腹部心电图与多普勒超声检测胎儿心率的比较。

Muhammad I Ibrahimy, M A Mohd Ali, Edmond Zahedi, Shinji Tsuruoka
{"title":"腹部心电图与多普勒超声检测胎儿心率的比较。","authors":"Muhammad I Ibrahimy,&nbsp;M A Mohd Ali,&nbsp;Edmond Zahedi,&nbsp;Shinji Tsuruoka","doi":"10.1163/156855701321138950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A fetal monitor has been developed for the measurement of the fetal and maternal heart rates from maternal abdominal electrocardiogram during pregnancy and labor for ambulatory monitoring. Developed algorithm of the fetal monitor is based on digital filtering, adaptive thresholding. statistical properties in the time domain and differencing of local maxima and minima. Five volunteers with low risk pregnancies, between 35 to 40 weeks of gestation and no evidence of labor, were studied for the fetal heart rate detection. A Doppler ultrasound fetal monitor was used to compare the accuracy of the measurement system. Results showed an average percent rms difference (PRD) of 5.32% in comparison with the reference ultrasound method. The fetal heart rates curve remained inside a +/- 5 beats/min limit relative to the reference ultrasound method for 84.1% of the time.</p>","PeriodicalId":77139,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering","volume":"11 4","pages":"307-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/156855701321138950","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of abdominal ECG and Doppler ultrasound for fetal heart rate detection.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad I Ibrahimy,&nbsp;M A Mohd Ali,&nbsp;Edmond Zahedi,&nbsp;Shinji Tsuruoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/156855701321138950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A fetal monitor has been developed for the measurement of the fetal and maternal heart rates from maternal abdominal electrocardiogram during pregnancy and labor for ambulatory monitoring. Developed algorithm of the fetal monitor is based on digital filtering, adaptive thresholding. statistical properties in the time domain and differencing of local maxima and minima. Five volunteers with low risk pregnancies, between 35 to 40 weeks of gestation and no evidence of labor, were studied for the fetal heart rate detection. A Doppler ultrasound fetal monitor was used to compare the accuracy of the measurement system. Results showed an average percent rms difference (PRD) of 5.32% in comparison with the reference ultrasound method. The fetal heart rates curve remained inside a +/- 5 beats/min limit relative to the reference ultrasound method for 84.1% of the time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"307-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/156855701321138950\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/156855701321138950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/156855701321138950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

胎儿监护仪已被开发用于测量胎儿和母亲的心率从母体腹部心电图在怀孕和分娩的动态监测。本文提出了基于数字滤波、自适应阈值的胎儿监护仪算法。时域统计性质及局部极大值与极小值的差分。研究人员研究了5名低风险怀孕的志愿者,她们的妊娠期在35至40周之间,没有分娩迹象。采用多普勒超声胎儿监护仪比较测量系统的准确性。结果显示,与参考超声方法的平均rms差(PRD)为5.32%。与参考超声方法相比,84.1%的胎儿心率曲线保持在+/- 5次/分钟以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of abdominal ECG and Doppler ultrasound for fetal heart rate detection.

A fetal monitor has been developed for the measurement of the fetal and maternal heart rates from maternal abdominal electrocardiogram during pregnancy and labor for ambulatory monitoring. Developed algorithm of the fetal monitor is based on digital filtering, adaptive thresholding. statistical properties in the time domain and differencing of local maxima and minima. Five volunteers with low risk pregnancies, between 35 to 40 weeks of gestation and no evidence of labor, were studied for the fetal heart rate detection. A Doppler ultrasound fetal monitor was used to compare the accuracy of the measurement system. Results showed an average percent rms difference (PRD) of 5.32% in comparison with the reference ultrasound method. The fetal heart rates curve remained inside a +/- 5 beats/min limit relative to the reference ultrasound method for 84.1% of the time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信