利用磁性活化细胞分选和聚合酶链反应常规分析母体血液中的胎儿细胞用于产前诊断的可行性有限。

Sheng-Kai Lin, Esther Shih-Chu Ho, Yune-Tin Hsieh, Fong-Chiu Lo, Huei-Yue Lai, Ming-Huei Chen
{"title":"利用磁性活化细胞分选和聚合酶链反应常规分析母体血液中的胎儿细胞用于产前诊断的可行性有限。","authors":"Sheng-Kai Lin,&nbsp;Esther Shih-Chu Ho,&nbsp;Yune-Tin Hsieh,&nbsp;Fong-Chiu Lo,&nbsp;Huei-Yue Lai,&nbsp;Ming-Huei Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the feasibility of analyzing fetal cells from maternal circulation by using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for prenatal diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one high-risk (either advanced maternal age or abnormal serum Down screening) pregnant women (14-22 weeks) were enrolled. Twenty ml of venous blood from each woman after amniocentesis were pretreated with density gradient centrifugation and sorted by MACS with monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD71 (n = 26) or anti-GPA (n = 5). Nested PCR with Y-specific probes--Y1.5-Y1.8 (n = 10) and Amelogenin (n = 21) were then applied to the sorted nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) for fetal sex determination. These results were compared with cytogenetic data. To assess the sensitivity of PCR, different proportions of known male and female cultured amniocytes were mixed and amplified for gender identification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Karyotypes were normal in all fetuses (18 females and 13 males). The proportions of NRBCs (in total cells) sorted by MACS--anti-GPA or anti-CD71 were 50% (2000 +/- 1500) and 85% (350 +/- 280), respectively. Accuracies of sex determination by PCR-Amelogenin or Y1.5-Y1.8 were 76.2% (16/21) and 50% (5/10), respectively. Three cases resulted in PCR failure. Assay of nested PCR inferred that after cell sorting, existence of at least 20% of male fetal cells mixed in maternal blood circulation was required for prenatal diagnosis under current methodology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed the existence of fetal NRBCs in maternal blood during pregnancy. The low accuracy of sex determination (76.2%) may be attributed to contamination of either maternal NRBCs or non-NRBCs. No conclusive data, however, so far demonstrates the ideal marker to identify the origin of NRBCs. Without specific fetal cell marker and more sophisticated fetal cell analysis methodologies, in our experience, the feasibility of routinely analyzing fetal cells from maternal blood for prenatal diagnosis is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":24073,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited feasibility of routinely analyzing fetal cells from maternal blood by using magnetic activated cell sorting and polymerase chain reaction for prenatal diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-Kai Lin,&nbsp;Esther Shih-Chu Ho,&nbsp;Yune-Tin Hsieh,&nbsp;Fong-Chiu Lo,&nbsp;Huei-Yue Lai,&nbsp;Ming-Huei Chen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the feasibility of analyzing fetal cells from maternal circulation by using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for prenatal diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one high-risk (either advanced maternal age or abnormal serum Down screening) pregnant women (14-22 weeks) were enrolled. Twenty ml of venous blood from each woman after amniocentesis were pretreated with density gradient centrifugation and sorted by MACS with monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD71 (n = 26) or anti-GPA (n = 5). Nested PCR with Y-specific probes--Y1.5-Y1.8 (n = 10) and Amelogenin (n = 21) were then applied to the sorted nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) for fetal sex determination. These results were compared with cytogenetic data. To assess the sensitivity of PCR, different proportions of known male and female cultured amniocytes were mixed and amplified for gender identification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Karyotypes were normal in all fetuses (18 females and 13 males). The proportions of NRBCs (in total cells) sorted by MACS--anti-GPA or anti-CD71 were 50% (2000 +/- 1500) and 85% (350 +/- 280), respectively. Accuracies of sex determination by PCR-Amelogenin or Y1.5-Y1.8 were 76.2% (16/21) and 50% (5/10), respectively. Three cases resulted in PCR failure. Assay of nested PCR inferred that after cell sorting, existence of at least 20% of male fetal cells mixed in maternal blood circulation was required for prenatal diagnosis under current methodology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed the existence of fetal NRBCs in maternal blood during pregnancy. The low accuracy of sex determination (76.2%) may be attributed to contamination of either maternal NRBCs or non-NRBCs. No conclusive data, however, so far demonstrates the ideal marker to identify the origin of NRBCs. Without specific fetal cell marker and more sophisticated fetal cell analysis methodologies, in our experience, the feasibility of routinely analyzing fetal cells from maternal blood for prenatal diagnosis is limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨磁活化细胞分选(MACS)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术在母体循环胎儿细胞诊断中的可行性。方法:纳入31例高危孕妇(高龄或血清唐氏筛查异常)(14-22周)。每位妇女羊膜穿刺术后抽取静脉血20 ml进行密度梯度离心预处理,用抗cd71 (n = 26)或抗gpa (n = 5)单克隆抗体进行MACS分选。然后用y特异性探针-Y1.5-Y1.8 (n = 10)和Amelogenin (n = 21)对分选的有核红细胞(NRBCs)进行巢式PCR测定胎儿性别。这些结果与细胞遗传学数据进行了比较。为了评估PCR的敏感性,我们将已知的不同比例的雄性和雌性羊膜细胞混合并扩增进行性别鉴定。结果:所有胎儿(女18例,男13例)核型均正常。经MACS- anti-GPA或anti-CD71分选的nrbc占总细胞的比例分别为50%(2000 +/- 1500)和85%(350 +/- 280)。PCR-Amelogenin和y1.5 ~ y1.8测定性别的准确率分别为76.2%(16/21)和50%(5/10)。3例PCR失败。巢式PCR分析推断,在目前的方法下,细胞分选后,至少有20%的男性胎儿细胞混合在母体血液循环中,才能进行产前诊断。结论:我们证实孕妇血液中存在胎儿nrbc。性别测定的低准确率(76.2%)可能是由于母体nrbc或非nrbc污染所致。然而,到目前为止还没有结论性的数据证明确定nrbc起源的理想标记物。根据我们的经验,如果没有特定的胎儿细胞标记物和更复杂的胎儿细胞分析方法,常规分析母体血液中的胎儿细胞用于产前诊断的可行性是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limited feasibility of routinely analyzing fetal cells from maternal blood by using magnetic activated cell sorting and polymerase chain reaction for prenatal diagnosis.

Background: To assess the feasibility of analyzing fetal cells from maternal circulation by using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for prenatal diagnosis.

Methods: Thirty-one high-risk (either advanced maternal age or abnormal serum Down screening) pregnant women (14-22 weeks) were enrolled. Twenty ml of venous blood from each woman after amniocentesis were pretreated with density gradient centrifugation and sorted by MACS with monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD71 (n = 26) or anti-GPA (n = 5). Nested PCR with Y-specific probes--Y1.5-Y1.8 (n = 10) and Amelogenin (n = 21) were then applied to the sorted nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) for fetal sex determination. These results were compared with cytogenetic data. To assess the sensitivity of PCR, different proportions of known male and female cultured amniocytes were mixed and amplified for gender identification.

Results: Karyotypes were normal in all fetuses (18 females and 13 males). The proportions of NRBCs (in total cells) sorted by MACS--anti-GPA or anti-CD71 were 50% (2000 +/- 1500) and 85% (350 +/- 280), respectively. Accuracies of sex determination by PCR-Amelogenin or Y1.5-Y1.8 were 76.2% (16/21) and 50% (5/10), respectively. Three cases resulted in PCR failure. Assay of nested PCR inferred that after cell sorting, existence of at least 20% of male fetal cells mixed in maternal blood circulation was required for prenatal diagnosis under current methodology.

Conclusions: We confirmed the existence of fetal NRBCs in maternal blood during pregnancy. The low accuracy of sex determination (76.2%) may be attributed to contamination of either maternal NRBCs or non-NRBCs. No conclusive data, however, so far demonstrates the ideal marker to identify the origin of NRBCs. Without specific fetal cell marker and more sophisticated fetal cell analysis methodologies, in our experience, the feasibility of routinely analyzing fetal cells from maternal blood for prenatal diagnosis is limited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信