阑尾肿块的处理。

Bobby Tingstedt, Elinor Bexe-Lindskog, Mats Ekelund, Roland Andersson
{"title":"阑尾肿块的处理。","authors":"Bobby Tingstedt,&nbsp;Elinor Bexe-Lindskog,&nbsp;Mats Ekelund,&nbsp;Roland Andersson","doi":"10.1080/11024150201680001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the outcome of patients treated for appendiceal abscess, and managed either conservatively or surgically, and to describe the short and long-term outcome as well as incidence of interval appendicectomy in those treated conservatively.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Ninety-three patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal abscess, 50 treated conservatively and 43 who were operated on, with a mean age of 46 (14-93) years. Mean (range) follow-up for patients operated on was 65 (11-135) and for those treated conservatively 66 (6-136) months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Course of acute disease, recorded complications, recurrence of appendicitis and incidence of interval appendicectomy during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of pain before admission was 4 (0.5-82) days for those operated on and 7 (2-60) days for those treated conservatively. A palpable mass was more common in the conservatively managed group. Complications were common among patients who were operated on. No interval appendicectomies were done during the second half of the study period. 4 of the patients treated conservatively (8%) had an underlying tumour diagnosed at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Operative management of patients with appendiceal masses seems to be associated with a high risk of postoperative complications and the risk of a more extensive surgical procedure. If possible, a conservative approach should be advocated. Because of inaccurate radiological imaging during the acute phase and the risk of an underlying malignancy, routine follow-up is necessary. Routine interval appendicectomy cannot be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":"168 11","pages":"579-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of appendiceal masses.\",\"authors\":\"Bobby Tingstedt,&nbsp;Elinor Bexe-Lindskog,&nbsp;Mats Ekelund,&nbsp;Roland Andersson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11024150201680001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the outcome of patients treated for appendiceal abscess, and managed either conservatively or surgically, and to describe the short and long-term outcome as well as incidence of interval appendicectomy in those treated conservatively.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Ninety-three patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal abscess, 50 treated conservatively and 43 who were operated on, with a mean age of 46 (14-93) years. Mean (range) follow-up for patients operated on was 65 (11-135) and for those treated conservatively 66 (6-136) months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Course of acute disease, recorded complications, recurrence of appendicitis and incidence of interval appendicectomy during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of pain before admission was 4 (0.5-82) days for those operated on and 7 (2-60) days for those treated conservatively. A palpable mass was more common in the conservatively managed group. Complications were common among patients who were operated on. No interval appendicectomies were done during the second half of the study period. 4 of the patients treated conservatively (8%) had an underlying tumour diagnosed at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Operative management of patients with appendiceal masses seems to be associated with a high risk of postoperative complications and the risk of a more extensive surgical procedure. If possible, a conservative approach should be advocated. Because of inaccurate radiological imaging during the acute phase and the risk of an underlying malignancy, routine follow-up is necessary. Routine interval appendicectomy cannot be recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"volume\":\"168 11\",\"pages\":\"579-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"71\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11024150201680001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11024150201680001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

摘要

目的:评价阑尾脓肿患者保守治疗和手术治疗的结果,并描述保守治疗的近期和长期结果以及间隔阑尾切除术的发生率。设计:回顾性研究。地点:瑞典大学医院。病例:确诊阑尾脓肿93例,保守治疗50例,手术43例,平均年龄46(14-93)岁。手术患者的平均(范围)随访时间为65(11-135)个月,保守治疗患者的平均随访时间为66(6-136)个月。主要观察指标:急性病程、并发症记录、随访期间阑尾炎复发率及阑尾切除术发生率。结果:手术组入院前疼痛持续时间为4(0.5 ~ 82)天,保守组入院前疼痛持续时间为7(2 ~ 60)天。可触及肿块在保守治疗组更为常见。手术患者的并发症很常见。在研究的后半段没有进行间歇阑尾切除术。保守治疗的患者中有4例(8%)在随访时诊断为潜在肿瘤。结论:阑尾肿块患者的手术处理似乎与术后并发症的高风险和更广泛手术的风险相关。如果可能的话,应该提倡保守的做法。由于急性期放射成像不准确和潜在恶性肿瘤的风险,常规随访是必要的。不推荐常规间歇阑尾切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of appendiceal masses.

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of patients treated for appendiceal abscess, and managed either conservatively or surgically, and to describe the short and long-term outcome as well as incidence of interval appendicectomy in those treated conservatively.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: University hospital, Sweden.

Patients: Ninety-three patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal abscess, 50 treated conservatively and 43 who were operated on, with a mean age of 46 (14-93) years. Mean (range) follow-up for patients operated on was 65 (11-135) and for those treated conservatively 66 (6-136) months.

Main outcome measures: Course of acute disease, recorded complications, recurrence of appendicitis and incidence of interval appendicectomy during follow-up.

Results: The duration of pain before admission was 4 (0.5-82) days for those operated on and 7 (2-60) days for those treated conservatively. A palpable mass was more common in the conservatively managed group. Complications were common among patients who were operated on. No interval appendicectomies were done during the second half of the study period. 4 of the patients treated conservatively (8%) had an underlying tumour diagnosed at follow-up.

Conclusions: Operative management of patients with appendiceal masses seems to be associated with a high risk of postoperative complications and the risk of a more extensive surgical procedure. If possible, a conservative approach should be advocated. Because of inaccurate radiological imaging during the acute phase and the risk of an underlying malignancy, routine follow-up is necessary. Routine interval appendicectomy cannot be recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信