隐形法:HIPAA对“商业伙伴”的后门规定。

Managed care quarterly Pub Date : 2003-01-01
James M Jacobson
{"title":"隐形法:HIPAA对“商业伙伴”的后门规定。","authors":"James M Jacobson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The final HIPAA privacy modifications have substantially lightened the administrative, compliance, and liability loads borne by health plan and provider covered entities. Unlike under the original Clinton rules, for example, covered entities are no longer required to obtain patient consents, to monitor and mitigate the information practices of their business associates, or to treat patients as third-party beneficiaries of their business associate contracts. But the final modifications have done almost nothing to lessen the huge burdens and expense that will soon be imposed on those managed care entities that are merely business associates, a category that Congress never authorized HHS to regulate.</p>","PeriodicalId":79681,"journal":{"name":"Managed care quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":"37-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stealth law: HIPAA's back-door regulation of \\\"business associates\\\".\",\"authors\":\"James M Jacobson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The final HIPAA privacy modifications have substantially lightened the administrative, compliance, and liability loads borne by health plan and provider covered entities. Unlike under the original Clinton rules, for example, covered entities are no longer required to obtain patient consents, to monitor and mitigate the information practices of their business associates, or to treat patients as third-party beneficiaries of their business associate contracts. But the final modifications have done almost nothing to lessen the huge burdens and expense that will soon be imposed on those managed care entities that are merely business associates, a category that Congress never authorized HHS to regulate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"37-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managed care quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managed care quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最终的HIPAA隐私修改大大减轻了由健康计划和提供商覆盖的实体承担的管理、遵从性和责任负担。例如,与最初的克林顿规则不同,受保实体不再需要获得患者同意,监控和减轻其商业伙伴的信息实践,或将患者视为其商业伙伴合同的第三方受益人。但最终的修改几乎没有减轻即将强加给那些仅仅是商业伙伴的管理式医疗实体的巨大负担和费用,这是国会从未授权卫生与公众服务部监管的一类实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stealth law: HIPAA's back-door regulation of "business associates".

The final HIPAA privacy modifications have substantially lightened the administrative, compliance, and liability loads borne by health plan and provider covered entities. Unlike under the original Clinton rules, for example, covered entities are no longer required to obtain patient consents, to monitor and mitigate the information practices of their business associates, or to treat patients as third-party beneficiaries of their business associate contracts. But the final modifications have done almost nothing to lessen the huge burdens and expense that will soon be imposed on those managed care entities that are merely business associates, a category that Congress never authorized HHS to regulate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信