选择性COX-2抑制剂与非处方布洛芬的相对疗效比较。

Raymond Dionne
{"title":"选择性COX-2抑制剂与非处方布洛芬的相对疗效比较。","authors":"Raymond Dionne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) suppress the activity of both isoforms of cyclo-oxygenase (COX). Inhibition of COX-1, the constitutive isoform, is primarily responsible for the adverse gastrointestinal effects of the NSAIDs whereas inhibition of COX-2, the inducible isoform, accounts for their therapeutic effects. COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib and rofecoxib appear to be as effective as non-selective NSAIDs in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease but their analgesic efficacy and their safety at the higher doses required for analgesia are less certain. There is consistent evidence that COX-1 plays a major role in the early pain response following injury and that analgesia is increased when both COX-1 and COX-2 are inhibited simultaneously. Early postoperative nociception may cause hyperalgesia at a later time by a process of central plasticity. In an experimental model of pain, ibuprofen promptly suppresses prostaglandin E2 concentrations whereas celecoxib has no discernible effect until 90-120 minutes postoperatively, when COX-2 activity is induced. Both drugs significantly reduce pain compared with placebo but celecoxib appears to have a slower onset of action. The analgesic effect of ibuprofen is well characterised for acute pain and short-term treatment is well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative efficacy of selective COX-2 inhibitors compared with over-the-counter ibuprofen.\",\"authors\":\"Raymond Dionne\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) suppress the activity of both isoforms of cyclo-oxygenase (COX). Inhibition of COX-1, the constitutive isoform, is primarily responsible for the adverse gastrointestinal effects of the NSAIDs whereas inhibition of COX-2, the inducible isoform, accounts for their therapeutic effects. COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib and rofecoxib appear to be as effective as non-selective NSAIDs in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease but their analgesic efficacy and their safety at the higher doses required for analgesia are less certain. There is consistent evidence that COX-1 plays a major role in the early pain response following injury and that analgesia is increased when both COX-1 and COX-2 are inhibited simultaneously. Early postoperative nociception may cause hyperalgesia at a later time by a process of central plasticity. In an experimental model of pain, ibuprofen promptly suppresses prostaglandin E2 concentrations whereas celecoxib has no discernible effect until 90-120 minutes postoperatively, when COX-2 activity is induced. Both drugs significantly reduce pain compared with placebo but celecoxib appears to have a slower onset of action. The analgesic effect of ibuprofen is well characterised for acute pain and short-term treatment is well tolerated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)抑制环加氧酶(COX)两种亚型的活性。非甾体抗炎药对组成型异构体COX-1的抑制是其不良胃肠道反应的主要原因,而对诱导型异构体COX-2的抑制则是其治疗效果的主要原因。COX-2抑制剂如塞来昔布和罗非昔布在治疗慢性炎症性疾病方面似乎与非选择性非甾体抗炎药一样有效,但它们的镇痛效果和在更高剂量时的安全性尚不确定。有一致的证据表明,COX-1在损伤后的早期疼痛反应中起主要作用,当COX-1和COX-2同时被抑制时,镇痛作用增加。术后早期的痛觉可通过中枢可塑性过程在后期引起痛觉过敏。在疼痛的实验模型中,布洛芬能迅速抑制前列腺素E2浓度,而塞来昔布直到术后90-120分钟,当COX-2活性被诱导时才有明显的效果。与安慰剂相比,这两种药物都能显著减轻疼痛,但塞来昔布似乎起效较慢。布洛芬对急性疼痛的镇痛效果很好,短期治疗耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative efficacy of selective COX-2 inhibitors compared with over-the-counter ibuprofen.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) suppress the activity of both isoforms of cyclo-oxygenase (COX). Inhibition of COX-1, the constitutive isoform, is primarily responsible for the adverse gastrointestinal effects of the NSAIDs whereas inhibition of COX-2, the inducible isoform, accounts for their therapeutic effects. COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib and rofecoxib appear to be as effective as non-selective NSAIDs in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease but their analgesic efficacy and their safety at the higher doses required for analgesia are less certain. There is consistent evidence that COX-1 plays a major role in the early pain response following injury and that analgesia is increased when both COX-1 and COX-2 are inhibited simultaneously. Early postoperative nociception may cause hyperalgesia at a later time by a process of central plasticity. In an experimental model of pain, ibuprofen promptly suppresses prostaglandin E2 concentrations whereas celecoxib has no discernible effect until 90-120 minutes postoperatively, when COX-2 activity is induced. Both drugs significantly reduce pain compared with placebo but celecoxib appears to have a slower onset of action. The analgesic effect of ibuprofen is well characterised for acute pain and short-term treatment is well tolerated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信