the E & M codes assigned by the clinicis NPs. Four of these six client encounters were overcoded; the remaining two encounters were undercoded.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Findings of this study support the need for additional education of NPs in the areas of coding and documentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"231-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2003.tb00364.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:描述在一个学术初级保健中心,执业护士(NPs)在使用评估和管理(e&m)代码时的编码和文件实践。数据来源:一项随机回顾性研究,对中西部一所研究型大学附属护士管理的初级保健诊所的十张图表进行了回顾。结论:研究结果表明,图表中十个客户遭遇中的六个不支持临床NPs分配的电子和管理代码。这六次客户会面中有四次被过度编码;剩下的两次相遇是暗码的。对实践的启示:本研究的发现支持在编码和文档方面对NPs进行额外教育的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse practitioner coding practices in primary care: a retrospective chart review.

Purpose: To describe the coding and documentation practices of nurse practitioners (NPs) when using evaluation and management (E & M) codes in an academic primary care center.

Data sources: A randomized retrospective review of ten charts from a nurse-managed primary care clinic affiliated with a midwestern research-intensive university.

Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that the documentation in the chart for six of the ten client encounters did not support the E & M codes assigned by the clinicis NPs. Four of these six client encounters were overcoded; the remaining two encounters were undercoded.

Implications for practice: Findings of this study support the need for additional education of NPs in the areas of coding and documentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信