苏格兰颈动脉内膜切除术:1981-1996。

Marikie M Benade, Alan Finlayson, Charles P Warlow
{"title":"苏格兰颈动脉内膜切除术:1981-1996。","authors":"Marikie M Benade,&nbsp;Alan Finlayson,&nbsp;Charles P Warlow","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our aim was to assess the geographical, social and hospital variation in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) over time in Scotland using routinely generated data, and to assess the outcome of CEA in terms of the 7 day case-fatality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out using computerized medical records at national level of all patients in Scotland who had a CEA during 1981-1996. Medical record linkage was used to identify the study population with the index event specified as CEA. The annual rate of CEA in Scotland and length of hospital stay for the procedure were determined. The geographical distribution of CEA, and the social circumstances of these CEA patients were described. Hospitals where CEAs were performed were evaluated in terms of high-, medium- and low-volume hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,892 CEA patients were identified for the period 1981-1996. The CEA rate increased from 1.2/100,000 (1989) to 8.6/100,000 (1996) with a maximum of 19/100,000 in Tayside Health Board (1994). Most of the CEAs in Scotland after the publication of the trials were in a small number of 'high'-volume hospitals (> 50 operations/year). There was no gender inequality in the provision of CEA in Scotland but substantial social and regional variation was observed. The 7 day operative mortality of 1.5 per cent was higher than that observed in the randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEA in Scotland is performed now at about the expected rate, but there are still probably too many operations being carried out in low-volume hospitals. Length of stay has decreased over time. The operative mortality, however, was higher than in the randomized trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid endarterectomy in Scotland: 1981-1996.\",\"authors\":\"Marikie M Benade,&nbsp;Alan Finlayson,&nbsp;Charles P Warlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pubmed/fdg008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our aim was to assess the geographical, social and hospital variation in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) over time in Scotland using routinely generated data, and to assess the outcome of CEA in terms of the 7 day case-fatality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out using computerized medical records at national level of all patients in Scotland who had a CEA during 1981-1996. Medical record linkage was used to identify the study population with the index event specified as CEA. The annual rate of CEA in Scotland and length of hospital stay for the procedure were determined. The geographical distribution of CEA, and the social circumstances of these CEA patients were described. Hospitals where CEAs were performed were evaluated in terms of high-, medium- and low-volume hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,892 CEA patients were identified for the period 1981-1996. The CEA rate increased from 1.2/100,000 (1989) to 8.6/100,000 (1996) with a maximum of 19/100,000 in Tayside Health Board (1994). Most of the CEAs in Scotland after the publication of the trials were in a small number of 'high'-volume hospitals (> 50 operations/year). There was no gender inequality in the provision of CEA in Scotland but substantial social and regional variation was observed. The 7 day operative mortality of 1.5 per cent was higher than that observed in the randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEA in Scotland is performed now at about the expected rate, but there are still probably too many operations being carried out in low-volume hospitals. Length of stay has decreased over time. The operative mortality, however, was higher than in the randomized trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg008\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:我们的目的是利用常规生成的数据评估苏格兰颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的地理、社会和医院随时间的变化,并根据7天病死率评估CEA的结果。方法:对1981-1996年期间苏格兰所有CEA患者的计算机病历进行描述性、回顾性研究。使用医疗记录链接来确定指定为CEA的指标事件的研究人群。确定了苏格兰CEA的年发病率和该手术的住院时间。描述了CEA的地理分布和这些CEA患者的社会环境。按照高、中、低容量医院对开展cea的医院进行了评估。结果:1981-1996年共发现2892例CEA患者。CEA比率从1.2/10万(1989年)增加到8.6/10万(1996年),泰赛德卫生局的最高比率为19/10万(1994年)。在试验发表后,苏格兰的大多数cea都是在少数“高”业务量医院(> 50例/年)进行的。在苏格兰,CEA的提供没有性别不平等,但观察到大量的社会和地区差异。7天手术死亡率为1.5%,高于随机试验中观察到的死亡率。结论:目前CEA在苏格兰的执行率与预期率大致相符,但在小容量医院中可能仍有太多的手术正在进行。停留时间随着时间的推移而减少。然而,手术死亡率高于随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carotid endarterectomy in Scotland: 1981-1996.

Background: Our aim was to assess the geographical, social and hospital variation in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) over time in Scotland using routinely generated data, and to assess the outcome of CEA in terms of the 7 day case-fatality.

Methods: A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out using computerized medical records at national level of all patients in Scotland who had a CEA during 1981-1996. Medical record linkage was used to identify the study population with the index event specified as CEA. The annual rate of CEA in Scotland and length of hospital stay for the procedure were determined. The geographical distribution of CEA, and the social circumstances of these CEA patients were described. Hospitals where CEAs were performed were evaluated in terms of high-, medium- and low-volume hospitals.

Results: A total of 2,892 CEA patients were identified for the period 1981-1996. The CEA rate increased from 1.2/100,000 (1989) to 8.6/100,000 (1996) with a maximum of 19/100,000 in Tayside Health Board (1994). Most of the CEAs in Scotland after the publication of the trials were in a small number of 'high'-volume hospitals (> 50 operations/year). There was no gender inequality in the provision of CEA in Scotland but substantial social and regional variation was observed. The 7 day operative mortality of 1.5 per cent was higher than that observed in the randomized trials.

Conclusions: CEA in Scotland is performed now at about the expected rate, but there are still probably too many operations being carried out in low-volume hospitals. Length of stay has decreased over time. The operative mortality, however, was higher than in the randomized trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信