{"title":"上下文敏感元素理论。","authors":"Allan R Wagner","doi":"10.1080/02724990244000133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>My theories of associative learning, like those of N. J. Mackintosh and almost all learning theorists, have employed elemental representations of the stimuli involved. We must take notice when two important contributors to elemental theory, J. M. Pearce and W. K. Estes, find sufficient problems with the theory type to cause them to defect from it. I will describe some of the essential problems, concerning the substantial influence of context on learning and retrieval, characterize the different responses of Pearce and Estes, and, then, propose a variation on a recently developed elemental model that was similarly inspired. The resulting elemental theory has a close quantitative relationship to the product-rule of Estes and D. L. Medin, and may help us to rationalize how the same formal experimental design can sometimes produce results that favour the configural interpretation of Pearce and at other times the elemental interpretation of R. A. Rescorla and A. R. Wagner, as these have often been pitted against each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":77438,"journal":{"name":"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"7-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02724990244000133","citationCount":"187","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Context-sensitive elemental theory.\",\"authors\":\"Allan R Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02724990244000133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>My theories of associative learning, like those of N. J. Mackintosh and almost all learning theorists, have employed elemental representations of the stimuli involved. We must take notice when two important contributors to elemental theory, J. M. Pearce and W. K. Estes, find sufficient problems with the theory type to cause them to defect from it. I will describe some of the essential problems, concerning the substantial influence of context on learning and retrieval, characterize the different responses of Pearce and Estes, and, then, propose a variation on a recently developed elemental model that was similarly inspired. The resulting elemental theory has a close quantitative relationship to the product-rule of Estes and D. L. Medin, and may help us to rationalize how the same formal experimental design can sometimes produce results that favour the configural interpretation of Pearce and at other times the elemental interpretation of R. A. Rescorla and A. R. Wagner, as these have often been pitted against each other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"7-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02724990244000133\",\"citationCount\":\"187\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990244000133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990244000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 187
摘要
我的联想学习理论,就像N. J.麦金托什和几乎所有学习理论家的理论一样,都采用了相关刺激的基本表征。我们必须注意到,当元素理论的两位重要贡献者J. M.皮尔斯和W. K.埃斯蒂斯发现理论类型存在足够多的问题,从而导致他们从理论类型中脱离出来的时候。我将描述一些基本问题,涉及上下文对学习和检索的实质性影响,描述Pearce和Estes的不同反应,然后,在最近开发的元素模型的基础上提出一个类似的变化。由此产生的元素理论与Estes和d.l. Medin的产品规则有着密切的定量关系,并且可以帮助我们合理化相同的正式实验设计如何有时产生有利于皮尔斯的结构解释的结果,有时产生有利于R. a . Rescorla和a . R. Wagner的元素解释的结果,因为这两种解释经常相互对立。
My theories of associative learning, like those of N. J. Mackintosh and almost all learning theorists, have employed elemental representations of the stimuli involved. We must take notice when two important contributors to elemental theory, J. M. Pearce and W. K. Estes, find sufficient problems with the theory type to cause them to defect from it. I will describe some of the essential problems, concerning the substantial influence of context on learning and retrieval, characterize the different responses of Pearce and Estes, and, then, propose a variation on a recently developed elemental model that was similarly inspired. The resulting elemental theory has a close quantitative relationship to the product-rule of Estes and D. L. Medin, and may help us to rationalize how the same formal experimental design can sometimes produce results that favour the configural interpretation of Pearce and at other times the elemental interpretation of R. A. Rescorla and A. R. Wagner, as these have often been pitted against each other.